Annika Kaltenhauser

dblp:144/5629 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1778-4556ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › first-person perspectives
autoethnography
0.812024
Playing with Perspectives and Unveiling the Autoethnographic Kaleidoscope in HCI - A Literature Review of Autoethnographies · CHI 2024
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review
0.212024
Playing with Perspectives and Unveiling the Autoethnographic Kaleidoscope in HCI - A Literature Review of Autoethnographies · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic literature review · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Playing with Perspectives and Unveiling the Autoethnographic Kaleidoscope in HCI - A Literature Review of Autoethnographies
abstract
Autoethnography is a valuable methodological approach bridging the gap between personal experiences and academic inquiry, enabling researchers to gain deep insights into various dimensions of technology use and design. While its adoption in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) continues to grow, a comprehensive investigation of its function and role within HCI research is still lacking. This paper examines the evolving landscape of autoethnographies within HCI over the past two decades through a systematic literature review. We identify prevalent themes, methodologies, and contributions emerging from autoethnographies by analysing a corpus of 31 HCI publications. Furthermore, we detail data collection techniques and analysis methods and describe reporting standards. Our literature review aims to inform future (HCI) researchers, practitioners, and designers. It encourages them to embrace autoethnography’s rich opportunities by providing examples across domains (e.g., embodiment or health and wellbeing) to advance our understanding of the complex relationships between humans and technology.
Annika Kaltenhauser, Evropi Stefanidi, Johannes Schöning
CHI1
2020 "You Have to Piece the Puzzle Together": Implications for Designing Decision Support in Intensive Care
abstract
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) professionals have to make lifesaving therapy decisions promptly under high stress and uncertainty. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) can improve the quality of healthcare by identifying complex statistical connections between patients' parameters and by rapidly presenting the statistically most promising treatment options to physicians. However, HCI aspects are rarely considered when developing CDSSs. This paper describes a field study conducted in three ICUs investigating how physicians and nurses form (volume) therapy decisions and monitor their success. Our findings reveal a continuous decision cycle in which nurses and physicians collaborate synchronously and asynchronously to provide optimal care. Furthermore, the desire to understand how a CDSS generated recommendations varies depending on the user's goals and other contextual factors such as workload. These findings show that CDSSs for ICUs need to (1) specifically facilitate collaboration and (2) support adaptation of the interface to both context and users.
Annika Kaltenhauser, Verena Rheinstädter, Andreas Butz, Dieter Wallach
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems1