Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Farzaneh Mirzazadeh

dblp:149/1268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Graph learning · 34% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Generative modeling · 17%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 61% Data mining · 16% Knowledge graphs · 13%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › optimization modeling
LLM-based optimization modeling
0.912025
Enhancing Decision Making Through the Integration of Large Language Models and Operations Research Optimization · AAAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimization modeling
0.912025
Enhancing Decision Making Through the Integration of Large Language Models and Operations Research Optimization · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph clustering
0.712023
GC-Flow: A Graph-Based Flow Network for Effective Clustering · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
GC-Flow: A Graph-Based Flow Network for Effective Clustering · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.712023
GC-Flow: A Graph-Based Flow Network for Effective Clustering · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
embedding learning
0.412019
Learning Embeddings into Entropic Wasserstein Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.412019
Alleviating Label Switching with Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.412019
Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference
0.412019
Alleviating Label Switching with Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2019
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document representation
0.412019
Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation · NeurIPS 2019
Information retrieval › similarity measure
document similarity
0.412019
Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation · NeurIPS 2019
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.412019
Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
entropic optimal transport
0.412019
Learning Embeddings into Entropic Wasserstein Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification
0.212015
Embedding Inference for Structured Multilabel Prediction · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction
0.212015
Embedding Inference for Structured Multilabel Prediction · NIPS 2015
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph embedding
entity embedding
0.212014
Convex Co-embedding · AAAI 2014
Data mining
representation learning
0.212014
Convex Co-embedding · AAAI 2014
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › nearest neighbor classification
k-nearest neighbor classification
0.112019
Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation · NeurIPS 2019
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.112014
Convex Co-embedding · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9word mover's distance · 0.8wasserstein space · 0.8hierarchical optimal transport · 0.8entropic regularization · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.7graph convolution · 0.7gaussian mixture · 0.7dynamic programming · 0.4optimal transport · 0.4monte carlo · 0.4maximum margin structured prediction · 0.2prototype-distance models · 0.2multi-linear models · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Enhancing Decision Making Through the Integration of Large Language Models and Operations Research Optimization
abstract
Many critical business and societal decisions in areas such as supply chain and healthcare involve numerous potential actions, complex constraints, and goals that can be modeled as objective functions. Mathematical optimization, a core area in Operations Research (OR), provides robust, mathematically grounded methodologies to address such decisions and has shown tremendous benefits in many applications. However, its application requires the creation of accurate and efficient optimization models, necessitating rare expertise and considerable time, creating a barrier to widespread adoption in decision-making. Thus, it is a long-standing goal to make these capabilities widely accessible. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities widely accessible through natural language. LLMs can accelerate expert work in creating formal models like computer programs, and emerging research indicates they can also speed up the development of optimization models by OR experts. We, therefore, propose integrating and advancing LLM and optimization modeling to empower organizational decision-makers to model and solve such complex problems without requiring deep expertise in optimization. In this work, we present our vision for democratizing optimization modeling for organizational decision-making by such a combination of LLMs and optimization modeling. We identify a set of fundamental requirements for the vision's implementation and describe the state of the art through a literature survey and some experimentation. We show that a) LLMs already provide substantial novel capabilities relevant to realizing this vision, but that b) major research challenges remain to be addressed. We also propose possible research directions to overcome these gaps. We would like this work to serve as a call to action to bring together the LLM and OR optimization modeling communities to pursue this vision, thereby enabling much more widespread improved decision-making and increasing by orders of magnitude the benefits AI and OR can bring to enterprises and society.
