Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Kernert
dblp:147/2923
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0002-2693-3960ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 87% Parallel and multicore computing · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Indexing and storage engines · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Assaying Out-Of-Distribution Generalization in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Assaying Out-Of-Distribution Generalization in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra
matrix multiplication |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Topology-aware optimization of big sparse matrices and matrix multiplications on main-memory systems · ICDE 2016 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Topology-aware optimization of big sparse matrices and matrix multiplications on main-memory systems · ICDE 2016 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
multicore optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Topology-aware optimization of big sparse matrices and matrix multiplications on main-memory systems · ICDE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 0.6calibration error · 0.6adversarial attack · 0.6multidimensional data partitioning · 0.5dynamic rewrites · 0.5cardinality estimation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Testing Granger Non-Causality in Panels with Cross-Sectional DependenciesabstractThis paper proposes a new approach for testing Granger non-causality on panel data. Instead of aggregating panel member statistics, we aggregate their corresponding p-values and show that the resulting p-value approximately bounds the type I error by the chosen significance level even if the panel members are dependent. We compare our approach against the most widely used Granger causality algorithm on panel data and show that our approach yields lower FDR at the same power for large sample sizes and panels with cross sectional dependencies. Finally, we examine COVID-19 data about confirmed cases and deaths measured in countries/regions worldwide and show that our approach is able to discover the true causal relation between confirmed cases and deaths while state-of-the-art approaches fail. Lenon Minorics, Ali Caner Türkmen, David Kernert, Patrick Blöbaum, Laurent Callot, Dominik Janzing |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2022 | Assaying Out-Of-Distribution Generalization in Transfer LearningabstractSince out-of-distribution generalization is a generally ill-posed problem, various proxy targets (e.g., calibration, adversarial robustness, algorithmic corruptions, invariance across shifts) were studied across different research programs resulting in different recommendations. While sharing the same aspirational goal, these approaches have never been tested under the same experimental conditions on real data. In this paper, we take a unified view of previous work, highlighting message discrepancies that we address empirically, and providing recommendations on how to measure the robustness of a model and how to improve it. To this end, we collect 172 publicly available dataset pairs for training and out-of-distribution evaluation of accuracy, calibration error, adversarial attacks, environment invariance, and synthetic corruptions. We fine-tune over 31k networks, from nine different architectures in the many- and few-shot setting. Our findings confirm that in- and out-of-distribution accuracies tend to increase jointly, but show that their relation is largely dataset-dependent, and in general more nuanced and more complex than posited by previous, smaller scale studies. Florian Wenzel, Andrea Dittadi, Peter V. Gehler, Carl-Johann Simon-Gabriel, Max Horn, Dominik Zietlow, David Kernert, Chris Russell 0001, Thomas Brox, Bernt Schiele, Bernhard Schölkopf, Francesco Locatello |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2016 | Topology-aware optimization of big sparse matrices and matrix multiplications on main-memory systemsabstractSince data sizes of analytical applications are continuously growing, many data scientists are switching from customized micro-solutions to scalable alternatives, such as statistical and scientific databases. However, many algorithms in data mining and science are expressed in terms of linear algebra, which is barely supported by major database vendors and big data solutions. On the other side, conventional linear algebra algorithms and legacy matrix representations are often not suitable for very large matrices. We propose a strategy for large matrix processing on modern multicore systems that is based on a novel, adaptive tile matrix representation (AT MATRIX). Our solution utilizes multiple techniques inspired from database technology, such as multidimensional data partitioning, cardinality estimation, indexing, dynamic rewrites, and many more in order to optimize the execution time. Based thereon we present a matrix multiplication operator ATMULT, which outperforms alternative approaches. The aim of our solution is to overcome the burden for data scientists of selecting appropriate algorithms and matrix storage representations. We evaluated AT MATRIX together with ATMULT on several real-world and synthetic random matrices. David Kernert, Wolfgang Lehner, Frank Köhler |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2015 | From Static to Agile - Interactive Particle Physics Analysis in the SAP HANA DBabstractAbstract: In order to confirm their theoretical assumptions, physicists employ Monte-Carlo generators to produce millions of simulated particle collision events and compare them with the results of the detector experiments. The traditional, static analysis workflow of physicists involves creating and compiling a C++ program for each study, and loading large data files for every run of their program. To make this process more interactive and agile, we created an application that loads the data into the relational in-memory column store DBMS SAP HANA, exposes raw particle data as database views and offers an interactive web interface to explore this data. We expressed common particle physics analysis algorithms using SQL queries to benefit from the inherent scalability and parallelization of the DBMS. In this paper we compare the two approaches, i.e. manual analysis with C++ programs and interactive analysis with SAP HANA. We demonstrate the tuning of the physical database schema and the SQL queries used for the application. Moreover, we show the web-based interface that allows for interactive analysis of the simulation data generated by the EPOS Monte-Carlo generator, which is developed in conjunction with the ALICE experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), CERN. 1 David Kernert, Norman May, Michael Hladik, Klaus Werner 0005, Wolfgang Lehner |
DATA | 1 |
| 2015 | SpMacho - Optimizing Sparse Linear Algebra Expressions with Probabilistic Density EstimationabstractIn the age of statistical and scientific databases, there is an emerging trend of integrating analytical algorithms into database systems. Many of these algorithms are based on linear algebra with large, sparse matrices. However, linear algebra expressions often contain multiplications of more then two matrices. The execution of sparse matrix chains is nontrivial, since the runtime depends on the parenthesization and on physical properties of intermediate results. Our approach targets to overcome the burden for data scientists of selecting appropriate algorithms, matrix storage representations, and execution paths. In this paper, we present a sparse matrix chain optimizer (SpMachO) that creates an execution plan, which is composed of multiplication operators and transformations between sparse and dense matrix storage representations. We introduce a comprehensive cost model for sparse-, dense- and hybrid multiplication kernels. Moreover, we propose a sparse matrix product density estimator (SpProdest) for intermediate result matrices. We evaluated SpMachO and SpProdest using real-world matrices and random matrix chains. David Kernert, Frank Köhler, Wolfgang Lehner |
EDBT | 1 |
| 2014 | SLACID - sparse linear algebra in a column-oriented in-memory database systemabstractScientific computations and analytical business applications are often based on linear algebra operations on large, sparse matrices. With the hardware shift of the primary storage from disc into memory it is now feasible to execute linear algebra queries directly in the database engine. This paper presents and compares different approaches of storing sparse matrices in an in-memory column-oriented database system. We show that a system layout derived from the compressed sparse row representation integrates well with a columnar database design and that the resulting architecture is moreover amenable to a wide range of non-numerical use cases when dictionary encoding is used. Dynamic matrix manipulation operations, like online insertion or deletion of elements, are not covered by most linear algebra frameworks. Therefore, we present a hybrid architecture that consists of a read-optimized main and a write-optimized delta structure and evaluate the performance for dynamic sparse matrix workloads by applying workflows of nuclear science and network graphs. David Kernert, Frank Köhler, Wolfgang Lehner |
SSDBM | 1 |