Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aniya Aggarwal

dblp:145/7705 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.412019
Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Software testing › test generation
automated test generation
0.412019
Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Software testing › machine learning testing
fairness testing
0.412019
Black box fairness testing of machine learning models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 0.8local explainability · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Black box fairness testing of machine learning models
abstract
Any given AI system cannot be accepted unless its trustworthiness is proven. An important characteristic of a trustworthy AI system is the absence of algorithmic bias. 'Individual discrimination' exists when a given individual different from another only in 'protected attributes' (e.g., age, gender, race, etc.) receives a different decision outcome from a given machine learning (ML) model as compared to the other individual. The current work addresses the problem of detecting the presence of individual discrimination in given ML models. Detection of individual discrimination is test-intensive in a black-box setting, which is not feasible for non-trivial systems. We propose a methodology for auto-generation of test inputs, for the task of detecting individual discrimination. Our approach combines two well-established techniques - symbolic execution and local explainability for effective test case generation. We empirically show that our approach to generate test cases is very effective as compared to the best-known benchmark systems that we examine.
Aniya Aggarwal, Pranay Lohia, Seema Nagar, Kuntal Dey, Diptikalyan Saha
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1