Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Blaz Bratanic
dblp:146/2697
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Web and mobile security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stepwise Extractive Summarization and Planning with Structured Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
step planning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stepwise Extractive Summarization and Planning with Structured Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Web and mobile security
harmful content detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Supporting Human Raters with the Detection of Harmful Content Using Large Language Models · SP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt engineering · 2.6large language model · 2.6structured transformers · 0.4encoder-centric modeling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Supporting Human Raters with the Detection of Harmful Content Using Large Language ModelsabstractIn this paper, we explore the feasibility of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate or otherwise assist human raters with identifying harmful content including hate speech, harassment, violent extremism, and election misinformation. Using a dataset of 50,000 user comments, we demonstrate that LLMs can achieve 90 % accuracy when compared to human verdicts. We explore how to best leverage these capabilities, proposing five design patterns that integrate LLMs with human rating, such as pre-filtering non-violative content, detecting potential errors in human rating, or surfacing critical context to support human rating. We outline how to support all of these design patterns using a single, optimized prompt. Beyond these synthetic experiments, we share how piloting our proposed techniques in a real-world review queue yielded a 41.5% improvement in optimizing available human rater capacity, and a 9–11 % increase (absolute) in precision and recall for detecting violative content. Kurt Thomas, Patrick Gage Kelley, David Tao, Sarah Meiklejohn, Owen Vallis, Shunwen Tan, Blaz Bratanic, Felipe Tiengo Ferreira, Vijay Eranti, Elie Bursztein |
SP | 7 |
| 2020 | Stepwise Extractive Summarization and Planning with Structured TransformersabstractWe propose encoder-centric stepwise models for extractive summarization using structured transformers -HiBERT (Zhang et al., 2019) and Extended Transformers (Ainslie et al., 2020).We enable stepwise summarization by injecting the previously generated summary into the structured transformer as an auxiliary sub-structure.Our models are not only efficient in modeling the structure of long inputs, but they also do not rely on task-specific redundancy-aware modeling, making them a general purpose extractive content planner for different tasks.When evaluated on CNN/DailyMail extractive summarization, stepwise models achieve state-of-the-art performance in terms of Rouge without any redundancy aware modeling or sentence filtering.This also holds true for Rotowire tableto-text generation, where our models surpass previously reported metrics for content selection, planning and ordering, highlighting the strength of stepwise modeling.Amongst the two structured transformers we test, stepwise Extended Transformers provides the best performance across both datasets and sets a new standard for these challenges. 1 * Equal contribution. Shashi Narayan, Joshua Maynez, Jakub Adámek, Daniele Pighin, Blaz Bratanic, Ryan T. McDonald |
EMNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2015 | Real-time pose estimation of rigid objects in heavily cluttered environments
Blaz Bratanic, Franjo Pernus, Bostjan Likar, Dejan Tomazevic |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 1 |