Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ziwei Huo

dblp:149/1248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Logic in computer science · 87% Automated reasoning and model checking · 13%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
logic programming
0.632015
Simplifying A Logic Program Using Its Consequences · IJCAI 2015
Splitting a Logic Program Revisited · AAAI 2015
Elementary Loops Revisited · AAAI 2014
Logic in computer science › logic programming
answer set programming
0.422015
Simplifying A Logic Program Using Its Consequences · IJCAI 2015
Splitting a Logic Program Revisited · AAAI 2015
Logic in computer science › meta-logic
logical consequence
0.212015
Simplifying A Logic Program Using Its Consequences · IJCAI 2015
Automated reasoning and model checking
program transformation
0.212015
Simplifying A Logic Program Using Its Consequences · IJCAI 2015
Logic in computer science › nonmonotonic reasoning
answer set solving
0.212014
Elementary Loops Revisited · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

restricted unfolding · 0.2loop formulas · 0.2SAT-based computation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Splitting a Logic Program Revisited
abstract
Lifschitz and Turner introduced the notion of the splitting set and provided a method to divide a logic program into two parts. They showed that the task of computing the answer sets of the program can be converted into the tasks of computing the answer sets of these parts. However, the empty set and the set of all atoms are the only two splitting sets for many programs, then these programs cannot be divided by the splitting method. In this paper, we extend Lifschitz and Turner's splitting set theorem to allow the program to be split by an arbitrary set of atoms, while some new atoms may be introduced in the process. To illustrate the usefulness of the result, we show that for some typical programs the splitting process is efficient and the program simplification problem can be investigated using the concept of splitting.
Jianmin Ji, Hai Wan, Ziwei Huo, Zhenfeng Yuan
AAAI3
2015 Simplifying A Logic Program Using Its Consequences
Jianmin Ji, Hai Wan, Ziwei Huo, Zhenfeng Yuan
IJCAI3
2014 Elementary Loops Revisited
abstract
The notions of loops and loop formulas play an important role in answer set computation. However, there would be an exponential number of loops in the worst case. Gebser and Schaub characterized a subclass elementary loops and showed that they are sufficient for selecting answer sets from models of a logic program. This paper proposes an alternative definition of elementary loops and identify a subclass of elementary loops, called proper loops. By applying a special form of their loop formulas, proper loops are also sufficient for the SAT-based answer set computation. A polynomial algorithm to recognize a proper loop is given and shows that for certain logic programs, identifying all proper loops of a program is more efficient than that of elementary loops. Furthermore, we prove that, by considering the structure of the positive body-head dependency graph of a program, a large number of loops could be ignored for identifying proper loops. We provide another algorithm for identifying all proper loops of a program. The experiments show that, for certain programs whose dependency graphs consisting of sets of components that are densely connected inside and sparsely connected outside, the new algorithm is more efficient.
Jianmin Ji, Hai Wan, Peng Xiao 0009, Ziwei Huo, Zhanhao Xiao
AAAI4