Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cheongjae Jang

dblp:148/4946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6029-4125ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Graph learning · 32% Optimization for machine learning · 10%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 56% Mathematical optimization · 44%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
1.422024
Graph Geometry-Preserving Autoencoders · ICML 2024
Geometrically regularized autoencoders for non-Euclidean data · ICLR 2023
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
statistical distance
1.012026
On the Information Processing of One-Dimensional Wasserstein Distances with Finite Samples · AAAI 2026
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance
1.012026
On the Information Processing of One-Dimensional Wasserstein Distances with Finite Samples · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph regularization
graph laplacian regularization
0.812024
Graph Geometry-Preserving Autoencoders · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.812024
Graph Geometry-Preserving Autoencoders · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
edge of stability
0.712023
A new characterization of the edge of stability based on a sharpness measure aware of batch gradient distribution · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.712023
A new characterization of the edge of stability based on a sharpness measure aware of batch gradient distribution · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
non-euclidean data
0.712023
Geometrically regularized autoencoders for non-Euclidean data · ICLR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.712023
DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.612022
A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information Geometry · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.612022
A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information Geometry · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
sharpness measures
0.612022
A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information Geometry · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.212023
A new characterization of the edge of stability based on a sharpness measure aware of batch gradient distribution · ICLR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein structure refinement
0.212023
DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
side-chain prediction
0.212023
DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

poisson process · 1.0neural spike train decoding · 1.0riemannian geometry · 0.8graph laplacian · 0.8sharpness measure · 0.7molecular mechanics energy function · 0.7geometric regularization · 0.7deep neural network · 0.7conformational space annealing · 0.7conditional random field · 0.7batch gradient distribution · 0.7autoencoder · 0.7regularization · 0.6information geometry · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On the Information Processing of One-Dimensional Wasserstein Distances with Finite Samples
abstract
Leveraging the Wasserstein distance—a summation of sample-wise transport distances in data space—is advantageous in many applications for measuring support differences between two underlying density functions. However, when supports significantly overlap while densities exhibit substantial pointwise differences, it remains unclear whether and how this transport information can accurately identify these differences, particularly their analytic characterization in finite-sample settings. We address this issue by conducting an analysis of the information processing capabilities of the one-dimensional Wasserstein distance with finite samples. By utilizing the Poisson process and isolating the rate factor, we demonstrate the capability of capturing the pointwise density difference with Wasserstein distances and how this information harmonizes with support differences. The analyzed properties are confirmed using neural spike train decoding and amino acid contact frequency data. The results reveal that the one-dimensional Wasserstein distance highlights meaningful density differences related to both rate and support.
Cheongjae Jang, Jong-Hyun Won, Soyeon Jun, Chun Kee Chung, Keehyoung Joo, Yung-Kyun Noh
AAAI1
2025 How Classifier Features Transfer to Downstream: An Asymptotic Analysis in a Two-Layer Model
abstract
Neural networks learn effective feature representations, which can be transferred to new tasks without additional training. While larger datasets are known to improve feature transfer, the theoretical conditions for the success of such transfer remain unclear. This work investigates feature transfer in networks trained for classification to identify the conditions that enable effective clustering in unseen classes. We first reveal that higher similarity between training and unseen distributions leads to improved Cohesion and Separability. We then show that feature expressiveness is enhanced when inputs are similar to the training classes, while the features of irrelevant inputs remain indistinguishable. We validate our analysis on synthetic and benchmark datasets, including CAR, CUB, SOP, ISC, and ImageNet. Our analysis highlights the importance of the similarity between training classes and the input distribution for successful feature transfer.
Hee Bin Yoo, Sungyoon Lee, Cheongjae Jang, Dong-Sig Han, Jaein Kim 0004, Seunghyeon Lim, Byoung-Tak Zhang
NeurIPS3
2024 Graph Geometry-Preserving Autoencoders
abstract
When using an autoencoder to learn the low-dimensional manifold of high-dimensional data, it is crucial to find the latent representations that preserve the geometry of the data manifold. However, most existing studies assume a Euclidean nature for the high-dimensional data space, which is arbitrary and often does not precisely reflect the underlying semantic or domain-specific attributes of the data. In this paper, we propose a novel autoencoder regularization framework based on the premise that the geometry of the data manifold can often be better captured with a well-designed similarity graph associated with data points. Given such a graph, we utilize a Riemannian geometric distortion measure as a regularizer to preserve the geometry derived from the graph Laplacian and make it suitable for larger-scale autoencoder training. Through extensive experiments, we show that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art geometry-preserving and graph-based autoencoders with respect to learning accurate latent structures that preserve the graph geometry, and is particularly effective in learning dynamics in the latent space. Code is available at https://github.com/JungbinLim/GGAE-public.
