Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Belfrit V. Batlajery

dblp:145/4057 · also Belfrit Victor Batlajery · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 50% Data models and query languages · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data provenance
0.312018
A Templating System to Generate Provenance · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2018
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.212014
How do professionals perceive legacy systems and software modernization? · ICSE 2014
Software maintenance and evolution › software reengineering
software modernization
0.212014
How do professionals perceive legacy systems and software modernization? · ICSE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

template expansion algorithm · 0.3survey · 0.2interview study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Templating System to Generate Provenance
abstract
PROV-TEMPLATEIS a declarative approach that enables designers and programmers to design and generate provenance compatible with the PROV standard of the World Wide Web Consortium. Designers specify the topology of the provenance to be generated by composing templates, which are provenance graphs containing variables, acting as placeholders for values. Programmers write programs that log values and package them up in sets of bindings, a data structure associating variables and values. An expansion algorithm generates instantiated provenance from templates and sets of bindings in any of the serialisation formats supported by PROV. A quantitative evaluation shows that sets of bindings have a size that is typically 40 percent of that of expanded provenance templates and that the expansion algorithm is suitably tractable, operating in fractions of milliseconds for the type of templates surveyed in the article. Furthermore, the approach shows four significant software engineering benefits: separation of responsibilities, provenance maintenance, potential runtime checks and static analysis, and provenance consumption. The article gathers quantitative data and qualitative benefits descriptions from four different applications making use of PROV-TEMPLATE. The system is implemented and released in the open-source library ProvToolbox for provenance processing.
Luc Moreau 0001, Belfrit V. Batlajery, Trung Dong Huynh, Danius T. Michaelides, Heather S. Packer
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2014 How do professionals perceive legacy systems and software modernization?
abstract
Existing research in legacy system modernization has traditionally focused on technical challenges, and takes the standpoint that legacy systems are obsolete, yet crucial for an organization's operation. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether practitioners in the industry also share this perception. This paper describes the outcome of an exploratory study in which 26 industrial practitioners were interviewed on what makes a software system a legacy system, what the main drivers are that lead to the modernization of such systems, and what challenges are faced during the modernization process. The findings of the interviews have been validated by means of a survey with 198 respondents. The results show that practitioners value their legacy systems highly, the challenges they face are not just technical, but also include business and organizational aspects.
Ravi Khadka, Belfrit V. Batlajery, Amir Saeidi, Slinger Jansen, Jurriaan Hage
ICSE2