Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Francesco Molfese 0001

dblp:144/4311-1 · also Francesco Maria Molfese · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-7598-2343ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 58% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Language models and text generation · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
commonsense question answering
1.822026
ReTraceQA: Evaluating Reasoning Traces of Small Language Models in Commonsense Question Answering · ACL (1) 2026
ZEBRA: Zero-Shot Example-Based Retrieval Augmentation for Commonsense Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
ReTraceQA: Evaluating Reasoning Traces of Small Language Models in Commonsense Question Answering · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
reasoning trace evaluation
1.012026
ReTraceQA: Evaluating Reasoning Traces of Small Language Models in Commonsense Question Answering · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval augmentation
0.812024
ZEBRA: Zero-Shot Example-Based Retrieval Augmentation for Commonsense Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.212024
ZEBRA: Zero-Shot Example-Based Retrieval Augmentation for Commonsense Question Answering · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

small language model evaluation · 1.0zero-shot prompting · 0.8introspection · 0.8case-based reasoning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ReTraceQA: Evaluating Reasoning Traces of Small Language Models in Commonsense Question Answering
abstract
Francesco Maria Molfese, Luca Moroni, Ciro Porcaro, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Francesco Molfese 0001, Luca Moroni, Ciro Porcaro, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli
ACL (1)1
2024 CroCoAlign: A Cross-Lingual, Context-Aware and Fully-Neural Sentence Alignment System for Long Texts
abstract
Francesco Maria Molfese, Andrei Stefan Bejgu, Simone Tedeschi, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Francesco Molfese 0001, Andrei Stefan Bejgu, Simone Tedeschi, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli
EACL (1)1
2024 ZEBRA: Zero-Shot Example-Based Retrieval Augmentation for Commonsense Question Answering
abstract
Current Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities in commonsense question answering benchmarks, but the process underlying their success remains largely opaque.As a consequence, recent approaches have equipped LLMs with mechanisms for knowledge retrieval, reasoning and introspection, not only to improve their capabilities but also to enhance the interpretability of their outputs.However, these methods require additional training, hand-crafted templates or human-written explanations.To address these issues, we introduce ZEBRA, a zero-shot question answering framework that combines retrieval, case-based reasoning and introspection and dispenses with the need for additional training of the LLM.Given an input question, ZEBRA retrieves relevant questionknowledge pairs from a knowledge base and generates new knowledge by reasoning over the relationships in these pairs.This generated knowledge is then used to answer the input question, improving the model's performance and interpretability.We evaluate our approach across 8 well-established commonsense reasoning benchmarks, demonstrating that ZEBRA consistently outperforms strong LLMs and previous knowledge integration approaches, achieving an average accuracy improvement of up to 4.5 points.
Francesco Molfese 0001, Simone Conia, Riccardo Orlando, Roberto Navigli
EMNLP1
2024 CNER: Concept and Named Entity Recognition
abstract
Giuliano Martinelli, Francesco Molfese, Simone Tedeschi, Alberte Fernández-Castro, Roberto Navigli. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Giuliano Martinelli 0001, Francesco Molfese 0001, Simone Tedeschi, Alberte Fernández-Castro, Roberto Navigli
NAACL-HLT2