EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thanh Dinh Ta
dblp:143/7945
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 67% Program analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis
symbolic execution |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Specification of concretization and symbolization policies in symbolic execution · ISSTA 2016 |
Software testing › test generation
symbolic testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Specification of concretization and symbolization policies in symbolic execution · ISSTA 2016 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Specification of concretization and symbolization policies in symbolic execution · ISSTA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic execution · 0.2rule-based specification language · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Specification of concretization and symbolization policies in symbolic executionabstractSymbolic Execution (SE) is a popular and profitable approach to automatic code-based software testing. Concretization and symbolization (C/S) is a crucial part of modern SE tools, since it directly impacts the trade-offs between correctness, completeness and efficiency of the approach. Yet, C/S policies have been barely studied. We intend to remedy to this situation and to establish C/S policies on a firm ground. To this end, we propose a clear separation of concerns between C/S specification on one side, through the new rule-based description language CSml, and the algorithmic core of SE on the other side, revisited to take C/S policies into account. This view is implemented on top of an existing SE tool, demonstrating the feasibility and the benefits of the method. This work paves the way for more flexible SE tools with well-documented and reusable C/S policies, as well as for a systematic study of C/S policies. Robin David, Sébastien Bardin, Josselin Feist, Laurent Mounier, Marie-Laure Potet, Thanh Dinh Ta, Jean-Yves Marion |
ISSTA | 6 |
| 2016 | BINSEC/SE: A Dynamic Symbolic Execution Toolkit for Binary-Level AnalysisabstractWhen it comes to software analysis, several approaches exist from heuristic techniques to formal methods, which are helpful at solving different kinds ofproblems. Unfortunately very few initiative seek to aggregate this techniques in the same platform. BINSEC intend to fulfill this lack of binary analysis platform by allowing to perform modular analysis. This work focusses on BINSEC/SE, the new dynamic symbolic execution engine (DSE) implemented in BINSEC. We will highlight the novelties of the engine, especially in terms of interactions between concrete and symbolic execution or optimization of formula generation. Finally, two reverse engineering applications are shown in order to emphasize the tool effectiveness. Robin David, Sébastien Bardin, Thanh Dinh Ta, Laurent Mounier, Josselin Feist, Marie-Laure Potet, Jean-Yves Marion |
SANER | 3 |
| 2014 | A Categorical Treatment of Malicious Behavioral Obfuscation
Romain Péchoux, Thanh Dinh Ta |
TAMC | 2 |