Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noah Klugman

dblp:143/8788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
5 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 96% Wireless sensing and localization · 4%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.722018
Experience: Android Resists Liberation from Its Primary Use Case · MobiCom 2018
Demo: Android Resists Liberation from Its Primary Use Case · MobiCom 2018
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization design
0.612022
ThingSpeak in the Wild: Exploring 38K Visualizations of IoT Data · SenSys 2022
Internet of things and sensor networks › iot architecture
cloud-assisted iot
0.612022
ThingSpeak in the Wild: Exploring 38K Visualizations of IoT Data · SenSys 2022
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot application development
0.212015
Demo: Michigan's IoT Toolkit · SenSys 2015
Wireless sensing and localization
indoor localization
0.112015
Demo: Michigan's IoT Toolkit · SenSys 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

web scraping · 1.7design pattern analysis · 1.7distributed sensors · 1.0cloud-based analytics · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 ThingSpeak in the Wild: Exploring 38K Visualizations of IoT Data
abstract
Cloud services are vital tools for storing, analyzing, and responding to data collected by sensors in the Internet of Things (IoT). With ThingSpeak, a popular web platform that provides these services, users can easily create cloud "channels" to receive, host, and visualize sensor data. In this study, we scrape public channels from 6,511 users to construct a comprehensive picture of both the ThingSpeak developer community and their applications. We release this data to support future work. From this data, we examine 37,989 visualizations and uncover relationships between application domains and visualization techniques utilized. Further, we investigate how ThingSpeak's interface impacts user design choices. To learn which channels most successfully disseminate information, we explore design patterns on channels "liked" on Facebook or discussed in ThingSpeak forums. Finally, we briefly comment on how services like ThingSpeak can better support users' needs moving forward.
Thomas Zachariah, Noah Klugman, Prabal Dutta
SenSys2
2021 Watching the Grid: Utility-Independent Measurements of Electricity Reliability in Accra, Ghana
abstract
In much of the world, electricity grids are not instrumented at the customer level, limiting insights into the power quality experienced by utility customers. Moreover, to understand grid performance, regulators and investors must depend on utilities to self-report reliability data. To address these challenges, we introduce PowerWatch, an agile methodology to directly measure customer experience and aggregated grid performance without relying on the utility for deployment or management. PowerWatch employs a system of distributed sensors coupled with cloud-based analytics. We evaluate the PowerWatch methodology by deploying 462 sensors in homes and businesses in Accra, Ghana for over a year, yielding the largest open-source data set on electricity reliability at the customer-level in the region. We describe the architecture, design, and performance of PowerWatch, as well as the data that are collected, explaining how we determine the accuracy and coverage of our methodology without ground truth. Finally, we report on grid performance issues, finding nearly twice as many outages as the utility observed, suggesting a need for better grid performance monitoring.
Noah Klugman, Joshua Adkins, Emily Paszkiewicz, Molly G. Hickman, Matthew Podolsky, Jay Taneja, Prabal Dutta
IPSN1
2019 Hardware, apps, and surveys at scale: insights from measuring grid reliability in Accra, Ghana
abstract
The vision of sensor systems that collect critical and previously ungathered information about the world is often only realized when sensors, students, and subjects move outside the academic laboratory. However, deployments at even the smallest scales introduce complexities and risks that can be difficult for a research team to anticipate. Over the past year, our interdisciplinary team of engineers and economists has been designing, deploying, and operating a large sensor network in Accra, Ghana that measures power outages and quality at households and firms. This network consists of 457 custom sensors, over 3,000 mobile app instances, thousands of participant surveys, and custom user incentive and deployment management systems. In part, this deployment supports an evaluation of the impacts of investments in the grid on reliability and the subsequent effects of improvements in reliability on socioeconomic well-being. We report our experiences as we move from performing small pilot deployments to our current scale, attempting to identify the pain points at each stage of the deployment. Finally, we extract high-level observations and lessons learned from our deployment activities, which we wish we had originally known when forecasting budgets, human resources, and project timelines. These insights will be critical as we look toward scaling our deployment to the entire city of Accra and beyond, and we hope that they will encourage and support other researchers looking to measure highly granular information about our world's critical systems.
