Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rebecca Sharp

dblp:145/3979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 55% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.412019
On the Importance of Delexicalization for Fact Verification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.312018
Sanity Check: A Strong Alignment and Information Retrieval Baseline for Question Answering · SIGIR 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
retrieval-based question answering
0.312018
Sanity Check: A Strong Alignment and Information Retrieval Baseline for Question Answering · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312018
Sanity Check: A Strong Alignment and Information Retrieval Baseline for Question Answering · SIGIR 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
causal question answering
0.212016
Creating Causal Embeddings for Question Answering with Minimal Supervision · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

one-to-many alignment · 0.7negative alignment · 0.7delexicalization · 0.4word embeddings · 0.2reranking · 0.2bootstrapping · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 From Examples to Rules: Neural Guided Rule Synthesis for Information Extraction
abstract
While deep learning approaches to information extraction have had many successes, they can be difficult to augment or maintain as needs shift. Rule-based methods, on the other hand, can be more easily modified. However, crafting rules requires expertise in linguistics and the domain of interest, making it infeasible for most users. Here we attempt to combine the advantages of these two directions while mitigating their drawbacks. We adapt recent advances from the adjacent field of program synthesis to information extraction, synthesizing rules from provided examples. We use a transformer-based architecture to guide an enumerative search, and show that this reduces the number of steps that need to be explored before a rule is found. Further, we show that without training the synthesis algorithm on the specific domain, our synthesized rules achieve state-of-the-art performance on the 1-shot scenario of a task that focuses on few-shot learning for relation classification, and competitive performance in the 5-shot scenario.
Robert Vacareanu, Marco Antonio Valenzuela-Escárcega, George Caique Gouveia Barbosa, Rebecca Sharp, Gus Hahn-Powell, Mihai Surdeanu
LREC4
2020 An Unsupervised Method for Learning Representations of Multi-word Expressions for Semantic Classification
abstract
This paper explores an unsupervised approach to learning a compositional representation function for multi-word expressions (MWEs), and evaluates it on the Tratz dataset, which associates two-word expressions with the semantic relation between the compound constituents (e.g. the label employer is associated with the noun compound government agency) (Tratz, 2011).The composition function is based on recurrent neural networks, and is trained using the Skip-Gram objective to predict the words in the context of MWEs.Thus our approach can naturally leverage large unlabeled text sources.Further, our method can make use of provided MWEs when available, but can also function as a completely unsupervised algorithm, using MWE boundaries predicted by a single, domain-agnostic part-of-speech pattern.With pre-defined MWE boundaries, our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art performance on the coarse-grained evaluation of the Tratz dataset (Tratz, 2011), with an F1 score of 50.4%.The unsupervised version of our method approaches the performance of the supervised one, and even outperforms it in some configurations.
Robert Vacareanu, Marco Antonio Valenzuela-Escárcega, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu
COLING3
2020 MathAlign: Linking Formula Identifiers to their Contextual Natural Language Descriptions
abstract
Extending machine reading approaches to extract mathematical concepts and their descriptions is useful for a variety of tasks, ranging from mathematical information retrieval to increasing accessibility of scientific documents for the visually impaired. This entails segmenting mathematical formulae into identifiers and linking them to their natural language descriptions. We propose a rule-based approach for this task, which extracts LaTeX representations of formula identifiers and links them to their in-text descriptions, given only the original PDF and the location of the formula of interest. We also present a novel evaluation dataset for this task, as well as the tool used to create it.
