Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marcin Gebala

dblp:145/9191 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
design for testability
0.212014
On Using Implied Values in EDT-based Test Compression · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test data compression
0.212014
On Using Implied Values in EDT-based Test Compression · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.212014
On Using Implied Values in EDT-based Test Compression · DAC 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential test compression · 0.2implied value analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 On Using Implied Values in EDT-based Test Compression
abstract
On-chip test compression has quickly established itself as one of the mainstream design-for-test (DFT) methodologies. It assumes that a tester delivers test patterns in a compressed form, and on-chip decompressors expand them into actual data loaded into scan chains. This paper presents a new and comprehensive method to boost performance of sequential test compression and ATPG operations. The approach is primarily aimed at reducing CPU time associated with generating and compressing test patterns. It prevents ATPG from assigning specified values to many inputs in order to cut down a time-consuming backtracking process needed to resolve conflicts leading to compression aborts. The proposed scheme efficiently combines test compression constraints with ATPG. Experimental results obtained for industrial designs illustrate feasibility of the proposed scheme and are reported herein.
Marcin Gebala, Grzegorz Mrugalski, Nilanjan Mukherjee 0001, Janusz Rajski, Jerzy Tyszer
DAC1