Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andriy Derkach

dblp:148/4679 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-2178-8493ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
0.522018
Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies · Bioinform. 2018
Association analysis using next-generation sequence data from publicly available control groups: the robust variance score statistic · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › rare variant analysis
rare variant association testing
0.522018
Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies · Bioinform. 2018
Association analysis using next-generation sequence data from publicly available control groups: the robust variance score statistic · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.522018
Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies · Bioinform. 2018
Association analysis using next-generation sequence data from publicly available control groups: the robust variance score statistic · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
power analysis
0.312018
Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation study · 0.3analytic approximation · 0.3robust variance score statistic · 0.2likelihood-based method · 0.2expected genotype values · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Power Analysis for Genetic Association Test (PAGEANT) provides insights to challenges for rare variant association studies
abstract
Motivation: Genome-wide association studies are now shifting focus from analysis of common to rare variants. As power for association testing for individual rare variants may often be low, various aggregate level association tests have been proposed to detect genetic loci. Typically, power calculations for such tests require specification of large number of parameters, including effect sizes and allele frequencies of individual variants, making them difficult to use in practice. We propose to approximate power to a varying degree of accuracy using a smaller number of key parameters, including the total genetic variance explained by multiple variants within a locus. Results: We perform extensive simulation studies to assess the accuracy of the proposed approximations in realistic settings. Using these simplified power calculations, we develop an analytic framework to obtain bounds on genetic architecture of an underlying trait given results from genome-wide association studies with rare variants. Finally, we provide insights into the required quality of annotation/functional information for identification of likely causal variants to make meaningful improvement in power. Availability and implementation: A shiny application that allows a variety of Power Analysis of GEnetic AssociatioN Tests (PAGEANT), in R is made publicly available at https://andrewhaoyu.shinyapps.io/PAGEANT/. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andriy Derkach, Nilanjan Chatterjee
Bioinform.1
2014 Association analysis using next-generation sequence data from publicly available control groups: the robust variance score statistic
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sufficiently powered case-control studies with next-generation sequence (NGS) data remain prohibitively expensive for many investigators. If feasible, a more efficient strategy would be to include publicly available sequenced controls. However, these studies can be confounded by differences in sequencing platform; alignment, single nucleotide polymorphism and variant calling algorithms; read depth; and selection thresholds. Assuming one can match cases and controls on the basis of ethnicity and other potential confounding factors, and one has access to the aligned reads in both groups, we investigate the effect of systematic differences in read depth and selection threshold when comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls. We propose a novel likelihood-based method, the robust variance score (RVS), that substitutes genotype calls by their expected values given observed sequence data. RESULTS: We show theoretically that the RVS eliminates read depth bias in the estimation of minor allele frequency. We also demonstrate that, using simulated and real NGS data, the RVS method controls Type I error and has comparable power to the 'gold standard' analysis with the true underlying genotypes for both common and rare variants. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An RVS R script and instructions can be found at strug.research.sickkids.ca, and at https://github.com/strug-lab/RVS. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andriy Derkach, Theodore Chiang, Jiafen Gong, Laura Addis, Sara E. Dobbins, Ian Tomlinson, Richard S. Houlston, Deb K. Pal, Lisa J. Strug
Bioinform.1