Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vivek Gokuladas

dblp:147/9138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 46% Information retrieval · 23% Indexing and storage engines · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
caching
0.212014
CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search · SIGIR 2014
Recommender systems › content recommendation
citation recommendation
0.212014
CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search · SIGIR 2014
Recommender systems › content recommendation › citation recommendation
context-aware citation recommendation
0.212014
CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search · SIGIR 2014
Graph data management
citation network
0.112014
CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search · SIGIR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

context-coupling · 0.2active cache-warming · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search
abstract
A person often uses a single search engine for very different tasks. For example, an author editing a manuscript may use the same academic search engine to find the latest work on a particular topic or to find the correct citation for a familiar article. The author's tolerance for latency and accuracy may vary according to task. However, search engines typically employ a consistent approach for processing all queries. In this paper we explore how a range of search needs and expectations can be supported within a single search system using differential search. We introduce CiteSight, a system that provides personalized citation recommendations to author groups that vary based on task. CiteSight presents cached recommendations instantaneously for online tasks (e.g., active paper writing), and refines these recommendations in the background for offline tasks (e.g., future literature review). We develop an active cache-warming process to enhance the system as the author works, and context-coupling, a technique for augment sparse citation networks. By evaluating the quality of the recommendations and collecting user feedback, we show that differential search can provide a high level of accuracy for different tasks on different time scales. We believe that differential search can be used in many situations where the user's tolerance for latency and desired response vary dramatically based on use.
Avishay Livne, Vivek Gokuladas, Jaime Teevan, Susan T. Dumais, Eytan Adar
SIGIR2