Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mathew Ryden
dblp:149/7598 · also Matthew Ryden
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 62% Distributed systems · 38% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive Computing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive Computing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive Computing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Distributed systems › replication › replication and fault tolerance
replication and recovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive Computing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mapreduce · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive ComputingabstractCentralized cloud infrastructures have become the popular platforms for data-intensive computing today. However, they suffer from inefficient data mobility due to the centralization of cloud resources, and hence, are highly unsuited for geo-distributed data-intensive applications where the data may be spread at multiple geographical locations. In this paper, we present Nebula: a dispersed edge cloud infrastructure that explores the use of voluntary resources for both computation and data storage. We describe the lightweight Nebula architecture that enables distributed data-intensive computing through a number of optimization techniques including location-aware data and computation placement, replication, and recovery. We evaluate Nebula performance on an emulated volunteer platform that spans over 50 PlanetLab nodes distributed across Europe, and show how a common data-intensive computing framework, MapReduce, can be easily deployed and run on Nebula. We show Nebula MapReduce is robust to a wide array of failures and substantially outperforms other wide-area versions based on emulated existing systems. Albert Jonathan, Mathew Ryden, Kwangsung Oh, Abhishek Chandra, Jon B. Weissman |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 2 |
| 2014 | Nebula: Distributed Edge Cloud for Data Intensive ComputingabstractCentralized cloud infrastructures have become the de-facto platform for data-intensive computing today. However, they suffer from inefficient data mobility due to the centralization of cloud resources, and hence, are highly unsuited for dispersed-data-intensive applications, where the data may be spread at multiple geographical locations. In this paper, we present Nebula: a dispersed cloud infrastructure that uses voluntary edge resources for both computation and data storage. We describe the lightweight Nebula architecture that enables distributed data-intensive computing through a number of optimizations including location-aware data and computation placement, replication, and recovery. We evaluate Nebula's performance on an emulated volunteer platform that spans over 50 PlanetLab nodes distributed across Europe, and show how a common data-intensive computing framework, MapReduce, can be easily deployed and run on Nebula. We show Nebula MapReduce is robust to a wide array of failures and substantially outperforms other wide-area versions based on a BOINC like model. Mathew Ryden, Kwangsung Oh, Abhishek Chandra, Jon B. Weissman |
IC2E | 1 |