Maria Alexeeva, Rebecca Sharp, Marco Antonio Valenzuela-Escárcega, Jennifer Kadowaki, Adarsh Pyarelal, Clayton T. Morrison
LREC2
2020 Towards the Necessity for Debiasing Natural Language Inference Datasets
abstract
Modeling natural language inference is a challenging task. With large annotated data sets available it has now become feasible to train complex neural network based inference methods which achieve state of the art performance. However, it has been shown that these models also learn from the subtle biases inherent in these datasets (CITATION). In this work we explore two techniques for delexicalization that modify the datasets in such a way that we can control the importance that neural-network based methods place on lexical entities. We demonstrate that the proposed methods not only maintain the performance in-domain but also improve performance in some out-of-domain settings. For example, when using the delexicalized version of the FEVER dataset, the in-domain performance of a state of the art neural network method dropped only by 1.12% while its out-of-domain performance on the FNC dataset improved by 4.63%. We release the delexicalized versions of three common datasets used in natural language inference. These datasets are delexicalized using two methods: one which replaces the lexical entities in an overlap-aware manner, and a second, which additionally incorporates semantic lifting of nouns and verbs to their WordNet hypernym synsets
Mithun Paul Panenghat, Sandeep Suntwal, Faiz Rafique, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu
LREC4
2019 On the Importance of Delexicalization for Fact Verification
abstract
Sandeep Suntwal, Mithun Paul, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Sandeep Suntwal, Mithun Paul, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)3
2018 Grounding Gradable Adjectives through Crowdsourcing
Rebecca Sharp, Mithun Paul, Ajay Nagesh, Dane Bell, Mihai Surdeanu
LREC1
2018 Sanity Check: A Strong Alignment and Information Retrieval Baseline for Question Answering
abstract
While increasingly complex approaches to question answering (QA) have been proposed, the true gain of these systems, particularly with respect to their expensive training requirements, can be in- flated when they are not compared to adequate baselines. Here we propose an unsupervised, simple, and fast alignment and informa- tion retrieval baseline that incorporates two novel contributions: a one-to-many alignment between query and document terms and negative alignment as a proxy for discriminative information. Our approach not only outperforms all conventional baselines as well as many supervised recurrent neural networks, but also approaches the state of the art for supervised systems on three QA datasets. With only three hyperparameters, we achieve 47% [email protected] on an 8th grade Science QA dataset, 32.9% [email protected] on a Yahoo! answers QA dataset and 64% MAP on WikiQA.
Vikas Yadav, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu
SIGIR2
2017 Tell Me Why: Using Question Answering as Distant Supervision for Answer Justification
abstract
Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter Jansen, Marco A. Valenzuela-Escárcega, Peter Clark, Michael Hammond. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017). 2017.
Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter A. Jansen, Marco Antonio Valenzuela-Escárcega, Peter Clark, Michael Hammond
CoNLL1
2017 Framing QA as Building and Ranking Intersentence Answer Justifications
abstract
We propose a question answering (QA) approach for standardized science exams that both identifies correct answers and produces compelling human-readable justifications for why those answers are correct. Our method first identifies the actual information needed in a question using psycholinguistic concreteness norms, then uses this information need to construct answer justifications by aggregating multiple sentences from different knowledge bases using syntactic and lexical information. We then jointly rank answers and their justifications using a reranking perceptron that treats justification quality as a latent variable. We evaluate our method on 1,000 multiple-choice questions from elementary school science exams, and empirically demonstrate that it performs better than several strong baselines, including neural network approaches. Our best configuration answers 44% of the questions correctly, where the top justifications for 57% of these correct answers contain a compelling human-readable justification that explains the inference required to arrive at the correct answer. We include a detailed characterization of the justification quality for both our method and a strong baseline, and show that information aggregation is key to addressing the information need in complex questions.
Peter A. Jansen, Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter Clark
Comput. Linguistics2
2016 Creating Causal Embeddings for Question Answering with Minimal Supervision
abstract
A common model for question answering (QA) is that a good answer is one that is closely related to the question, where relatedness is often determined using generalpurpose lexical models such as word embeddings.We argue that a better approach is to look for answers that are related to the question in a relevant way, according to the information need of the question, which may be determined through task-specific embeddings.With causality as a use case, we implement this insight in three steps.First, we generate causal embeddings cost-effectively by bootstrapping cause-effect pairs extracted from free text using a small set of seed patterns.Second, we train dedicated embeddings over this data, by using task-specific contexts, i.e., the context of a cause is its effect.Finally, we extend a state-of-the-art reranking approach for QA to incorporate these causal embeddings.We evaluate the causal embedding models both directly with a casual implication task, and indirectly, in a downstream causal QA task using data from Yahoo! Answers.We show that explicitly modeling causality improves performance in both tasks.In the QA task our best model achieves 37.3% P@1, significantly outperforming a strong baseline by 7.7% (relative).
Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter A. Jansen, Peter Clark, Michael Hammond
EMNLP1
2015 Spinning Straw into Gold: Using Free Text to Train Monolingual Alignment Models for Non-factoid Question Answering
abstract
Rebecca Sharp, Peter Jansen, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter Clark. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Rebecca Sharp, Peter A. Jansen, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter Clark
HLT-NAACL1