Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aniya Aggarwal
dblp:145/7705
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Software testing › test generation
automated test generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Software testing › machine learning testing
fairness testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic execution · 0.8local explainability · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Black box fairness testing of machine learning modelsabstractAny given AI system cannot be accepted unless its trustworthiness is proven. An important characteristic of a trustworthy AI system is the absence of algorithmic bias. 'Individual discrimination' exists when a given individual different from another only in 'protected attributes' (e.g., age, gender, race, etc.) receives a different decision outcome from a given machine learning (ML) model as compared to the other individual. The current work addresses the problem of detecting the presence of individual discrimination in given ML models. Detection of individual discrimination is test-intensive in a black-box setting, which is not feasible for non-trivial systems. We propose a methodology for auto-generation of test inputs, for the task of detecting individual discrimination. Our approach combines two well-established techniques - symbolic execution and local explainability for effective test case generation. We empirically show that our approach to generate test cases is very effective as compared to the best-known benchmark systems that we examine. Aniya Aggarwal, Pranay Lohia, Seema Nagar, Kuntal Dey, Diptikalyan Saha |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |