HTML tables on web pages ("web tables") cover a wide variety of topics. Data from web tables can thus be useful for tasks such as knowledge base completion or ad hoc table extension. Before table data can be used for these tasks, the tables must be matched to the respective knowledge base or base table. The challenges of web table matching are the high heterogeneity and the small size of the tables. Though it is known that the majority of web tables are very small, the gold standards that are used to compare web table matching systems mostly consist of larger tables. In this experimental paper, we evaluate T2K Match, a web table to knowledge base matching system, and COMA, a standard schema matching tool, using a sample of web tables that is more realistic than the gold standards that were previously used. We find that both systems fail to produce correct results for many of the very small tables in the sample. As a remedy, we propose to stitch (combine) the tables from each web site into larger ones and match these enlarged tables to the knowledge base or base table afterwards. For this stitching process, we evaluate different schema matching methods in combination with holistic correspondence refinement. Limiting the stitching procedure to web tables from the same web site decreases the heterogeneity and allows us to stitch tables with very high precision. Our experiments show that applying table stitching before running the actual matching method improves the matching results by 0.38 in F1-measure for T2K Match and by 0.14 for COMA. Also, stitching the tables allows us to reduce the amount of tables in our corpus from 5 million original web tables to as few as 100,000 stitched tables.

Relational tables collected from HTML pages ("web tables") are used for a variety of tasks including table extension, knowledge base completion, and data transformation. Most of the existing algorithms for these tasks assume that the data in the tables has the form of binary relations, i.e., relates a single entity to a value or to another entity. Our exploration of a large public corpus of web tables, however, shows that web tables contain a large fraction of non-binary relations which will likely be misinterpreted by the state-of-the-art algorithms. In this paper, we propose a categorisation scheme for web table columns which distinguishes the different types of relations that appear in tables on the Web and may help to design algorithms which better deal with these different types. Designing an automated classifier that can distinguish between different types of relations is non-trivial, because web tables are relatively small, contain a high level of noise, and often miss partial key values. In order to be able to perform this distinction, we propose a set of features which goes beyond probabilistic functional dependencies by using the union of multiple tables from the same web site and from different web sites to overcome the problem that single web tables are too small for the reliable calculation of functional dependencies.

Cross-domain knowledge bases such as DBpedia, YAGO, or the Google Knowledge Graph have gained increasing attention over the last years and are starting to be deployed within various use cases. However, the content of such knowledge bases is far from being complete, far from always being correct, and suffers from deprecation (i.e. population numbers become outdated after some time). Hence, there are efforts to leverage various types of Web data to complement, update and extend such knowledge bases. A source of Web data that potentially provides a very wide coverage are millions of relational HTML tables that are found on the Web. The existing work on using data from Web tables to augment cross-domain knowledge bases reports only aggregated performance numbers. The actual content of the Web tables and the topical areas of the knowledge bases that can be complemented using the tables remain unclear. In this paper, we match a large, publicly available Web table corpus to the DBpedia knowledge base. Based on the matching results, we profile the potential of Web tables for augmenting different parts of cross-domain knowledge bases and report detailed statistics about classes, properties, and instances for which missing values can be filled using Web table data as evidence. In order to estimate the potential quality of the new values, we empirically examine the Local Closed World Assumption and use it to determine the maximal number of correct facts that an ideal data fusion strategy could generate. Using this as ground truth, we compare three data fusion strategies and conclude that knowledge-based trust outperforms PageRank- and voting-based fusion.