Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iñigo Alonso 0001
dblp:144/1532 · also Iñigo Alonso-Gonzalez, Iñigo Borja Alonso Gonzalez
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5891-9165ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Generative modeling · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
multimodal generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PixT3: Pixel-based Table-To-Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › data-to-text generation
table-to-text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PixT3: Pixel-based Table-To-Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.8multimodal model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PixT3: Pixel-based Table-To-Text GenerationabstractTable -to-text generation involves generating appropriate textual descriptions given structured tabular data.It has attracted increasing attention in recent years thanks to the popularity of neural network models and the availability of large-scale datasets.A common feature across existing methods is their treatment of the input as a string, i.e., by employing linearization techniques that do not always preserve information in the table, are verbose, and lack space efficiency.We propose to rethink data-to-text generation as a visual recognition task, removing the need for rendering the input in a string format.We present PixT3, a multimodal tableto-text model that overcomes the challenges of linearization and input size limitations encountered by existing models.PixT3 is trained with a new self-supervised learning objective to reinforce table structure awareness and is applicable to open-ended and controlled generation settings.Experiments on the ToTTo (Parikh et al., 2020a) and Logic2Text (Chen et al., 2020c) benchmarks show that PixT3 is competitive and, in some settings, superior to generators that operate solely on text. 1 Iñigo Alonso 0001, Eneko Agirre, Mirella Lapata |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | MedExpQA: Multilingual benchmarking of Large Language Models for Medical Question AnsweringabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have the potential of facilitating the development of Artificial Intelligence technology to assist medical experts for interactive decision support. This potential has been illustrated by the state-of-the-art performance obtained by LLMs in Medical Question Answering, with striking results such as passing marks in licensing medical exams. However, while impressive, the required quality bar for medical applications remains far from being achieved. Currently, LLMs remain challenged by outdated knowledge and by their tendency to generate hallucinated content. Furthermore, most benchmarks to assess medical knowledge lack reference gold explanations which means that it is not possible to evaluate the reasoning of LLMs predictions. Finally, the situation is particularly grim if we consider benchmarking LLMs for languages other than English which remains, as far as we know, a totally neglected topic. In order to address these shortcomings, in this paper we present MedExpQA, the first multilingual benchmark based on medical exams to evaluate LLMs in Medical Question Answering. To the best of our knowledge, MedExpQA includes for the first time reference gold explanations, written by medical doctors, of the correct and incorrect options in the exams. Comprehensive multilingual experimentation using both the gold reference explanations and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches show that performance of LLMs, with best results around 75 accuracy for English, still has large room for improvement, especially for languages other than English, for which accuracy drops 10 points. Therefore, despite using state-of-the-art RAG methods, our results also demonstrate the difficulty of obtaining and integrating readily available medical knowledge that may positively impact results on downstream evaluations for Medical Question Answering. Data, code, and fine-tuned models will be made publicly available.1 Iñigo Alonso 0001, Maite Oronoz, Rodrigo Agerri |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |
| 2024 | Automatic Logical Forms improve fidelity in Table-to-Text generation
Iñigo Alonso 0001, Eneko Agirre |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2013 | MADS: Malicious Android Applications Detection through String Analysis
Borja Sanz 0001, Igor Santos, Javier Nieves, Carlos Laorden, Iñigo Alonso 0001, Pablo García Bringas |
NSS | 5 |