EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Hetterich
dblp:144/7423
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 46% Automated reasoning and model checking · 27% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
code rate |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The rank of sparse random matrices · SODA 2020 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The rank of sparse random matrices · SODA 2020 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › matrix theory
random matrices |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The rank of sparse random matrices · SODA 2020 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
random k-SAT |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Analysing Survey Propagation Guided Decimationon Random Formulas · ICALP 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Analysing Survey Propagation Guided Decimationon Random Formulas · ICALP 2016 |
Distributed computing theory
message-passing algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Analysing Survey Propagation Guided Decimationon Random Formulas · ICALP 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random perturbation · 0.4coupling argument · 0.4survey propagation guided decimation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The rank of sparse random matricesabstractWe determine the rank of a random matrix A over an arbitrary field with prescribed numbers of non-zero entries in each row and column. As an application we obtain a formula for the rate of low-density parity check codes. This formula vindicates a conjecture of Lelarge [Proc. IEEE Information Theory Workshop 2013]. The proofs are based on coupling arguments and a novel random perturbation, applicable to any matrix, that likely diminishes the number of short linear relations. Amin Coja-Oghlan, Alperen Ali Ergür, Pu Gao, Samuel Hetterich, Maurice Rolvien |
SODA | 4 |
| 2017 | Walksat Stalls Well Below SatisfiabilityabstractPartly on the basis of heuristic arguments from physics, it has been suggested that the performance of certain types of algorithms on random $k$-SAT formulas is linked to phase transitions that affect the geometry of the set of satisfying assignments. But, beyond intuition, there has been scant rigorous evidence that “practical” algorithms are affected by these phase transitions. In this paper we prove that Walksat, a popular randomized satisfiability algorithm, fails on random $k$-SAT formulas not very far above clause/variable density, where the set of satisfying assignments shatters into tiny, well-separated clusters. Specifically, we prove that Walksat is ineffective with high probability (w.h.p.) if $m/n>c2^k\ln^2k/k$, where $m$ is the number of clauses, $n$ is the number of variables, and $c>0$ is an absolute constant. By comparison, Walksat is known to find satisfying assignments in linear time w.h.p. if $m/n 0$ [A. Coja-Oghlan and A. Frieze, SIAM J. Comput., 43 (2014), pp. 1456--1485]. Amin Coja-Oghlan, Amir Haqshenas, Samuel Hetterich |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 3 |
| 2016 | Analysing Survey Propagation Guided Decimationon Random FormulasabstractLet vec(theta) be a uniformly distributed random k-SAT formula with n variables and m clauses. For clauses/variables ratio m/n <= r_{k-SAT} ~ 2^k*ln(2) the formula vec(theta) is satisfiable with high probability. However, no efficient algorithm is known to provably find a satisfying assignment beyond m/n ~ 2k*ln(k)/k with a non-vanishing probability. Non-rigorous statistical mechanics work on k-CNF led to the development of a new efficient "message passing algorithm" called Survey Propagation Guided Decimation [Mézard et al., Science 2002]. Experiments conducted for k=3,4,5 suggest that the algorithm finds satisfying assignments close to r_{k-SAT}. However, in the present paper we prove that the basic version of Survey Propagation Guided Decimation fails to solve random k-SAT formulas efficiently already for m/n = 2^{k}(1 + epsilon_k)*ln(k)/k with lim_{k -> infinity} epsilon_k = 0 almost a factor k below r_{k-SAT}. Samuel Hetterich |
ICALP | 1 |
| 2014 | The Condensation Phase Transition in Random Graph ColoringabstractBased on a non-rigorous formalism called the "cavity method", physicists have put forward intriguing predictions on phase transitions in discrete structures. One of the most remarkable ones is that in problems such as random k-SAT or random graph k-coloring, very shortly before the threshold for the existence of solutions there occurs another phase transition called condensation [Krzakala et al., PNAS 2007]. The existence of this phase transition appears to be intimately related to the difficulty of proving precise results on, e.g., the k-colorability threshold as well as to the performance of message passing algorithms. In random graph k-coloring, there is a precise conjecture as to the location of the condensation phase transition in terms of a distributional fixed point problem. In this paper we prove this conjecture for k exceeding a certain constant k0. Victor Bapst, Amin Coja-Oghlan, Samuel Hetterich, Felicia Raßmann, Dan Vilenchik |
APPROX-RANDOM | 3 |