Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tina Woolf

dblp:149/2515 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 33% Approximation and online algorithms · 17%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
binary classification
0.312018
Simple Classification Using Binary Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery
low-rank matrix recovery
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
randomized greedy algorithm
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.312017
Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-dimensional projection · 0.3stochastic gradient descent · 0.3greedy algorithm · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Simple Classification Using Binary Data
abstract
Binary, or one-bit, representations of data arise naturally in many applications, and are appealing in both hardware implementations and algorithm design. In this work, we study the problem of data classification from binary data obtained from the sign pattern of low-dimensional projections and propose a framework with low computation and resource costs. We illustrate the utility of the proposed approach through stylized and realistic numerical experiments, and provide a theoretical analysis for a simple case. We hope that our framework and analysis will serve as a foundation for studying similar types of approaches.
Deanna Needell, Rayan Saab, Tina Woolf
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2017 Linear Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Greedy Algorithms With Sparse Constraints
abstract
Motivated by recent work on stochastic gradient descent methods, we develop two stochastic variants of greedy algorithms for possibly non-convex optimization problems with sparsity constraints. We prove linear convergence1in expectation to the solution within a specified tolerance. This generalized framework is specialized to the problems of sparse signal recovery in compressed sensing and low-rank matrix recovery, giving methods with provable convergence guarantees that often outperform their deterministic counterparts. We also analyze the settings, where gradients and projections can only be computed approximately, and prove the methods are robust to these approximations. We include many numerical experiments, which align with the theoretical analysis and demonstrate these improvements in several different settings.
Deanna Needell, Tina Woolf
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3