Segev Wasserkrug, Léonard Boussioux, Dick den Hertog, Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, S. Ilker Birbil, Jannis Kurtz, Donato Maragno
AAAI4
2023 GC-Flow: A Graph-Based Flow Network for Effective Clustering
abstract
Graph convolutional networks (GCNs) are *discriminative models* that directly model the class posterior $p(y|\mathbf{x})$ for semi-supervised classification of graph data. While being effective, as a representation learning approach, the node representations extracted from a GCN often miss useful information for effective clustering, because the objectives are different. In this work, we design normalizing flows that replace GCN layers, leading to a *generative model* that models both the class conditional likelihood $p(\mathbf{x}|y)$ and the class prior $p(y)$. The resulting neural network, GC-Flow, retains the graph convolution operations while being equipped with a Gaussian mixture representation space. It enjoys two benefits: it not only maintains the predictive power of GCN, but also produces well-separated clusters, due to the structuring of the representation space. We demonstrate these benefits on a variety of benchmark data sets. Moreover, we show that additional parameterization, such as that on the adjacency matrix used for graph convolutions, yields additional improvement in clustering.
Tianchun Wang, Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Xiang Zhang 0001
ICML2
2019 Learning Embeddings into Entropic Wasserstein Spaces
Charlie Frogner, Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Justin Solomon 0001
ICLR (Poster)2
2019 Alleviating Label Switching with Optimal Transport
abstract
Label switching is a phenomenon arising in mixture model posterior inference that prevents one from meaningfully assessing posterior statistics using standard Monte Carlo procedures. This issue arises due to invariance of the posterior under actions of a group; for example, permuting the ordering of mixture components has no effect on the likelihood. We propose a resolution to label switching that leverages machinery from optimal transport. Our algorithm efficiently computes posterior statistics in the quotient space of the symmetry group. We give conditions under which there is a meaningful solution to label switching and demonstrate advantages over alternative approaches on simulated and real data.
Pierre Monteiller, Sebastian Claici, Edward Chien, Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Justin Solomon 0001, Mikhail Yurochkin
NeurIPS4
2019 Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Document Representation
abstract
The ability to measure similarity between documents enables intelligent summarization and analysis of large corpora. Past distances between documents suffer from either an inability to incorporate semantic similarities between words or from scalability issues. As an alternative, we introduce hierarchical optimal transport as a meta-distance between documents, where documents are modeled as distributions over topics, which themselves are modeled as distributions over words. We then solve an optimal transport problem on the smaller topic space to compute a similarity score. We give conditions on the topics under which this construction defines a distance, and we relate it to the word mover's distance. We evaluate our technique for k-NN classification and show better interpretability and scalability with comparable performance to current methods at a fraction of the cost.
Mikhail Yurochkin, Sebastian Claici, Edward Chien, Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Justin Solomon 0001
NeurIPS4
2015 Embedding Inference for Structured Multilabel Prediction
abstract
A key bottleneck in structured output prediction is the need for inference during training and testing, usually requiring some form of dynamic programming. Rather than using approximate inference or tailoring a specialized inference method for a particular structure---standard responses to the scaling challenge---we propose to embed prediction constraints directly into the learned representation. By eliminating the need for explicit inference a more scalable approach to structured output prediction can be achieved, particularly at test time. We demonstrate the idea for multi-label prediction under subsumption and mutual exclusion constraints, where a relationship to maximum margin structured output prediction can be established. Experiments demonstrate that the benefits of structured output training can still be realized even after inference has been eliminated.
Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Nan Ding 0002, Dale Schuurmans
NIPS1
2015 Scalable Metric Learning for Co-Embedding
Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Martha White, András György 0001, Dale Schuurmans
ECML/PKDD (1)1
2014 Convex Co-embedding
abstract
We present a general framework for association learning, where entities are embedded in a common latent space to express relatedness by geometry -- an approach that underlies the state of the art for link prediction, relation learning, multi-label tagging, relevance retrieval and ranking. Although current approaches rely on local training applied to non-convex formulations, we demonstrate how general convex formulations can be achieved for entity embedding, both for standard multi-linear and prototype-distance models. We investigate an efficient optimization strategy that allows scaling. An experimental evaluation reveals the advantages of global training in different case studies.
Farzaneh Mirzazadeh, Yuhong Guo, Dale Schuurmans
AAAI1