Jungbin Lim, Yonghyeon Lee, Cheongjae Jang, Frank C. Park 0001
ICML4
2023 Geometrically regularized autoencoders for non-Euclidean data
Cheongjae Jang, Yonghyeon Lee, Yung-Kyun Noh, Frank C. Park 0001
ICLR1
2023 A new characterization of the edge of stability based on a sharpness measure aware of batch gradient distribution
Sungyoon Lee, Cheongjae Jang
ICLR2
2023 DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function
abstract
MOTIVATION: Predicting protein structures with high accuracy is a critical challenge for the broad community of life sciences and industry. Despite progress made by deep neural networks like AlphaFold2, there is a need for further improvements in the quality of detailed structures, such as side-chains, along with protein backbone structures. RESULTS: Building upon the successes of AlphaFold2, the modifications we made include changing the losses of side-chain torsion angles and frame aligned point error, adding loss functions for side chain confidence and secondary structure prediction, and replacing template feature generation with a new alignment method based on conditional random fields. We also performed re-optimization by conformational space annealing using a molecular mechanics energy function which integrates the potential energies obtained from distogram and side-chain prediction. In the CASP15 blind test for single protein and domain modeling (109 domains), DeepFold ranked fourth among 132 groups with improvements in the details of the structure in terms of backbone, side-chain, and Molprobity. In terms of protein backbone accuracy, DeepFold achieved a median GDT-TS score of 88.64 compared with 85.88 of AlphaFold2. For TBM-easy/hard targets, DeepFold ranked at the top based on Z-scores for GDT-TS. This shows its practical value to the structural biology community, which demands highly accurate structures. In addition, a thorough analysis of 55 domains from 39 targets with publicly available structures indicates that DeepFold shows superior side-chain accuracy and Molprobity scores among the top-performing groups. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepFold tools are open-source software available at https://github.com/newtonjoo/deepfold.
Jae-Won Lee, Jong-Hyun Won, Seonggwang Jeon, Yujin Choo, Yubin Yeon, Jin-Seon Oh, Seonhwa Kim, InSuk Joung, Cheongjae Jang, Sung Jong Lee, Kyong Hwan Jin, Giltae Song, Eun-Sol Kim, Jejoong Yoo, Eunok Paek, Yung-Kyun Noh, Keehyoung Joo
Bioinform.10
2022 A Reparametrization-Invariant Sharpness Measure Based on Information Geometry
abstract
It has been observed that the generalization performance of neural networks correlates with the sharpness of their loss landscape. Dinh et al. (2017) have observed that existing formulations of sharpness measures fail to be invariant with respect to scaling and reparametrization. While some scale-invariant measures have recently been proposed, reparametrization-invariant measures are still lacking. Moreover, they often do not provide any theoretical insights into generalization performance nor lead to practical use to improve the performance. Based on an information geometric analysis of the neural network parameter space, in this paper we propose a reparametrization-invariant sharpness measure that captures the change in loss with respect to changes in the probability distribution modeled by neural networks, rather than with respect to changes in the parameter values. We reveal some theoretical connections of our measure to generalization performance. In particular, experiments confirm that using our measure as a regularizer in neural network training significantly improves performance.
Cheongjae Jang, Sungyoon Lee, Frank C. Park 0001, Yung-Kyun Noh
NeurIPS1
2016 Toward on-line parameter estimation of concentric tube robots using a mechanics-based kinematic model
abstract
Although existing mechanics-based models of concentric tube robots have been experimentally demonstrated to approximate the actual kinematics, determining accurate estimates of model parameters remains difficult due to the complex relationship between the parameters and available measurements. Further, because the mechanics-based models neglect some phenomena like friction, nonlinear elasticity, and cross section deformation, it is also not clear if model error is due to model simplification or to parameter estimation errors. The parameters of the superelastic materials used in these robots can be slowly time-varying, necessitating periodic re-estimation. This paper proposes a method for estimating the mechanics-based model parameters using an extended Kalman filter as a step toward on-line parameter estimation. Our methodology is validated through both simulation and experiments.
Cheongjae Jang, Junhyoung Ha, Pierre E. Dupont, Frank C. Park 0001
IROS1