Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Przemyslaw Daca

dblp:146/0751 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 6 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 64% Algorithms and data structures · 19% Logic in computer science · 17%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.312017
Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › probabilistic model checking
markov decision process verification
0.312017
Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017
Automated reasoning and model checking › probabilistic verification
value iteration
0.312017
Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes · CAV (1) 2017
Logic in computer science
program logic
0.212016
Array Folds Logic · CAV (2) 2016
Automated reasoning and model checking › abstraction refinement
counterexample-guided abstraction refinement
0.212014
CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems · CAV 2014
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.212014
CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems · CAV 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value iteration · 0.3CEGAR · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Statistical Model Checking: Black or White?
Pranav Ashok, Przemyslaw Daca, Jan Kretínský, Maximilian Weininger
ISoLA (1)2
2017 Value Iteration for Long-Run Average Reward in Markov Decision Processes
Pranav Ashok, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Przemyslaw Daca, Jan Kretínský, Tobias Meggendorfer
CAV (1)3
2017 Faster Statistical Model Checking for Unbounded Temporal Properties
abstract
We present a new algorithm for the statistical model checking of Markov chains with respect to unbounded temporal properties, including full linear temporal logic. The main idea is that we monitor each simulation run on the fly, in order to detect quickly if a bottom strongly connected component is entered with high probability, in which case the simulation run can be terminated early. As a result, our simulation runs are often much shorter than required by termination bounds that are computed a priori for a desired level of confidence on a large state space. In comparison to previous algorithms for statistical model checking our method is not only faster in many cases but also requires less information about the system, namely, only the minimum transition probability that occurs in the Markov chain. In addition, our method can be generalised to unbounded quantitative properties such as mean-payoff bounds.
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov
ACM Trans. Comput. Log.1
2016 Array Folds Logic
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Andrey Kupriyanov
CAV (2)1
2016 Linear Distances between Markov Chains
abstract
We introduce a general class of distances (metrics) between Markov chains, which are based on linear behaviour. This class encompasses distances given topologically (such as the total variation distance or trace distance) as well as by temporal logics or automata. We investigate which of the distances can be approximated by observing the systems, i.e. by black-box testing or simulation, and we provide both negative and positive results.
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov
CONCUR1
2016 Faster Statistical Model Checking for Unbounded Temporal Properties
abstract
We present a new algorithm for the statistical model checking of Markov chains with respect to unbounded temporal properties, including full linear temporal logic. The main idea is that we monitor each simulation run on the fly, in order to detect quickly if a bottom strongly connected component is entered with high probability, in which case the simulation run can be terminated early. As a result, our simulation runs are often much shorter than required by termination bounds that are computed a priori for a desired level of confidence on a large state space. In comparison to previous algorithms for statistical model checking our method is not only faster in many cases but also requires less information about the system, namely, only the minimum transition probability that occurs in the Markov chain. In addition, our method can be generalised to unbounded quantitative properties such as mean-payoff bounds. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Jan Kretínský, Tatjana Petrov
TACAS1
2016 Abstraction-driven Concolic Testing
Przemyslaw Daca, Ashutosh Gupta 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger
VMCAI1
2015 CEGAR for compositional analysis of qualitative properties in Markov decision processes
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Przemyslaw Daca
Formal Methods Syst. Des.3
2014 CEGAR for Qualitative Analysis of Probabilistic Systems
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelik, Przemyslaw Daca
CAV3
2014 Compositional Specifications for ioco Testing
abstract
Model-based testing is a promising technology for black-box software and hardware testing, in which test cases are generated automatically from high-level specifications. Nowadays, systems typically consist of multiple interacting components and, due to their complexity, testing presents a considerable portion of the effort and cost in the design process. Exploiting the compositional structure of system specifications can considerably reduce the effort in model-based testing. Moreover, inferring properties about the system from testing its individual components allows the designer to reduce the amount of integration testing. In this paper, we study compositional properties of the ioco-testing theory. We propose a new approach to composition and hiding operations, inspired by contract-based design and interface theories. These operations preserve behaviors that are compatible under composition and hiding, and prune away incompatible ones. The resulting specification characterizes the input sequences for which the unit testing of components is sufficient to infer the correctness of component integration without the need for further tests. We provide a methodology that uses these results to minimize integration testing effort, but also to detect potential weaknesses in specifications. While we focus on asynchronous models and the ioco conformance relation, the resulting methodology can be applied to a broader class of systems.
Przemyslaw Daca, Thomas A. Henzinger, Willibald Krenn, Dejan Nickovic
ICST1