EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benedikt Boecking
dblp:146/0168
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4822-0531ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Vision and language · 43% Generative modeling · 15% Learning paradigms · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 82% Data mining · 18% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
weak supervision |
1.8 | 3 | 2023 | Generative Modeling Helps Weak Supervision (and Vice Versa) · ICLR 2023 Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023 Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
vision-language representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023 |
Data mining
crowdsourcing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning and data management › weak supervision
programmatic weak supervision |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning and data management
data annotation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › medical image analysis
disease classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
text semantics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · ECCV (36) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak supervision · 1.8generative modeling · 1.3self-supervised learning · 0.7multi-image encoder · 0.7factor graph · 0.7CNN-Transformer hybrid · 0.7reparameterization · 0.5probabilistic latent variable model · 0.5neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract)abstractCrowdsourcing and weak supervision offer methods to efficiently label large datasets. Our work builds on existing weak supervision models to accommodate ordinal target classes, in an effort to recover ground truth from weak, external labels. We define a parameterized factor function and show that our approach improves over other baselines. Prakruthi Pradeep, Benedikt Boecking, Nicholas Gisolfi, Jacob R. Kintz, Torin K. Clark, Artur Dubrawski |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language ProcessingabstractSelf-supervised learning in vision-language processing (VLP) exploits semantic alignment between imaging and text modalities. Prior work in biomedical VLP has mostly relied on the alignment of single image and report pairs even though clinical notes commonly refer to prior images. This does not only introduce poor alignment between the modalities but also a missed opportunity to exploit rich self-supervision through existing temporal content in the data. In this work, we explicitly account for prior images and reports when available during both training and fine-tuning. Our approach, named BioViL-T, uses a CNN-Transformer hybrid multi-image encoder trained jointly with a text model. It is designed to be versatile to arising challenges such as pose variations and missing input images across time. The resulting model excels on downstream tasks both in single- and multi-image setups, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on (I) progression classification, (II) phrase grounding, and (III) report generation, whilst offering consistent improvements on disease classification and sentence-similarity tasks. We release a novel multi-modal temporal benchmark dataset, MS-CXR-T, to quantify the quality of vision-language representations in terms of temporal semantics. Our experimental results show the advantages of incorporating prior images and reports to make most use of the data. Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie L. Hyland, Qianchu Liu, Fernando Pérez-García, Maximilian Ilse, Daniel C. Castro, Benedikt Boecking, Harshita Sharma, Kenza Bouzid, Anja Thieme, Anton Schwaighofer, Maria Wetscherek, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay |
CVPR | 7 |
| 2023 | Generative Modeling Helps Weak Supervision (and Vice Versa)
Benedikt Boecking, Nicholas Carl Roberts, Willie Neiswanger, Stefano Ermon, Frederic Sala, Artur Dubrawski |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision-Language Processing
Benedikt Boecking, Naoto Usuyama, Shruthi Bannur, Daniel C. Castro, Anton Schwaighofer, Stephanie L. Hyland, Maria Wetscherek, Tristan Naumann, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Hoifung Poon, Ozan Oktay |
ECCV (36) | 1 |
| 2021 | Weak Supervision for Affordable Modeling of Electrocardiogram Data
Mononito Goswami, Benedikt Boecking, Artur Dubrawski |
AMIA | 2 |
| 2021 | Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling
Benedikt Boecking, Willie Neiswanger, Eric P. Xing, Artur Dubrawski |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | End-to-End Weak SupervisionabstractAggregating multiple sources of weak supervision (WS) can ease the data-labeling bottleneck prevalent in many machine learning applications, by replacing the tedious manual collection of ground truth labels. Current state of the art approaches that do not use any labeled training data, however, require two separate modeling steps: Learning a probabilistic latent variable model based on the WS sources -- making assumptions that rarely hold in practice -- followed by downstream model training. Importantly, the first step of modeling does not consider the performance of the downstream model.To address these caveats we propose an end-to-end approach for directly learning the downstream model by maximizing its agreement with probabilistic labels generated by reparameterizing previous probabilistic posteriors with a neural network. Our results show improved performance over prior work in terms of end model performance on downstream test sets, as well as in terms of improved robustness to dependencies among weak supervision sources. Salva Rühling Cachay, Benedikt Boecking, Artur Dubrawski |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Always Lurking: Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Online Human Trafficking DetectionabstractWeb-based human trafficking activity has increased in recent years but it remains sparsely dispersed among escort advertisements and difficult to identify due to its often-latent nature. The use of intelligent systems to detect trafficking can thus have a direct impact on investigative resource allocation and decision-making, and, more broadly, help curb a widespread social problem. Trafficking detection involves assigning a normalized score to a set of escort advertisements crawled from the Web -- a higher score indicates a greater risk of trafficking-related (involuntary) activities. In this paper, we define and study the problem of trafficking detection and present a trafficking detection pipeline architecture developed over three years of research within the DARPA Memex program. Drawing on multi-institutional data, systems, and experiences collected during this time, we also conduct post hoc bias analyses and present a bias mitigation plan. Our findings show that, while automatic trafficking detection is an important application of AI for social good, it also provides cautionary lessons for deploying predictive machine learning algorithms without appropriate de-biasing. This ultimately led to integration of an interpretable solution into a search system that contains over 100 million advertisements and is used by over 200 law enforcement agencies to investigate leads. Kyle Hundman, Thamme Gowda, Mayank Kejriwal, Benedikt Boecking |
AIES | 4 |
| 2014 | Support vector clustering of time series data with alignment kernels
Benedikt Boecking, Stephan K. Chalup, Detlef Seese, Aaron S. W. Wong |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 1 |