Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hannes Sieling

dblp:144/7794 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence annotation
sequence segmentation
0.212014
Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segments · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics
0.112014
Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segments · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.2multiscale criterion · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segments
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA segmentation, i.e. the partitioning of DNA in compositionally homogeneous segments, is a basic task in bioinformatics. Different algorithms have been proposed for various partitioning criteria such as Guanine/Cytosine (GC) content, local ancestry in population genetics or copy number variation. A critical component of any such method is the choice of an appropriate number of segments. Some methods use model selection criteria and do not provide a suitable error control. Other methods that are based on simulating a statistic under a null model provide suitable error control only if the correct null model is chosen. RESULTS: Here, we focus on partitioning with respect to GC content and propose a new approach that provides statistical error control: as in statistical hypothesis testing, it guarantees with a user-specified probability [Formula: see text] that the number of identified segments does not exceed the number of actually present segments. The method is based on a statistical multiscale criterion, rendering this as a segmentation method that searches segments of any length (on all scales) simultaneously. It is also accurate in localizing segments: under benchmark scenarios, our approach leads to a segmentation that is more accurate than the approaches discussed in the comparative review of Elhaik et al. In our real data examples, we find segments that often correspond well to features taken from standard University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome annotation tracks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is implemented in function smuceR of the R-package stepR available at http://www.stochastik.math.uni-goettingen.de/smuce.
Andreas Futschik, Thomas Hotz, Axel Munk, Hannes Sieling
Bioinform.4