EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mayur Mudigonda
dblp:146/0044
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot manipulation · 43% Motion planning and robot control · 38% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model-based control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › dexterous manipulation
tactile manipulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › tactile feedback control
tactile servoing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exascale deep learning for climate analytics · SC 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Without Detailed Balance · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Without Detailed Balance · ICML 2014 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019 |
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
climate data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Exascale deep learning for climate analytics · SC 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distributed training · 0.7deep learning · 0.7model predictive control · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4deep dynamics model · 0.4fixed-point equation · 0.2detailed balance · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning and Inference in Sparse Coding Models With Langevin DynamicsabstractWe describe a stochastic, dynamical system capable of inference and learning in a probabilistic latent variable model. The most challenging problem in such models-sampling the posterior distribution over latent variables-is proposed to be solved by harnessing natural sources of stochasticity inherent in electronic and neural systems. We demonstrate this idea for a sparse coding model by deriving a continuous-time equation for inferring its latent variables via Langevin dynamics. The model parameters are learned by simultaneously evolving according to another continuous-time equation, thus bypassing the need for digital accumulators or a global clock. Moreover, we show that Langevin dynamics lead to an efficient procedure for sampling from the posterior distribution in the L0 sparse regime, where latent variables are encouraged to be set to zero as opposed to having a small L1 norm. This allows the model to properly incorporate the notion of sparsity rather than having to resort to a relaxed version of sparsity to make optimization tractable. Simulations of the proposed dynamical system on both synthetic and natural image data sets demonstrate that the model is capable of probabilistically correct inference, enabling learning of the dictionary as well as parameters of the prior. Michael Y.-S. Fang, Mayur Mudigonda, Ryan Zarcone, Amir Khosrowshahi, Bruno A. Olshausen |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 2020 | Modeling Mountain Snowpack Dynamics with CGANS: A Validation StudyabstractIn our previous work [1] we show the effectiveness of learning based schemes to emulate numerical simulations. Specifically, we explore the use of GANs to model Snow Water Equivalent (SWE). In this work, we present further analysis of these results, with a model now trained on 30 years of SWE data compared to 10 years for the previous. First, we study the model outputs with station data and find the outputs to closely match the station data. Second, we study the uncertainty of the cGAN based results. We study the correlation between noise and the outputs generated. We hope these contributions can help the community leverage the power of these deep learning models for future works. Ashray Manepalli, Mayur Mudigonda, Adrian Albert |
IGARSS | 2 |
| 2019 | Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive ModelsabstractTouch sensing is widely acknowledged to be important for dexterous robotic manipulation, but exploiting tactile sensing for continuous, non-prehensile manipulation is challenging. General purpose control techniques that are able to effectively leverage tactile sensing as well as accurate physics models of contacts and forces remain largely elusive, and it is unclear how to even specify a desired behavior in terms of tactile percepts. In this paper, we take a step towards addressing these issues by combining high-resolution tactile sensing with data-driven modeling using deep neural network dynamics models. We propose deep tactile MPC, a framework for learning to perform tactile servoing from raw tactile sensor inputs, without manual supervision. We show that this method enables a robot equipped with a GelSight-style tactile sensor to manipulate a ball, analog stick, and 20-sided die, learning from unsupervised autonomous interaction and then using the learned tactile predictive model to reposition each object to user-specified configurations, indicated by a goal tactile reading. Videos, visualizations and the code are available here: https://sites.google.com/view/deeptactilempc. Stephen Tian, Frederik Ebert, Dinesh Jayaraman, Mayur Mudigonda, Chelsea Finn, Roberto Calandra, Sergey Levine |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2018 | Exascale deep learning for climate analytics
Thorsten Kurth, Sean Treichler, Joshua Romero, Mayur Mudigonda, Nathan Luehr, Everett H. Phillips, Ankur Mahesh, Michael A. Matheson, Jack Deslippe, Massimiliano Fatica, Prabhat, Michael Houston |
SC | 4 |
| 2014 | Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Without Detailed BalanceabstractWe present a method for performing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo that largely eliminates sample rejection. In situations that would normally lead to rejection, instead a longer trajectory is computed until a new state is reached that can be accepted. This is achieved using Markov chain transitions that satisfy the fixed point equation, but do not satisfy detailed balance. The resulting algorithm significantly suppresses the random walk behavior and wasted function evaluations that are typically the consequence of update rejection. We demonstrate a greater than factor of two improvement in mixing time on three test problems. We release the source code as Python and MATLAB packages. Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Mayur Mudigonda, Michael R. DeWeese |
ICML | 2 |