Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sudhir B. Kylasa
dblp:146/9491
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-4685-3012ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 28% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 22% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
alternating direction method of multipliers |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Newton-ADMM: a distributed GPU-accelerated optimizer for multiclass classification problems · SC 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Newton-ADMM: a distributed GPU-accelerated optimizer for multiclass classification problems · SC 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Newton-ADMM: a distributed GPU-accelerated optimizer for multiclass classification problems · SC 2020 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › CPU-GPU heterogeneous computing
CPU-GPU co-processing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling
kernel scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
molecular dynamics simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems › molecular dynamics simulation
reactive force field |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Distributed systems
distributed cluster computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing
MPI |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral penalty parameter selection · 0.4newton's method · 0.4ADMM · 0.4pthreads · 0.3load balancing · 0.3communication minimization · 0.3MPI · 0.3CUDA · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Newton-ADMM: a distributed GPU-accelerated optimizer for multiclass classification problemsabstractFirst-order optimization techniques, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its variants, are widely used in machine learning applications due to their simplicity and low per-iteration costs. However, they often require larger numbers of iterations, with associated communication costs in distributed environments. In contrast, Newton-type methods, while having higher per-iteration computation costs, typically require a significantly smaller number of iterations, which directly translates to reduced communication costs. We present a novel distributed optimizer for classification problems, which integrates a GPU-accelerated Newton-type solver with the global consensus formulation of Alternating Direction of Method Multipliers (ADMM). By leveraging the communication efficiency of ADMM, a highly efficient GPUaccelerated inexact-Newton solver, and an effective spectral penalty parameter selection strategy, we show that our proposed method (i) yields better generalization performance on several classification problems; (ii) significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in distributed time to solution; and (iii) offers better scaling on large distributed platforms. Chih-Hao Fang, Sudhir B. Kylasa, Fred (Farbod) Roosta, Michael W. Mahoney, Ananth Grama |
SC | 2 |
| 2019 | GPU Accelerated Sub-Sampled Newton's Method for Convex Classification ProblemsabstractFirst order optimization methods, which rely only on gradient information, are commonly used in diverse machine learning (ML) applications, owing to their simplicity of implementations and low per-iteration computational/storage costs. However, they suffer from significant disadvantages; most notably, their performance degrades with increasing problem ill-conditioning. Furthermore, they often involve a large number of hyperparameters, and are notoriously sensitive to parameters such as the step-size. By incorporating additional information from the Hessian, second-order methods, have been shown to be resilient to many such adversarial effects. However, these advantages come at the expense of higher per-iteration costs, which in “big data” regimes, can be computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we show that, contrary to conventional belief, second-order methods, when designed suitably, can be much more efficient than first-order alternatives for large-scale ML applications. In convex settings, we show that variants of classical Newton's method in which the Hessian and/or gradient are randomly subsampled, coupled with efficient GPU implementations, far outperform state of the art implementations of existing techniques in popular ML software packages such as TensorFlow. We show that our proposed methods (i) achieve better generalization errors in significantly lower wall-clock time – orders of magnitude faster, compared to first-order alternatives (in TensorFlow) and, (ii) offers significantly smaller (and easily parameterized) hyperparameter space making our methods highly robust. Sudhir B. Kylasa, Fred (Farbod) Roosta, Michael W. Mahoney, Ananth Grama |
SDM | 1 |
| 2017 | Reactive Molecular Dynamics on Massively Parallel Heterogeneous ArchitecturesabstractWe present a parallel implementation of the ReaxFF force field on massively parallel heterogeneous architectures, called PuReMD-Hybrid. PuReMD, on which this work is based, along with its integration into LAMMPS, is currently used by a large number of research groups worldwide. Accelerating this important community codebase that implements a complex reactive force field poses a number of algorithmic, design, and optimization challenges, as we discuss in detail. In particular, different computational kernels are best suited to different computing substrates-CPUs or GPUs. Scheduling these computations requires complex resource management, as well as minimizing data movement across CPUs and GPUs. Integrating powerful nodes, each with multiple CPUs and GPUs, into clusters and utilizing the immense compute power of these clusters requires significant optimizations for minimizing communication and, potentially, redundant computations. From a programming model perspective, PuReMD-Hybrid relies on MPI across nodes, pthreads across cores, and CUDA on the GPUs to address these challenges. Using a variety of innovative algorithms and optimizations, we demonstrate that our code can achieve over 565-fold speedup compared to a single core implementation on a cluster of 36 state-of-the-art GPUs for complex systems. In terms of application performance, our code enables simulations of over 1.8M atoms in under 0.68 seconds per simulation time step. Sudhir B. Kylasa, Hasan Metin Aktulga, Ananth Grama |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |
| 2015 | Social ties and checkin sites: Connections and latent structures in Location Based Social NetworksabstractLocation Based Social Networks (LBSNs) integrate location-based facilities with social connectivity for delivering a variety of services, enhancing user experience, emergency/disaster management, and streamlining business processes. A number of recent research efforts have studied relationships between geolocation and social connectivity, social connectivity and preferences, and node attributes and strength of social ties. These efforts have successfully demonstrated prediction of various attributes based on social connectivity, mobility, dynamic checkin information etc., including prediction of user location as well as future checkin locations. Sudhir B. Kylasa, Giorgios Kollias, Ananth Grama |
ASONAM | 1 |