Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cencheng Shen
dblp:147/4327
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1030-1432ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Graph learning · 69% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 16% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 87% Data mining · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 43% Mathematical optimization · 28% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 28% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
1.7 | 2 | 2026 | Graph Neural Networks Powered by Encoder Embedding for Improved Node Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 One-Hot Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.6 | 2 | 2026 | Graph Neural Networks Powered by Encoder Embedding for Improved Node Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 A Simple Spectral Failure Mode for Graph Convolutional Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Neural Networks Powered by Encoder Embedding for Improved Node Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query expansion |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Consensus-Anchored Expansion for Noise-Resilient Re-ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Consensus-Anchored Expansion for Noise-Resilient Re-ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
reranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Consensus-Anchored Expansion for Noise-Resilient Re-ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | One-Hot Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Simple Spectral Failure Mode for Graph Convolutional Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Simple Spectral Failure Mode for Graph Convolutional Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
spectral embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Simple Spectral Failure Mode for Graph Convolutional Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
oblique decision tree |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
sparse representation-based classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Representation Classification Beyond ℓ1 Minimization and the Subspace Assumption · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
tree ensembles |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
l1 minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Representation Classification Beyond ℓ1 Minimization and the Subspace Assumption · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › contract design
screening |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse Representation Classification Beyond ℓ1 Minimization and the Subspace Assumption · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Consensus-Anchored Expansion for Noise-Resilient Re-ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
graph learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Vertex Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
stochastic block model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Vertex Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
graph node classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | One-Hot Graph Encoder Embedding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral embedding · 1.3one-hot encoding · 1.3sparse-dense consensus · 1.0one-hot graph encoder embedding · 1.0geometric gating · 1.0feature initialization · 1.0cross-encoder · 1.0screening · 0.9latent subspace model · 0.9adjacency spectral embedding · 0.8generative model · 0.6random projection · 0.4gradient boosted trees · 0.4sparse representation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Consensus-Anchored Expansion for Noise-Resilient Re-rankingabstractDense retrievers bridge vocabulary gaps but suffer from semantic drift, ranking topically similar passages that are not actually relevant to the query. Sparse retrievers like BM25 are generally less prone to such false positives but miss paraphrases. We observe that these failure modes are complementary, with relevant passages concentrated in regions where both retrievers score highly, while single-retriever confidence proves unreliable. Building on this insight, we propose AgreRank, a re-ranking method that leverages sparse-dense consensus for query expansion. AgreRank identifies anchor documents where both retrievers agree, expands the query through these verified anchors, and applies geometric gating to suppress drift from the original intent. On TREC Deep Learning 2021 and 2022, AgreRank improves over Dense+CE by 3.4--5.7% and over RRF+CE by 3.7--5.6% under identical retrieval and reranking components, achieving nDCG@10 of 0.706 and 0.627 with a lightweight 33M-parameter cross-encoder. These gains require no additional parameters or training, demonstrating that more effective use of retrieval signals offers a practical alternative to model scaling. Nischal Subedi, Cencheng Shen |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2026 | Graph Neural Networks Powered by Encoder Embedding for Improved Node LearningabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful framework for a wide range of node-level graph learning tasks. However, their performance typically depends on random or minimally informed initial feature representations, where poor initialization can lead to slower convergence and increased training instability. In this paper, we address this limitation by leveraging a statistically grounded one-hot graph encoder embedding (GEE) as a high-quality, structure-aware initialization for node features. Integrating GEE into standard GNNs yields the GEE-powered GNN (GG) framework. Across extensive simulations and real-world benchmarks, GG provides consistent and substantial performance gains in both unsupervised and supervised settings. For node classification, we further introduce GG-C, which concatenates the outputs of GG and GEE and outperforms competing methods, achieving roughly 10-50% accuracy improvements across most datasets. These results demonstrate the importance of principled, structure-aware initialization for improving the efficiency, stability, and overall performance of graph neural network architecture, enabling models to better exploit graph topology from the outset. Cencheng Shen, Youngser Park, Carey E. Priebe |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2024 | Synergistic graph fusion via encoder embedding
Cencheng Shen, Carey E. Priebe, Jonathan Larson, Ha Trinh |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2024 | Discovering the signal subgraph: An iterative screening approach on graphs
Cencheng Shen, Shangsi Wang, Alexandra Badea, Carey E. Priebe, Joshua T. Vogelstein |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 1 |
| 2023 | One-Hot Graph Encoder EmbeddingabstractIn this article we propose a lightning fast graph embedding method called one-hot graph encoder embedding. It has a linear computational complexity and the capacity to process billions of edges within minutes on standard PC - making it an ideal candidate for huge graph processing. It is applicable to either adjacency matrix or graph Laplacian, and can be viewed as a transformation of the spectral embedding. Under random graph models, the graph encoder embedding is approximately normally distributed per vertex, and asymptotically converges to its mean. We showcase three applications: vertex classification, vertex clustering, and graph bootstrap. In every case, the graph encoder embedding exhibits unrivalled computational advantages. Cencheng Shen, Qizhe Wang, Carey E. Priebe |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2022 | A Simple Spectral Failure Mode for Graph Convolutional NetworksabstractNeural networks have achieved remarkable successes in machine learning tasks. This has recently been extended to graph learning using neural networks. However, there is limited theoretical work in understanding how and when they perform well, especially relative to established statistical learning techniques such as spectral embedding. In this short paper, we present a simple generative model where unsupervised graph convolutional network fails, while the adjacency spectral embedding succeeds. Specifically, unsupervised graph convolutional network is unable to look beyond the first eigenvector in certain approximately regular graphs, thus missing inference signals in non-leading eigenvectors. The phenomenon is demonstrated by visual illustrations and comprehensive simulations. Carey E. Priebe, Cencheng Shen, Ningyuan Huang |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2020 | Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer ForestsabstractDecision forests, including Random Forests and Gradient Boosting Trees, have recently demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in a variety of machine learning settings. Decision forests are typically ensembles of axis-aligned decision trees; that is, trees that split only along feature dimensions. In contrast, many recent extensions to decision forests are based on axis-oblique splits. Unfortunately, these extensions forfeit one or more of the favorable properties of decision forests based on axis-aligned splits, such as robustness to many noise dimensions, interpretability, or computational efficiency. We introduce yet another decision forest, called “Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests” (SPORF). SPORF trees recursively split along very sparse random projections. Our method significantly improves accuracy over existing state-of-the-art algorithms on a standard benchmark suite for classification with $>100$ problems of varying dimension, sample size, and number of classes. To illustrate how SPORF addresses the limitations of both axis-aligned and existing oblique decision forest methods, we conduct extensive simulated experiments. SPORF typically yields improved performance over existing decision forest methods, while mitigating computational efficiency and scalability and maintaining interpretability. Very sparse random projections can be incorporated into gradient boosted trees to obtain potentially similar gains. Tyler M. Tomita, James Browne, Cencheng Shen, Jaewon Chung, Jesse Patsolic, Benjamin Falk, Carey E. Priebe, Jason Yim, Randal C. Burns, Mauro Maggioni, Joshua T. Vogelstein |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2020 | Sparse Representation Classification Beyond ℓ1 Minimization and the Subspace AssumptionabstractThe sparse representation classifier (SRC) has been utilized in various classification problems, which makes use of ℓ1 minimization and works well for image recognition satisfying a subspace assumption. In this paper we propose a new implementation of SRC via screening, establish its equivalence to the original SRC under regularity conditions, and prove its classification consistency under a latent subspace model and contamination. The results are demonstrated via simulations and real data experiments, where the new algorithm achieves comparable numerical performance and significantly faster. Cencheng Shen, Yuexiao Dong, Carey E. Priebe |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2017 | Manifold matching using shortest-path distance and joint neighborhood selection
Cencheng Shen, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Carey E. Priebe |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 1 |
| 2016 | Robust Vertex ClassificationabstractFor random graphs distributed according to stochastic blockmodels, a special case of latent position graphs, adjacency spectral embedding followed by appropriate vertex classification is asymptotically Bayes optimal; but this approach requires knowledge of and critically depends on the model dimension. In this paper, we propose a sparse representation vertex classifier which does not require information about the model dimension. This classifier represents a test vertex as a sparse combination of the vertices in the training set and uses the recovered coefficients to classify the test vertex. We prove consistency of our proposed classifier for stochastic blockmodels, and demonstrate that the sparse representation classifier can predict vertex labels with higher accuracy than adjacency spectral embedding approaches via both simulation studies and real data experiments. Our results demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of our proposed vertex classifier when the model dimension is unknown. Cencheng Shen, Joshua T. Vogelstein, Carey E. Priebe |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |