EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael K. K. Leung
dblp:146/9811
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 82% Medical and health informatics · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA processing
polyadenylation site prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Inference of the human polyadenylation code · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Inference of the Human Polyadenylation Code · RECOMB 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets · Proc. IEEE 2016 |
Medical and health informatics
genomic medicine |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets · Proc. IEEE 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › alternative splicing analysis
alternative splicing prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.9predictive modeling · 0.2deep neural network · 0.2bayesian methods · 0.2GPU training · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Inference of the human polyadenylation codeabstractMotivation: Processing of transcripts at the 3'-end involves cleavage at a polyadenylation site followed by the addition of a poly(A)-tail. By selecting which site is cleaved, the process of alternative polyadenylation enables genes to produce transcript isoforms with different 3'-ends. To facilitate the identification and treatment of disease-causing mutations that affect polyadenylation and to understand the sequence determinants underlying this regulatory process, a computational model that can accurately predict polyadenylation patterns from genomic features is desirable. Results: Previous works have focused on identifying candidate polyadenylation sites and classifying tissue-specific sites. By training on how multiple sites in genes are competitively selected for polyadenylation from 3'-end sequencing data, we developed a deep learning model that can predict the tissue-specific strength of a polyadenylation site in the 3' untranslated region of the human genome given only its genomic sequence. We demonstrate the model's broad utility on multiple tasks, without any application-specific training. The model can be used to predict which polyadenylation site is more likely to be selected in genes with multiple sites. It can be used to scan the 3' untranslated region to find candidate polyadenylation sites. It can be used to classify the pathogenicity of variants near annotated polyadenylation sites in ClinVar. It can also be used to anticipate the effect of antisense oligonucleotide experiments to redirect polyadenylation. We provide analysis on how different features affect the model's predictive performance and a method to identify sensitive regions of the genome at the single-based resolution that can affect polyadenylation regulation. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Michael K. K. Leung, Andrew Delong, Brendan J. Frey |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2017 | Inference of the Human Polyadenylation Code
Michael K. K. Leung, Andrew Delong, Brendan J. Frey |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2016 | Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data SetsabstractIn this paper, we provide an introduction to machine learning tasks that address important problems in genomic medicine. One of the goals of genomic medicine is to determine how variations in the DNA of individuals can affect the risk of different diseases, and to find causal explanations so that targeted therapies can be designed. Here we focus on how machine learning can help to model the relationship between DNA and the quantities of key molecules in the cell, with the premise that these quantities, which we refer to as cell variables, may be associated with disease risks. Modern biology allows high-throughput measurement of many such cell variables, including gene expression, splicing, and proteins binding to nucleic acids, which can all be treated as training targets for predictive models. With the growing availability of large-scale data sets and advanced computational techniques such as deep learning, researchers can help to usher in a new era of effective genomic medicine. Michael K. K. Leung, Andrew Delong, Babak Alipanahi, Brendan J. Frey |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 2014 | Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing codeabstractMOTIVATION: Alternative splicing (AS) is a regulated process that directs the generation of different transcripts from single genes. A computational model that can accurately predict splicing patterns based on genomic features and cellular context is highly desirable, both in understanding this widespread phenomenon, and in exploring the effects of genetic variations on AS. METHODS: Using a deep neural network, we developed a model inferred from mouse RNA-Seq data that can predict splicing patterns in individual tissues and differences in splicing patterns across tissues. Our architecture uses hidden variables that jointly represent features in genomic sequences and tissue types when making predictions. A graphics processing unit was used to greatly reduce the training time of our models with millions of parameters. RESULTS: We show that the deep architecture surpasses the performance of the previous Bayesian method for predicting AS patterns. With the proper optimization procedure and selection of hyperparameters, we demonstrate that deep architectures can be beneficial, even with a moderately sparse dataset. An analysis of what the model has learned in terms of the genomic features is presented. Michael K. K. Leung, Hui Yuan Xiong, Leo J. Lee, Brendan J. Frey |
Bioinform. | 1 |