Noah Klugman, Joshua Adkins, Susanna Berkouwer, Kwame Abrokwah, Ivan Bobashev, Pat Pannuto, Matthew Podolsky, Aldo Suseno, Revati Thatte, Catherine Wolfram, Jay Taneja, Prabal Dutta
COMPASS1
2019 The open incentive kit (OINK): standardizing the generation, comparison, and deployment of incentive systems
abstract
Incentives are a key facet of human studies research, yet the state-of-the-art often designs and implements incentive systems in an ad-hoc, on-demand manner. We introduce the first vocabulary for formally describing incentive systems and develop a software infrastructure that enables UI-based graphical generation of complex, auditable, reliable, and reproducible incentive systems. We call this infrastructure the Open INcentive Kit (OINK). A review of recent literature from several communities finds that of the one hundred and twenty-one publications that incorporate incentives, only thirty-one describe their incentive system in detail, and all of these could be implemented using OINK. We evaluate OINK in practice by using it for an active energy monitoring deployment in Ghana and find that OINK successfully facilitates thousands of individual incentive payments. Finally, we describe our efforts to generalize OINK for different research communities, specifically focusing on architectural decisions around extensibility to support unanticipated use cases. OINK is free and open-source software.
Noah Klugman, Santiago Correa, Pat Pannuto, Matthew Podolsky, Jay Taneja, Prabal Dutta
ICTD1
2018 Demo: Android Resists Liberation from Its Primary Use Case
abstract
Network connectivity is often one of the most challenging aspects of deploying sensors. In many countries, cellular networks provide the most reliable, highest bandwidth, and greatest coverage option for internet access. Repurposing smartphones as gateways could extract value from hundreds of millions of devices currently considered to be e-waste. While these factors make smartphones a seemingly ideal platform to serve as a gateway between sensors and the cloud, we find that a device designed for multi-tenant operation and frequent human interaction becomes unreliable when tasked to continuously run a single application with no human interaction, a somewhat counter-intuitive result. Further, we find that economy phones cannot physically withstand continuous operation, resulting in a surprisingly high rate of permanent device failures in the field. If these observations hold more broadly, they would make mobile phones poorly suited to a range of sensing applications for which they have been rumored to hold great promise.
Noah Klugman, Meghan Clark, Pat Pannuto, Prabal Dutta
MobiCom1
2018 Experience: Android Resists Liberation from Its Primary Use Case
abstract
Network connectivity is often one of the most challenging aspects of deploying sensors. In many countries, cellular networks provide the most reliable, highest bandwidth, and greatest coverage option for Internet access. While this makes smartphones a seemingly ideal platform to serve as a gateway between sensors and the cloud, we find that a device designed for multi-tenant operation and frequent human interaction becomes unreliable when tasked to continuously run a single application with no human interaction, a seemingly counter-intuitive result. Further, we find that economy phones cannot physically withstand continuous operation, resulting in a surprisingly high rate of permanent device failures in the field. If these observations hold more broadly, they would make mobile phones poorly suited to a range of sensing applications for which they have been rumored to hold great promise.
Noah Klugman, Veronica Jacome, Meghan Clark, Matthew Podolsky, Pat Pannuto, Neal Jackson, Aley Soud Nassor, Catherine Wolfram, Duncan S. Callaway, Jay Taneja, Prabal Dutta
MobiCom1
2015 Demo: Michigan's IoT Toolkit
abstract
Building connected, pervasive, human-facing, and responsive applications that incorporate local sensors, smartphone interactions, device actuation, and cloud-based learning--the promised features of the Internet of Things (IoT)---requires a complete suite of tools spanning both hardware and software. We present a set of these pieces, including a gateway, four hardware building blocks, multiple sensor platforms, an indoor localization system, and software for connecting users and devices. Each piece plays an integral role towards enabling applications, from facilitating rapid development of wireless smart devices to composing data streams and services from a diverse set of components. By providing layered interoperable systems, our toolkit offers cohesive support for moving beyond single-device, cloud-centric applications---typical in today's IoT landscape--and towards richer applications that incorporate multiple data streams, human interaction, cloud processing, location awareness, multiple communication protocols, historical data, access control, and on-demand user interfaces. To show how the pieces in the toolkit cooperate, we demonstrate a location-based access control application where a user's smartphone can control a room's lighting, but only from within the room. Further, data streams from the phone and nearby sensors are used to provide a constant lighting service which attempts to maintain a user-set brightness under variable external lighting conditions.
Joshua Adkins, Bradford Campbell, Samuel DeBruin, Branden Ghena, Benjamin P. Kempke, Noah Klugman, Ye-Sheng Kuo, Deepika Natarajan, Pat Pannuto, Thomas Zachariah, Alan Zhen, Prabal Dutta
SenSys6