Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pascal Kleber

dblp:148/6101 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2677-0428ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 56% Distributed and cloud data management · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
aggregation
0.512021
ROME: All Overlays Lead to Aggregation, but Some Are Faster than Others · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021
Distributed and cloud data management › distributed query processing
distributed aggregation
0.512021
ROME: All Overlays Lead to Aggregation, but Some Are Faster than Others · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021
Query processing and optimization › aggregation
online aggregation
0.112021
ROME: All Overlays Lead to Aggregation, but Some Are Faster than Others · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic optimization · 0.5experimental evaluation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 ROME: All Overlays Lead to Aggregation, but Some Are Faster than Others
abstract
Aggregation is common in data analytics and crucial to distilling information from large datasets, but current data analytics frameworks do not fully exploit the potential for optimization in such phases. The lack of optimization is particularly notable in current “online” approaches that store data in main memory across nodes, shifting the bottleneck away from disk I/O toward network and compute resources, thus increasing the relative performance impact of distributed aggregation phases. We present ROME, an aggregation system for use within data analytics frameworks or in isolation. ROME uses a set of novel heuristics based primarily on basic knowledge of aggregation functions combined with deployment constraints to efficiently aggregate results from computations performed on individual data subsets across nodes (e.g., merging sorted lists resulting from top- k ). The user can either provide minimal information that allows our heuristics to be applied directly, or ROME can autodetect the relevant information at little cost. We integrated ROME as a subsystem into the Spark and Flink data analytics frameworks. We use real-world data to experimentally demonstrate speedups up to 3× over single-level aggregation overlays, up to 21% over other multi-level overlays, and 50% for iterative algorithms like gradient descent at 100 iterations.
Marcel Blöcher, Emilio Coppa, Pascal Kleber, Patrick Eugster, William Culhane, Masoud Saeida Ardekani
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.3
2014 Modeling and execution of event stream processing in business processes
Stefan Appel, Pascal Kleber, Sebastian Frischbier, Tobias Freudenreich, Alejandro P. Buchmann
Inf. Syst.2