Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anja Fast

dblp:148/1640 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.722021
Defect-Oriented Test: Effectiveness in High Volume Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2021
Cell-Aware Test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.722021
Defect-Oriented Test: Effectiveness in High Volume Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2021
Cell-Aware Test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
defect-based testing
0.512021
Defect-Oriented Test: Effectiveness in High Volume Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2021
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault coverage
0.512021
Defect-Oriented Test: Effectiveness in High Volume Manufacturing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2021
Electronic design automation › hardware test
cell-aware test
0.212014
Cell-Aware Test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

critical area analysis · 0.5cell-aware test · 0.5physical failure analysis · 0.2defect-based ATPG · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Defect-Oriented Test: Effectiveness in High Volume Manufacturing
abstract
This article describes a defect-oriented test (DOT) approach, which enables a complete physical defect-based automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) for the digital logic area of CMOS-based designs. Total critical area (TCA)-based methods are presented for the generation of needed DOT views to enable the generation of complete DOT-based patterns for detecting all cell-internal and as well all cell-external physical defects. The major aim of these new methods and patterns is to further reduce the defect rate of manufactured ICs, in addition to what is already achieved with traditional and cell-aware test (CAT) fault models. We present test results, including achieved defect rate reduction in defective parts per million (DPPM), from a large 14-nm FinFET design, including a correlation to system-level-test (SLT) fails. For a second, mature 160-nm automotive mixed-signal sensor we present high-volume production test results, again measured in DPPM, and we provide test coverage figures moving away from counting detected faults to calculating detected TCA which is reported as the chip level TCA coverage.
Friedrich Hapke, Will Howell, Peter C. Maxwell, Edward Brazil, Srikanth Venkataraman, Rudrajit Dutta, Andreas Glowatz, Anja Fast, Janusz Rajski
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.8
2018 DPPM Reduction Methods and New Defect Oriented Test Methods Applied to Advanced FinFET Technologies
abstract
This paper presents DPPM reduction results achieved with new Defect Oriented Test (DOT) methods/patterns applied to designs manufactured in advanced FinFET technologies. Focus of this paper is on Timing-Aware Cell-Aware Test (TA-CAT) patterns targeting small-delay defects of FinFET transistors, and a new DOT method which explicitly targets chip layout dependent cell-neighborhood defects. Test results from traditional Stuck-at/Transition patterns, from traditional CAT patterns, from TA-CAT patterns, and as well from cell-neighborhood patterns, applied to FinFET technology designs, will be presented in this paper. In addition, a correlation to System-Level-Test fails will be discussed.
Will Howell, Friedrich Hapke, Edward Brazil, Srikanth Venkataraman, R. Datta, Andreas Glowatz, Wilfried Redemund, J. Schmerberg, Anja Fast, Janusz Rajski
ITC9
2014 Cell-aware experiences in a high-quality automotive test suite
abstract
High quality is an absolute necessity for automotive designs. This paper describes an approach to improve the overall defect coverage for CMOS-based high quality automotive designs. We present results from a cell-aware (CA) characterization flow for 216 cells, the pattern generation flow for a 130nm smart power design, and high-volume production test results achieved after testing multimillion parts. The idea behind CA tests is to detect cell-internal (CI) bridges, opens, leaking and high resistive transistor defects which are undetected with state-of-the-art tests. The production test results have shown that the CA tests detect various failing parts during a first wafer sort test which still resulted into unique failing parts after a second wafer sort test done at a different temperature and with additional tests. The obtained results encouraged us to continue this work beyond this paper to run further experiments with the final goal to eliminate the stuck-at (SA) and transition delay (TR) test by simultaneously improving the quality with CA tests which are a superset of SA and TR tests.
Friedrich Hapke, Ralf Arnold, Matthias Beck, M. Baby, S. Straehle, J. F. Goncalves, A. Panait, R. Behr, Gwenolé Maugard, A. Prashanthi, Jürgen Schlöffel, Wilfried Redemund, Andreas Glowatz, Anja Fast, Janusz Rajski
ETS14
2014 Cell-Aware Test
abstract
This paper describes the new cell-aware test (CAT) approach, which enables a transistor-level and defect-based ATPG on full CMOS-based designs to significantly reduce the defect rate of manufactured ICs, including FinFET technologies. We present results from a defect-oriented CAT fault model generation for 1,940 standard library cells, as well as the application of CAT to several industrial designs. We present high volume production test results from a 32 nm notebook processor and from a 350 nm automotive design, including the achieved defect rate reduction in defective-parts-per-million. We also present CAT diagnosis and physical failure analysis results from one failing part and give an outlook for using the functionality for quickly ramping up the yield in advanced technology nodes.
Friedrich Hapke, Wilfried Redemund, Andreas Glowatz, Janusz Rajski, Michael Reese, Marek Hustava, Martin Keim, Jürgen Schlöffel, Anja Fast
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.9