Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yalong Xie
dblp:143/6568
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLM-DR: A Novel LLM-Aided Diffusion Model for Rule Generation on Temporal Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
rule generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLM-DR: A Novel LLM-Aided Diffusion Model for Rule Generation on Temporal Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLM-DR: A Novel LLM-Aided Diffusion Model for Rule Generation on Temporal Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2025 |
Knowledge graphs › temporal knowledge graph
temporal knowledge graph reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLM-DR: A Novel LLM-Aided Diffusion Model for Rule Generation on Temporal Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conditional diffusion · 1.7classifier-free guidance · 1.7LLM-based constraints · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LLM-DR: A Novel LLM-Aided Diffusion Model for Rule Generation on Temporal Knowledge GraphsabstractAmong various temporal knowledge graph (TKG) extrapolation methods, rule-based approaches stand out for their explicit rules and transparent reasoning paths. However, the vast search space for rule extraction poses a challenge in identifying high-quality logic rules. To navigate this challenge, we explore the use of generation models to generate new rules, thereby enriching our rule base and enhancing our reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we introduce LLM-DR, an innovative rule-based method for TKG extrapolation, which harnesses diffusion models to generate rules that are consistent with the distribution of the source data, while also amalgamating the rich semantic insights of Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, our LLM-DR generates semantically relevant and high-quality rules, employing conditional diffusion models in a classifier-free guidance fashion and refining them with LLM-based constraints. To assess rule efficacy, we meticulously design a coarse-to-fine evaluation strategy that initiates with coarse-grained filtering to eliminate less plausible rules and proceeds with fine-grained scoring to quantify the reliability of the retained. Extensive experiments demonstrate the promising capacity of our LLM-DR. Kai Chen 0020, Ye Wang 0015, Liqun Gao, Aiping Li, Xiaojuan Zhao, Bin Zhou 0004, Yalong Xie |
AAAI | 8 |
| 2025 | Temporal knowledge graph extrapolation with subgraph information bottleneck
Kai Chen 0020, Han Yu 0011, Ye Wang 0015, Xiaojuan Zhao, Yalong Xie, Liqun Gao, Aiping Li |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 6 |
| 2022 | A novel bundling learning paradigm for named entity recognition
Bin Ji 0002, Yalong Xie, Jie Yu 0008, Shasha Li 0001, Jun Ma 0015, Yun Ji, Huijun Liu 0003 |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2021 | A Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Model Based on Data Distribution for Credit Card Fraud DetectionabstractCredit card fraud detection (CCFD) is important for protecting the cardholder’s property and the reputation of banks. Class imbalance in credit card transaction data is a primary factor affecting the classification performance of current detection models. However, prior approaches are aimed at improving the prediction accuracy of the minority class samples (fraudulent transactions), but this usually leads to a significant drop in the model’s predictive performance for the majority class samples (legal transactions), which greatly increases the investigation cost for banks. In this paper, we propose a heterogeneous ensemble learning model based on data distribution (HELMDD) to deal with imbalanced data in CCFD. We validate the effectiveness of HELMDD on two real credit card datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that compared with current state‐of‐the‐art models, HELMDD has the best comprehensive performance. HELMDD not only achieves good recall rates for both the minority class and the majority class but also increases the savings rate for banks to 0.8623 and 0.6696, respectively. Yalong Xie, Aiping Li, Liqun Gao, Ziniu Liu |
Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. | 1 |