Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tal Kopetz

dblp:144/7376 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 75% Coding theory · 25%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
FIT: A Metric for Model Sensitivity · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sensitivity analysis
0.712023
FIT: A Metric for Model Sensitivity · ICLR 2023
Coding theory
channel coding
0.212016
Multiple Access Channels With Combined Cooperation and Partial Cribbing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016
Information theory › network information theory
cooperative communication
0.212016
Multiple Access Channels With Combined Cooperation and Partial Cribbing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016
Information theory › network information theory › multiple-access channel
cribbing encoders
0.212016
Multiple Access Channels With Combined Cooperation and Partial Cribbing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016
Information theory › network information theory
multiple-access channel
0.212016
Multiple Access Channels With Combined Cooperation and Partial Cribbing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.7information-theoretic achievability · 0.2converse bound · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 FIT: A Metric for Model Sensitivity
Ben Zandonati, Adrian Alan Pol, Maurizio Pierini, Olya Sirkin, Tal Kopetz
ICLR5
2016 Multiple Access Channels With Combined Cooperation and Partial Cribbing
Tal Kopetz, Haim H. Permuter, Shlomo Shamai
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2015 Cooperative multiple access channels with oblivious encoders
abstract
In this paper we study the cooperative multiple access channel (MAC) with oblivious encoders and characterize its capacity region. Cooperation means that one encoder sends a message to the other encoder via a rate-limited link prior to transmission, while partial cribbing means that one encoder obtains a deterministic function of the other encoder's output. Partial cribbing can be done strictly-causally, causally, and non-causally. Prior work in this field dealt with the case where the two encoders are aware of each other's chosen codebook. In this paper we consider the case of oblivious encoding, where each user in a network is unaware of the codebook chosen by other users. Since an oblivious encoder cannot decode the message sent from another encoder, it cannot implement the Decode-and-Forward coding scheme, as is usually done in cases of partial cribbing with codebook-aware encoders. To overcome this, we introduce the method of Bin-and-Forward, which does not require decoding. Since the possible cribbed signals are not known a priori, in our new coding scheme binning is done on all typical possible cribbed sequences. Instead of sending a decoded message, the oblivious encoder sends the bin in which the cribbed sequence lies. We compare the gain achieved using cooperation and partial cribbing with and without codebook knowledge. Evidently, in the cases of causal and non-causal perfect cribbing, the capacity region is the same for oblivious and codebook-aware encoding. As an example, we consider the Gaussian MAC with cooperation and quantized cribbing. For this model, we give an achievability scheme that shows how knowing the codebooks affects the capacity region for cooperation alone, for partial cribbing alone, and for combined cooperation and partial cribbing.
Tal Kopetz, Haim H. Permuter, Shlomo Shamai
ISIT1
2014 Multiple access channels with combined cooperation and partial cribbing
abstract
In this paper we study the multiple access channel (MAC) with combined cooperation and partial cribbing and characterize its capacity region. Cooperation means that the two encoders send a message to one another via a rate-limited link prior to transmission, while partial cribbing means that each of the two encoders obtains a deterministic function of the other encoder's output with or without delay. Prior work in this field dealt separately with cooperation and partial cribbing. However, by combining these two methods we can achieve significantly higher rates. Remarkably, the capacity region does not require an additional auxiliary random variable (RV) since the purpose of both cooperation and partial cribbing is to generate a common message between the encoders. In the proof we combine methods of block Markov coding, backward decoding, double rate-splitting, and joint typicality decoding. Furthermore, we present the Gaussian MAC with combined one-sided cooperation and quantized cribbing. For this model, we give an achievability scheme that shows how many cooperation or quantization bits are required in order to achieve a Gaussian MAC with full cooperation/cribbing capacity region. After establishing our main results, we show that in a state-dependent MAC with cooperation, where the state is known at a partially cribbing encoder and at the decoder, only one auxiliary RV is needed to incorporate both the cribbing and the cooperation. However, there are cases where more than one auxiliary RV is needed, e.g., when the cooperation and cribbing are not used for the same purposes. We present a MAC with an action-dependent state where the action is based on the cooperation but not on the cribbing. Therefore, in this case more than one auxiliary RV is needed. We deduce a general rule for this result.
Tal Kopetz, Haim H. Permuter, Shlomo Shamai
ISIT1