Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Przemyslaw Daca
dblp:146/0751
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 6 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 64% Algorithms and data structures · 19% Logic in computer science · 17% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › probabilistic model checking
markov decision process verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › probabilistic verification
value iteration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017 |
Logic in computer science
program logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Array Folds Logic · CAV (2) 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › abstraction refinement
counterexample-guided abstraction refinement |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems · CAV 2014 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems · CAV 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value iteration · 0.3CEGAR · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Statistical Model Checking: Black or White?
Pranav Ashok, Przemyslaw Daca, Jan Kretínský, Maximilian Weininger |
ISoLA (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes
Pranav Ashok, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Przemyslaw Daca, Jan Kretínský, Tobias Meggendorfer |
CAV (1) | 3 |
| 2017 | Faster Statistical Model Checking for Unbounded Temporal PropertiesabstractWe present a new algorithm for the statistical model checking of Markov chains with respect to unbounded temporal properties, including full linear temporal logic. The main idea is that we monitor each simulation run on the fly, in order to detect quickly if a bottom strongly connected component is entered with high probability, in which case the simulation run can be terminated early. As a result, our simulation runs are often much shorter than required by termination bounds that are computed a priori for a desired level of confidence on a large state space. In comparison to previous algorithms for statistical model checking our method is not only faster in many cases but also requires less information about the system, namely, only the minimum transition probability that occurs in the Markov chain. In addition, our method can be generalised to unbounded quantitative properties such as mean-payoff bounds. Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov |
ACM Trans. Comput. Log. | 1 |
| 2016 | Array Folds Logic
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Andrey Kupriyanov |
CAV (2) | 1 |
| 2016 | Linear Distances between Markov ChainsabstractWe introduce a general class of distances (metrics) between Markov chains, which are based on linear behaviour. This class encompasses distances given topologically (such as the total variation distance or trace distance) as well as by temporal logics or automata. We investigate which of the distances can be approximated by observing the systems, i.e. by black-box testing or simulation, and we provide both negative and positive results. Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov |
CONCUR | 1 |
| 2016 | Faster Statistical Model Checking for Unbounded Temporal PropertiesabstractWe present a new algorithm for the statistical model checking of Markov chains with respect to unbounded temporal properties, including full linear temporal logic. The main idea is that we monitor each simulation run on the fly, in order to detect quickly if a bottom strongly connected component is entered with high probability, in which case the simulation run can be terminated early. As a result, our simulation runs are often much shorter than required by termination bounds that are computed a priori for a desired level of confidence on a large state space. In comparison to previous algorithms for statistical model checking our method is not only faster in many cases but also requires less information about the system, namely, only the minimum transition probability that occurs in the Markov chain. In addition, our method can be generalised to unbounded quantitative properties such as mean-payoff bounds. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov |
TACAS | 1 |
| 2016 | Abstraction-driven Concolic Testing
Przemyslaw Daca, Ashutosh Gupta 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger |
VMCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | CEGAR for compositional analysis of qualitative properties in Markov decision processes
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Przemyslaw Daca |
Formal Methods Syst. Des. | 3 |
| 2014 | CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Przemyslaw Daca |
CAV | 3 |
| 2014 | Compositional Specifications for ioco TestingabstractModel-based testing is a promising technology for black-box software and hardware testing, in which test cases are generated automatically from high-level specifications. Nowadays, systems typically consist of multiple interacting components and, due to their complexity, testing presents a considerable portion of the effort and cost in the design process. Exploiting the compositional structure of system specifications can considerably reduce the effort in model-based testing. Moreover, inferring properties about the system from testing its individual components allows the designer to reduce the amount of integration testing. In this paper, we study compositional properties of the ioco-testing theory. We propose a new approach to composition and hiding operations, inspired by contract-based design and interface theories. These operations preserve behaviors that are compatible under composition and hiding, and prune away incompatible ones. The resulting specification characterizes the input sequences for which the unit testing of components is sufficient to infer the correctness of component integration without the need for further tests. We provide a methodology that uses these results to minimize integration testing effort, but also to detect potential weaknesses in specifications. While we focus on asynchronous models and the ioco conformance relation, the resulting methodology can be applied to a broader class of systems. Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Willibald Krenn, Dejan Nickovic |
ICST | 1 |