Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franc Ivankovic

dblp:149/1220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › plan optimization
optimal planning
0.212015
Optimal Planning with Axioms · IJCAI 2015
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Urban Traffic Control via Planning with Global State Constraints (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Planning with global state constraints is an extension of classical planning such that some properties of each state are derived via a set of rules common to all states. This approach is important for the application of planning techniques in manipulating cyber-physical systems, and has been shown to be effective in practice. Urban Traffic Control (UTC) deals with the control and management of traffic in urban regions, and includes the optimisation of traffic signals configuration to minimise traffic congestion and travel delays. In this paper, we briefly introduce how to cast the UTC problem into the formalism of planning with global state constraints, and we perform a preliminary experimental evaluation considering significant scenarios taken from the literature, and a new one based on real-world data. The results show that the approach is feasible, and the quality of generated solutions has been confirmed in simulation using existing symbolic models.
Franc Ivankovic, Mauro Vallati, Lukás Chrpa, Marco Roveri
SOCS1
2018 Extending Classical Planning with State Constraints: Heuristics and Search for Optimal Planning
abstract
We present a principled way of extending a classical AI planning formalism with systems of state constraints, which relate - sometimes determine - the values of variables in each state traversed by the plan. This extension occupies an attractive middle ground between expressivity and complexity. It enables modelling a new range of problems, as well as formulating more efficient models of classical planning problems. An example of the former is planning-based control of networked physical systems - power networks, for example - in which a local, discrete control action can have global effects on continuous quantities, such as altering flows across the entire network. At the same time, our extension remains decidable as long as the satisfiability of sets of state constraints is decidable, including in the presence of numeric state variables, and we demonstrate that effective techniques for cost-optimal planning known in the classical setting - in particular, relaxation-based admissible heuristics - can be adapted to the extended formalism. In this paper, we apply our approach to constraints in the form of linear or non-linear equations over numeric state variables, but the approach is independent of the type of state constraints, as long as there exists a procedure that decides their consistency. The planner and the constraint solver interact through a well-defined, narrow interface, in which the solver requires no specialisation to the planning context.
Patrik Haslum, Franc Ivankovic, Miquel Ramírez, Dan Gordon 0002, Sylvie Thiébaux, Vikas Shivashankar, Dana S. Nau
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2015 Optimal Planning with Axioms
Franc Ivankovic, Patrik Haslum
IJCAI1