Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qicong Chen

dblp:149/1347 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-3903-5361ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Web and social media mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
information diffusion
0.212015
RAIN: Social Role-Aware Information Diffusion · AAAI 2015
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.212015
RAIN: Social Role-Aware Information Diffusion · AAAI 2015
Web and social media mining › user behavior analysis
social role identification
0.212015
RAIN: Social Role-Aware Information Diffusion · AAAI 2015
Web and social media mining
social influence
0.212014
How Do Your Friends on Social Media Disclose Your Emotions? · AAAI 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image emotion analysis
0.112014
How Do Your Friends on Social Media Disclose Your Emotions? · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

joint modeling · 0.4f1-score evaluation · 0.4gibbs sampling · 0.2generative model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 RAIN: Social Role-Aware Information Diffusion
abstract
Information diffusion, which studies how information is propagated in social networks, has attracted considerable research effort recently. However, most existing approaches do not distinguish social roles that nodes may play in the diffusion process. In this paper, we study the interplay between users' social roles and their influence on information diffusion. We propose a Role-Aware INformation diffusion model (RAIN) that integrates social role recognition and diffusion modeling into a unified framework. We develop a Gibbs-sampling based algorithm to learn the proposed model using historical diffusion data. The proposed model can be applied to different scenarios. For instance, at the micro-level, the proposed model can be used to predict whether an individual user will repost a specific message; while at the macro-level, we can use the model to predict the scale and the duration of a diffusion process. We evaluate the proposed model on a real social media data set. Our model performs much better in both micro- and macro-level prediction than several alternative methods.
Yang Yang 0009, Jie Tang 0001, Cane Wing-ki Leung, Yizhou Sun, Qicong Chen, Juan-Zi Li, Qiang Yang 0001
AAAI5
2014 How Do Your Friends on Social Media Disclose Your Emotions?
abstract
Extracting emotions from images has attracted much interest, in particular with the rapid development of social networks. The emotional impact is very important for understanding the intrinsic meanings of images. Despite many studies having been done, most existing methods focus on image content, but ignore the emotion of the user who published the image. One interesting question is: How does social effect correlate with the emotion expressed in an image? Specifically, can we leverage friends interactions (e.g., discussions) related to an image to help extract the emotions? In this paper, we formally formalize the problem and propose a novel emotion learning method by jointly modeling images posted by social users and comments added by their friends. One advantage of the model is that it can distinguish those comments that are closely related to the emotion expression for an image from the other irrelevant ones. Experiments on an open Flickr dataset show that the proposed model can significantly improve (+37.4% by F1) the accuracy for inferring user emotions. More interestingly, we found that half of the improvements are due to interactions between 1.0% of the closest friends.
Yang Yang 0009, Jia Jia 0001, Shumei Zhang, Boya Wu, Qicong Chen, Juan-Zi Li, Chunxiao Xing, Jie Tang 0001
AAAI5