EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arun Venkatraman
dblp:144/1061
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Time series and sequential data · 17% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.8 | 4 | 2017 | Deeply AggreVaTeD: Differentiable Imitation Learning for Sequential Prediction · ICML 2017 Learning to Filter with Predictive State Inference Machines · ICML 2016 Improving Multi-Step Prediction of Learned Time Series Models · AAAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Predictive-State Decoders: Encoding the Future into Recurrent Networks · NIPS 2017 Learning to Filter with Predictive State Inference Machines · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Online Instrumental Variable Regression with Applications to Online Linear System Identification · AAAI 2016 Improving Multi-Step Prediction of Learned Time Series Models · AAAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy learning
neural policy learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deeply AggreVaTeD: Differentiable Imitation Learning for Sequential Prediction · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Predictive-State Decoders: Encoding the Future into Recurrent Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
sequence prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deeply AggreVaTeD: Differentiable Imitation Learning for Sequential Prediction · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online Instrumental Variable Regression with Applications to Online Linear System Identification · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent state space model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning to Filter with Predictive State Inference Machines · ICML 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
system identification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online Instrumental Variable Regression with Applications to Online Linear System Identification · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
multi-step prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improving Multi-Step Prediction of Learned Time Series Models · AAAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Predictive-State Decoders: Encoding the Future into Recurrent Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Inference Machines for Nonparametric Filter Learning · IJCAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample complexity analysis · 0.3predictive-state decoder · 0.3oracle demonstration · 0.3loss regularization · 0.3gradient procedure · 0.3spectral learning · 0.2no-regret online learning · 0.2moment matching · 0.2no-regret learning · 0.2imitation learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Gradient Boosting on Stochastic Data StreamsabstractBoosting is a popular ensemble algorithm that generates more powerful learners by linearly combining base models from a simpler hypothesis class. In this work, we investigate the problem of adapting batch gradient boosting for minimizing convex loss functions to online setting where the loss at each iteration is i.i.d sampled from an unknown distribution. To generalize from batch to online, we first introduce the definition of online weak learning edge with which for strongly convex and smooth loss functions, we present an algorithm, Streaming Gradient Boosting (SGB) with exponential shrinkage guarantees in the number of weak learners. We further present an adaptation of SGB to optimize non-smooth loss functions, for which we derive a $O(\ln(N)/N)$ convergence rate. We also show that our analysis can extend to adversarial online learning setting under a stronger assumption that the online weak learning edge will hold in adversarial setting. We finally demonstrate experimental results showing that in practice our algorithms can achieve competitive results as classic gradient boosting while using less computation. Hanzhang Hu, Wen Sun 0002, Arun Venkatraman, Martial Hebert, J. Andrew Bagnell |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2017 | Deeply AggreVaTeD: Differentiable Imitation Learning for Sequential PredictionabstractRecently, researchers have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance on sequential prediction problems using deep neural networks and Reinforcement Learning (RL). For some of these problems, oracles that can demonstrate good performance may be available during training, but are not used by plain RL methods. To take advantage of this extra information, we propose AggreVaTeD, an extension of the Imitation Learning (IL) approach of Ross \& Bagnell (2014). AggreVaTeD allows us to use expressive differentiable policy representations such as deep networks, while leveraging training-time oracles to achieve faster and more accurate solutions with less training data. Specifically, we present two gradient procedures that can learn neural network policies for several problems, including a sequential prediction task and several high-dimensional robotics control problems. We also provide a comprehensive theoretical study of IL that demonstrates that we can expect up to exponentially-lower sample complexity for learning with AggreVaTeD than with plain RL algorithms. Our results and theory indicate that IL (and AggreVaTeD in particular) can be a more effective strategy for sequential prediction than plain RL. Wen Sun 0002, Arun Venkatraman, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Byron Boots, J. Andrew Bagnell |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Predictive-State Decoders: Encoding the Future into Recurrent NetworksabstractRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a vital modeling technique that rely on internal states learned indirectly by optimization of a supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement training loss. RNNs are used to model dynamic processes that are characterized by underlying latent states whose form is often unknown, precluding its analytic representation inside an RNN. In the Predictive-State Representation (PSR) literature, latent state processes are modeled by an internal state representation that directly models the distribution of future observations, and most recent work in this area has relied on explicitly representing and targeting sufficient statistics of this probability distribution. We seek to combine the advantages of RNNs and PSRs by augmenting existing state-of-the-art recurrent neural networks with Predictive-State Decoders (PSDs), which add supervision to the network's internal state representation to target predicting future observations. PSDs are simple to implement and easily incorporated into existing training pipelines via additional loss regularization. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PSDs with experimental results in three different domains: probabilistic filtering, Imitation Learning, and Reinforcement Learning. In each, our method improves statistical performance of state-of-the-art recurrent baselines and does so with fewer iterations and less data. Arun Venkatraman, Nicholas Rhinehart, Wen Sun 0002, Lerrel Pinto, Martial Hebert, Byron Boots, Kris Makoto Kitani, J. Andrew Bagnell |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Online Instrumental Variable Regression with Applications to Online Linear System IdentificationabstractInstrumental variable regression (IVR) is a statistical technique utilized to recover unbiased estimators when there are errors in the independent variables. Estimator bias in learned time series models can yield poor performance in applications such as long-term prediction and filtering where the recursive use of the model results in the accumulation of propagated error. However, prior work addressed the IVR objective in the batch setting, where it is necessary to store the entire dataset in memory — an infeasible requirementin large dataset scenarios. In this work, we develop Online Instrumental Variable Regression (OIVR), an algorithm that is capable of updating the learned estimator with streaming data. We show that the online adaptation of IVR enjoys a no-regret performance guarantee with respect the original batchsetting by taking advantage of any no-regret online learning algorithm inside OIVR for the underlying update steps. We experimentally demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm in combination with popular no-regret onlinealgorithms for the task of learning predictive dynamical system models and on a prototypical econometrics instrumental variable regression problem. Arun Venkatraman, Wen Sun 0002, Martial Hebert, J. Andrew Bagnell, Byron Boots |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Learning to Filter with Predictive State Inference MachinesabstractLatent state space models are a fundamental and widely used tool for modeling dynamical systems. However, they are difficult to learn from data and learned models often lack performance guarantees on inference tasks such as filtering and prediction. In this work, we present the PREDICTIVE STATE INFERENCE MACHINE (PSIM), a data-driven method that considers the inference procedure on a dynamical system as a composition of predictors. The key idea is that rather than first learning a latent state space model, and then using the learned model for inference, PSIM directly learns predictors for inference in predictive state space. We provide theoretical guarantees for inference, in both realizable and agnostic settings, and showcase practical performance on a variety of simulated and real world robotics benchmarks. Wen Sun 0002, Arun Venkatraman, Byron Boots, J. Andrew Bagnell |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Inference Machines for Nonparametric Filter Learning
Arun Venkatraman, Wen Sun 0002, Martial Hebert, Byron Boots, J. Andrew Bagnell |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Improving Multi-Step Prediction of Learned Time Series ModelsabstractMost typical statistical and machine learning approaches to time series modeling optimize a single-step prediction error. In multiple-step simulation, the learned model is iteratively applied, feeding through the previous output as its new input. Any such predictor however, inevitably introduces errors, and these compounding errors change the input distribution for future prediction steps, breaking the train-test i.i.d assumption common in supervised learning. We present an approach that reuses training data to make a no-regret learner robust to errors made during multi-step prediction. Our insight is to formulate the problem as imitation learning; the training data serves as a "demonstrator" by providing corrections for the errors made during multi-step prediction. By this reduction of multi-step time series prediction to imitation learning, we establish theoretically a strong performance guarantee on the relation between training error and the multi-step prediction error. We present experimental results of our method, DaD, and show significant improvement over the traditional approach in two notably different domains, dynamic system modeling and video texture prediction. Arun Venkatraman, Martial Hebert, J. Andrew Bagnell |
AAAI | 1 |