Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanefi Mercan
dblp:143/6641
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9171-082XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
combinatorial testing |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Flexible Combinatorial Interaction Testing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 CHiP: A Configurable Hybrid Parallel Covering Array Constructor · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2019 |
Software testing › combinatorial testing
covering array generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | CHiP: A Configurable Hybrid Parallel Covering Array Constructor · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2019 |
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Flexible Combinatorial Interaction Testing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU computing
GPU parallelization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | CHiP: A Configurable Hybrid Parallel Covering Array Constructor · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
covering array construction · 1.1constraint solving · 1.1meta-heuristic search · 0.8constraint satisfaction · 0.8GPU parallelism · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | CIT-daily: A combinatorial interaction testing-based daily build process
Hanefi Mercan, Atakan Aytar, Giray Coskun, Dilara Müstecep, Gülsüm Uzer, Cemal Yilmaz 0001 |
J. Syst. Softw. | 1 |
| 2022 | Flexible Combinatorial Interaction TestingabstractWe present Flexible Combinatorial Interaction Testing (F-CIT), which aims to improve the flexibility of combinatorial interaction testing (CIT) by eliminating the necessity of developing specialized constructors for CIT problems that cannot be efficiently and effectively addressed by the existing CIT constructors. F-CIT expresses the entities to be covered and the space of valid test cases, from which the samples are drawn to obtain full coverage, as constraints. Computing an F-CIT object (i.e., a set of test cases obtaining full coverage under a given coverage criterion) then turns into an interesting constraint solving problem, which we callcov-CSP. cov-CSP aims to divide the constraints, each representing an entity to be covered, into a minimum number of satisfiable clusters, such that a solution for a cluster represents a test case and the collection of all the test cases generated (one per cluster) constitutes an F-CIT object, covering each required entity at least once. To solve the cov-CSP problem, thus to compute F-CIT objects, we first present two constructors. One of these constructors attempts to cover as many entities as possible in a cluster before generating a test case, whereas the other constructor generates a test case first and then marks all the entities accommodated by this test case as covered. We then use these constructors to evaluate F-CIT in three studies, each of which addresses a different CIT problem. In the first study, we develop structure-based F-CIT objects to obtain decision coverage-adequate test suites. In the second study, we develop order-based F-CIT objects, which enhance a number of existing order-based coverage criteria by taking the reachability constraints imposed by graph-based models directly into account when computing interaction test suites. In the third study, we develop usage-based F-CIT objects to address the scenarios, in which standard covering arrays are not desirable due to their sizes, by choosing the entities to be covered based on their usage statistics collected from the field. We also carry out user studies to further evaluate F-CIT. The results of these studies suggest that F-CIT is more flexible than the existing CIT approaches. Hanefi Mercan, Arsalan Javeed, Cemal Yilmaz 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2019 | CHiP: A Configurable Hybrid Parallel Covering Array ConstructorabstractWe present a configurable, hybrid, and parallel covering array constructor, called CHiP. CHiP is parallel in that it utilizes vast amount of parallelism provided by graphics processing units (GPUs). CHiP is hybrid in that it bundles the bests of two construction approaches for computing covering arrays; a metaheuristic search-based approach for efficiently covering a large portion of the required combinations and a constraint satisfaction-based approach for effectively covering the remaining hard-to-cover-by-chance combinations. CHiP is configurable in that a trade-off between covering array sizes and construction times can be made. We have conducted a series of experiments, in which we compared the efficiency and effectiveness of CHiP to those of a number of existing constructors by using both full factorial designs and well-known benchmarks. In these experiments, we report new upper bounds on covering array sizes, demonstrating the effectiveness of CHiP, and the first results for a higher coverage strength, demonstrating the scalability of CHiP. Hanefi Mercan, Cemal Yilmaz 0001, Kamer Kaya |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2014 | Sentimental causal rule discovery from Twitter
Rahim Dehkharghani, Hanefi Mercan, Arsalan Javeed, Yücel Saygin |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |