Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Achiya Bar-On

dblp:145/1713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 7 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 70% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 30%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
block cipher
1.342020
Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities · J. Cryptol. 2020
Efficient Slide Attacks · J. Cryptol. 2018
Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities · CRYPTO (2) 2018
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online algorithms with recourse
online checkpointing
0.822020
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ICALP 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
AES
0.412020
Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities · J. Cryptol. 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptanalysis
key recovery attack
0.412020
Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities · J. Cryptol. 2020
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.412020
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › discrepancy theory
discrepancy
0.412020
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.412020
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › differential cryptanalysis
differential-linear cryptanalysis
0.412019
DLCT: A New Tool for Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis · EUROCRYPT (1) 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher cryptanalysis
AES key recovery
0.312018
Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities · CRYPTO (2) 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher cryptanalysis
slide attack
0.312018
Efficient Slide Attacks · J. Cryptol. 2018
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › discrepancy theory
discrepancy minimization
0.312018
Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms · ICALP 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
substitution-permutation network
0.212015
Cryptanalysis of SP Networks with Partial Non-Linear Layers · EUROCRYPT (1) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal algorithm · 0.4lower bound proof · 0.4lower bound construction · 0.3key recovery attack · 0.3competitive analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities
Achiya Bar-On, Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir
J. Cryptol.1
2020 Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms
abstract
The problem of online checkpointing is a classical problem with numerous applications that has been studied in various forms for almost 50 years. In the simplest version of this problem, a user has to maintain k memorized checkpoints during a long computation, where the only allowed operation is to move one of the checkpoints from its old time to the current time, and his goal is to keep the checkpoints as evenly spread out as possible at all times. Bringmann, Doerr, Neumann, and Sliacan studied this problem as a special case of an online/offline optimization problem in which the deviation from uniformity is measured by the natural discrepancy metric of the worst case ratio between real and ideal segment lengths. They showed this discrepancy is smaller than 1.59-o(1) for all k and smaller than ln 4-o(1)≈ 1.39 for the sparse subset of k ’s, which are powers of 2. In addition, they obtained upper bounds on the achievable discrepancy for some small values of k . In this article, we solve the main problems left open in the above-mentioned paper by proving that ln 4 is a tight upper and lower bound on the asymptotic discrepancy for all large k and by providing tight upper and lower bounds (in the form of provably optimal checkpointing algorithms, some of which are in fact better than those of Bringmann et al.) for all the small values of k ≤ 10. In the last part of the article, we describe some new applications of this online checkpointing problem.
Achiya Bar-On, Itai Dinur, Orr Dunkelman, Rani Hod, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir
ACM Trans. Algorithms1
2019 DLCT: A New Tool for Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis
Achiya Bar-On, Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller, Ariel Weizman
EUROCRYPT (1)1
2018 Improved Key Recovery Attacks on Reduced-Round AES with Practical Data and Memory Complexities
Achiya Bar-On, Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir
CRYPTO (2)1
2018 Tight Bounds on Online Checkpointing Algorithms
abstract
The problem of online checkpointing is a classical problem with numerous applications which had been studied in various forms for almost 50 years. In the simplest version of this problem, a user has to maintain k memorized checkpoints during a long computation, where the only allowed operation is to move one of the checkpoints from its old time to the current time, and his goal is to keep the checkpoints as evenly spread out as possible at all times. At ICALP'13 Bringmann et al. studied this problem as a special case of an online/offline optimization problem in which the deviation from uniformity is measured by the natural discrepancy metric of the worst case ratio between real and ideal segment lengths. They showed this discrepancy is smaller than 1.59-o(1) for all k, and smaller than ln4-o(1)~~1.39 for the sparse subset of k's which are powers of 2. In addition, they obtained upper bounds on the achievable discrepancy for some small values of k. In this paper we solve the main problems left open in the ICALP'13 paper by proving that ln4 is a tight upper and lower bound on the asymptotic discrepancy for all large k, and by providing tight upper and lower bounds (in the form of provably optimal checkpointing algorithms, some of which are in fact better than those of Bringmann et al.) for all the small values of k <= 10.
Achiya Bar-On, Itai Dinur, Orr Dunkelman, Rani Hod, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir
ICALP1
2018 Efficient Slide Attacks
Achiya Bar-On, Eli Biham, Orr Dunkelman, Nathan Keller
J. Cryptol.1
2016 A 2^70 Attack on the Full MISTY1
Achiya Bar-On, Nathan Keller
CRYPTO (1)1
2015 Cryptanalysis of SP Networks with Partial Non-Linear Layers
Achiya Bar-On, Itai Dinur, Orr Dunkelman, Virginie Lallemand, Nathan Keller, Boaz Tsaban
EUROCRYPT (1)1
2015 Improved Higher-Order Differential Attacks on MISTY1
Achiya Bar-On
FSE1