Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alon Goldshuv

dblp:147/1258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 44% Distributed and cloud data management · 44% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning
massively parallel processing
0.212014
HAWQ: a massively parallel processing SQL engine in hadoop · SIGMOD Conference 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

UDP-based software interconnect · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 HAWQ: a massively parallel processing SQL engine in hadoop
abstract
HAWQ, developed at Pivotal, is a massively parallel processing SQL engine sitting on top of HDFS. As a hybrid of MPP database and Hadoop, it inherits the merits from both parties. It adopts a layered architecture and relies on the distributed file system for data replication and fault tolerance. In addition, it is standard SQL compliant, and unlike other SQL engines on Hadoop, it is fully transactional. This paper presents the novel design of HAWQ, including query processing, the scalable software interconnect based on UDP protocol, transaction management, fault tolerance, read optimized storage, the extensible framework for supporting various popular Hadoop based data stores and formats, and various optimization choices we considered to enhance the query performance. The extensive performance study shows that HAWQ is about 40x faster than Stinger, which is reported 35x-45x faster than the original Hive.
Lei Chang, Zhanwei Wang, Lirong Jian, Alon Goldshuv, Luke Lonergan, Jeffrey Cohen, Caleb Welton, Gavin Sherry, Milind Bhandarkar
SIGMOD Conference6