Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Danielly F. O. de Paula

dblp:146/7220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-4837-7347ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › design process
design thinking
0.412019
Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.412019
Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
software teams
0.412019
Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 InnoDev Workshop: A One Day Introduction to Combining Design Thinking, Lean Startup and Agile Software Development
abstract
Software innovation is a core differential factor for organizational survival to deliver faster, better, and more cost effective software solutions. Accordingly, different approaches to innovations have been developed, e.g. Design Thinking from the field of design, Lean Startup from the field of entrepreneurship, and agile development approaches from the field of software engineering. There are increased research efforts to investigate how to combine these approaches. However there is a lack of knowledge on how to train professionals in applying and integrating these approaches. This article describes a one-day training workshop based on the InnoDev model, developed in former research. InnoDev combines Design Thinking, Scrum and Lean Startup and is targeted at software developers, designers, and project managers in companies ranging from startups and SMEs to multinationals. Specifically, this article describes the workshop format and reports on the participants perceptions of the combined approach and the workshop experience. Overall participants had a positive experience in our workshop, became aware of new tools and techniques for software development, and perceived the combination of three innovation approaches as applicable and beneficial within their companies.
Franziska Dobrigkeit, Danielly F. O. de Paula, Noel Carroll
CSEE&T2
2019 Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering
abstract
This industry case study explores where and how Design Thinking supports software development teams in their endeavour to create innovative software solutions. Design Thinking has found its way into software companies ranging from startups to SMEs and multinationals. It is mostly seen as a human centered innovation approach or a way to elicit requirements in a more agile fashion. However, research in Design Thinking suggests that being exposed to DT changes the mindset of employees. Thus this article aims to explore the wider use of DT within software companies through a case study in a multinational organization. Our results indicate, that once trained in DT, employees find various ways to implement it not only as a pre-phase to software development but throughout their projects even applying it to aspects of their surroundings such as the development process, team spaces and team work. Specifically we present a model of how DT manifests itself in a software development company.
Franziska Dobrigkeit, Danielly F. O. de Paula
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE2