EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Junghanns
dblp:149/5877
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Graph data management · 67% Data mining · 16% Data integration and cleaning · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph data management
distributed graph processing |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Distributed temporal graph analytics with GRADOOP · VLDB J. 2022 Declarative and distributed graph analytics with GRADOOP · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Graph data management
temporal graph mining |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed temporal graph analytics with GRADOOP · VLDB J. 2022 |
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Declarative and distributed graph analytics with GRADOOP · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Graph data management
graph pattern matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Declarative and distributed graph analytics with GRADOOP · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Graph data management
graph query |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Declarative and distributed graph analytics with GRADOOP · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Data mining
business intelligence |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Graph-based Data Integration and Business Intelligence with BIIIG · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014 |
Data integration and cleaning
graph-based data integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Graph-based Data Integration and Business Intelligence with BIIIG · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014 |
Data models and query languages
graph query language |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed temporal graph analytics with GRADOOP · VLDB J. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
declarative query language · 0.6dataflow processing · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Distributed temporal graph analytics with GRADOOPabstractAbstract Temporal property graphs are graphs whose structure and properties change over time. Temporal graph datasets tend to be large due to stored historical information, asking for scalable analysis capabilities. We give a complete overview of Gradoop, a graph dataflow system for scalable, distributed analytics of temporal property graphs which has been continuously developed since 2005. Its graph model TPGM allows bitemporal modeling not only of vertices and edges but also of graph collections. A declarative analytical language called GrALa allows analysts to flexibly define analytical graph workflows by composing different operators that support temporal graph analysis. Built on a distributed dataflow system, large temporal graphs can be processed on a shared-nothing cluster. We present the system architecture of Gradoop, its data model TPGM with composable temporal graph operators, like snapshot, difference, pattern matching, graph grouping and several implementation details. We evaluate the performance and scalability of selected operators and a composed workflow for synthetic and real-world temporal graphs with up to 283 M vertices and 1.8 B edges, and a graph lifetime of about 8 years with up to 20 M new edges per year. We also reflect on lessons learned from the Gradoop effort. Christopher Rost, Kevin Gómez, Matthias Täschner, Philip Fritzsche, Lucas Schons, Lukas Christ, Timo Adameit, Martin Junghanns, Erhard Rahm |
VLDB J. | 8 |
| 2018 | openCypher: New Directions in Property Graph Querying
Alastair Green, Martin Junghanns, Max Kießling, Tobias Lindaaker, Stefan Plantikow, Petra Selmer |
EDBT | 2 |
| 2018 | Declarative and distributed graph analytics with GRADOOPabstractWe demonstrate G radoop , an open source framework that combines and extends features of graph database systems with the benefits of distributed graph processing. Using a rich graph data model and powerful graph operators, users can declaratively express graph analytical programs for distributed execution without needing advanced programming experience or a deeper understanding of the underlying system. Visitors of the demo can declare graph analytical programs using the G radoop operators and also visually experience two of our advanced operators: graph pattern matching and graph grouping. We provide real world and artificial social network data with up to 10 billion edges and allow running the programs either locally or on a remote research cluster to demonstrate scalability. Martin Junghanns, Max Kießling, Niklas Teichmann, Kevin Gómez, André Petermann, Erhard Rahm |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2017 | DIMSpan: Transactional Frequent Subgraph Mining with Distributed In-Memory Dataflow SystemsabstractTransactional frequent subgraph mining identifies frequent structural patterns in a collection of graphs. This research problem has wide applicability and increasingly requires higher scalability over single machine solutions to address the needs of Big Data use cases. We introduce DIMSpan, an advanced approach to frequent subgraph mining that utilizes the features provided by distributed in-memory dataflow systems such as Apache Flink or Apache Spark. It determines the complete set of frequent subgraphs from arbitrary string-labeled directed multigraphs as they occur in social, business and knowledge networks. DIMSpan is optimized to runtime and minimal network traffic but memory-aware. An extensive performance evaluation on large graph collections shows the scalability of DIMSpan and the effectiveness of its optimization techniques. André Petermann, Martin Junghanns, Erhard Rahm |
BDCAT | 2 |
| 2014 | Graph-based Data Integration and Business Intelligence with BIIIGabstractWe demonstrate BIIIG (Business Intelligence with Integrated Instance Graphs), a new system for graph-based data integration and analysis. It aims at improving business analytics compared to traditional OLAP approaches by comprehensively tracking relationships between entities and making them available for analysis. BIIIG supports a largely automatic data integration pipeline for metadata and instance data. Metadata from heterogeneous sources are integrated in a so-called Unified Metadata Graph (UMG) while instance data is combined in a single integrated instance graph (IIG). A unique feature of BIIIG is the concept of business transaction graphs, which are derived from the IIG and which reflect all steps involved in a specific business process. Queries and analysis tasks can refer to the entire instance graph or sets of business transaction graphs. In the demonstration, we perform all data integration steps and present analytic queries including pattern matching and graph-based aggregation of business measures. André Petermann, Martin Junghanns, Robert Müller 0001, Erhard Rahm |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |