Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ningxi Liu
dblp:147/1512
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0578-0571ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 67% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
analog/mixed-signal accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › inference accelerator
neural network inference accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network inference
DNN inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › large-scale image classification
imagenet classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization-aware retraining · 0.8batch normalization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A Novel Drone RF Signal Enhancement Method Using Adaptive Phase-Compensated Wiener Filter for Improved DetectionabstractThe proliferation of unauthorized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) poses significant security risks, necessitating robust detection systems. However, in practical long-range surveillance scenarios, UAV signals often deteriorate due to severe attenuation and complex environmental interference, rendering traditional detection methods ineffective. To address this, this letter proposes a novel signal enhancement framework comprising an improved adaptive Wiener filter. We introduce a dynamic noise spectrum estimation strategy coupled with a decision-directed phase compensation mechanism. This approach effectively suppresses non-stationary background noise while reconstructing high-fidelity time-frequency features by rectifying phase distortions. Experimental results on a proprietary real-world dataset demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves signal quality, enabling high-accuracy detection using YOLO models even in ultra-low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) regimes compared to raw data-based baselines. Peizhou Liu, Zan Li 0001, Ningxi Liu, Chao Wang 0028, Jiangbo Si |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 5 |
| 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning InferenceabstractAnalog/mixed-signal (AMS) computation can be more energy efficient than digital approaches for deep learning inference, but incurs an accuracy penalty from precision loss. Prior AMS approaches focus on small networks/datasets, which can maintain accuracy even with 2b precision. We analyze applicability of AMS approaches to larger networks by proposing a generic AMS error model, implementing it in an existing training framework, and investigating its effect on ImageNet classification with ResNet-50. We demonstrate significant accuracy recovery by exposing the network to AMS error during retraining, and we show that batch normalization layers are responsible for this accuracy recovery. We also introduce an energy model to predict the requirements of high-accuracy AMS hardware running large networks and use it to show that for ADC-dominated designs, there is a direct tradeoff between energy efficiency and network accuracy. Our model predicts that achieving < 0.4% accuracy loss on ResNet-50 with AMS hardware requires a computation energy of at least ~300 fJ/MAC. Finally, we propose methods for improving the energy-accuracy tradeoff. Angad Rekhi, Brian Zimmer, Nikola Nedovic, Ningxi Liu, Rangharajan Venkatesan, Miaorong Wang, Brucek Khailany, William J. Dally, C. Thomas Gray |
DAC | 4 |