Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Benedikt Boecking

dblp:146/0168 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4822-0531ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Vision and language · 43% Generative modeling · 15% Learning paradigms · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Machine learning and data management · 82% Data mining · 18%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
weak supervision
1.832023
Generative Modeling Helps Weak Supervision (and Vice Versa) · ICLR 2023
Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023
Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
vision-language representation learning
0.712023
Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023
Data mining
crowdsourcing
0.712023
Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023
Machine learning and data management › weak supervision
programmatic weak supervision
0.712023
Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning
0.512021
End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.512021
End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.512021
End-to-End Weak Supervision · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning and data management
data annotation
0.512021
Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › medical image analysis
disease classification
0.212023
Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
text semantics
0.212022
Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · ECCV (36) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak supervision · 1.8generative modeling · 1.3self-supervised learning · 0.7multi-image encoder · 0.7factor graph · 0.7CNN-Transformer hybrid · 0.7reparameterization · 0.5probabilistic latent variable model · 0.5neural network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Ordinal Programmatic Weak Supervision and Crowdsourcing for Estimating Cognitive States (Student Abstract)
abstract
Crowdsourcing and weak supervision offer methods to efficiently label large datasets. Our work builds on existing weak supervision models to accommodate ordinal target classes, in an effort to recover ground truth from weak, external labels. We define a parameterized factor function and show that our approach improves over other baselines.
Prakruthi Pradeep, Benedikt Boecking, Nicholas Gisolfi, Jacob R. Kintz, Torin K. Clark, Artur Dubrawski
AAAI2
2023 Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing
abstract
Self-supervised learning in vision-language processing (VLP) exploits semantic alignment between imaging and text modalities. Prior work in biomedical VLP has mostly relied on the alignment of single image and report pairs even though clinical notes commonly refer to prior images. This does not only introduce poor alignment between the modalities but also a missed opportunity to exploit rich self-supervision through existing temporal content in the data. In this work, we explicitly account for prior images and reports when available during both training and fine-tuning. Our approach, named BioViL-T, uses a CNN-Transformer hybrid multi-image encoder trained jointly with a text model. It is designed to be versatile to arising challenges such as pose variations and missing input images across time. The resulting model excels on downstream tasks both in single- and multi-image setups, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on (I) progression classification, (II) phrase grounding, and (III) report generation, whilst offering consistent improvements on disease classification and sentence-similarity tasks. We release a novel multi-modal temporal benchmark dataset, MS-CXR-T, to quantify the quality of vision-language representations in terms of temporal semantics. Our experimental results show the advantages of incorporating prior images and reports to make most use of the data.
Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie L. Hyland, Qianchu Liu, Fernando Pérez-García, Maximilian Ilse, Daniel C. Castro, Benedikt Boecking, Harshita Sharma, Kenza Bouzid, Anja Thieme, Anton Schwaighofer, Maria Wetscherek, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay
CVPR7
2023 Generative Modeling Helps Weak Supervision (and Vice Versa)
Benedikt Boecking, Nicholas Carl Roberts, Willie Neiswanger, Stefano Ermon, Frederic Sala, Artur Dubrawski
ICLR1
2022 Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision-Language Processing
Benedikt Boecking, Naoto Usuyama, Shruthi Bannur, Daniel C. Castro, Anton Schwaighofer, Stephanie L. Hyland, Maria Wetscherek, Tristan Naumann, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Hoifung Poon, Ozan Oktay
ECCV (36)1
2021 Weak Supervision for Affordable Modeling of Electrocardiogram Data
Mononito Goswami, Benedikt Boecking, Artur Dubrawski
AMIA2
2021 Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labeling
Benedikt Boecking, Willie Neiswanger, Eric P. Xing, Artur Dubrawski
ICLR1
2021 End-to-End Weak Supervision
abstract
Aggregating multiple sources of weak supervision (WS) can ease the data-labeling bottleneck prevalent in many machine learning applications, by replacing the tedious manual collection of ground truth labels. Current state of the art approaches that do not use any labeled training data, however, require two separate modeling steps: Learning a probabilistic latent variable model based on the WS sources -- making assumptions that rarely hold in practice -- followed by downstream model training. Importantly, the first step of modeling does not consider the performance of the downstream model.To address these caveats we propose an end-to-end approach for directly learning the downstream model by maximizing its agreement with probabilistic labels generated by reparameterizing previous probabilistic posteriors with a neural network. Our results show improved performance over prior work in terms of end model performance on downstream test sets, as well as in terms of improved robustness to dependencies among weak supervision sources.
Salva Rühling Cachay, Benedikt Boecking, Artur Dubrawski
NeurIPS2
2018 Always Lurking: Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Online Human Trafficking Detection
abstract
Web-based human trafficking activity has increased in recent years but it remains sparsely dispersed among escort advertisements and difficult to identify due to its often-latent nature. The use of intelligent systems to detect trafficking can thus have a direct impact on investigative resource allocation and decision-making, and, more broadly, help curb a widespread social problem. Trafficking detection involves assigning a normalized score to a set of escort advertisements crawled from the Web -- a higher score indicates a greater risk of trafficking-related (involuntary) activities. In this paper, we define and study the problem of trafficking detection and present a trafficking detection pipeline architecture developed over three years of research within the DARPA Memex program. Drawing on multi-institutional data, systems, and experiences collected during this time, we also conduct post hoc bias analyses and present a bias mitigation plan. Our findings show that, while automatic trafficking detection is an important application of AI for social good, it also provides cautionary lessons for deploying predictive machine learning algorithms without appropriate de-biasing. This ultimately led to integration of an interpretable solution into a search system that contains over 100 million advertisements and is used by over 200 law enforcement agencies to investigate leads.
Kyle Hundman, Thamme Gowda, Mayank Kejriwal, Benedikt Boecking
AIES4
2014 Support vector clustering of time series data with alignment kernels
Benedikt Boecking, Stephan K. Chalup, Detlef Seese, Aaron S. W. Wong
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1