Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Katherine E. Niehaus

dblp:149/9584 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 55% Medical and health informatics · 46%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › microbiology
antimicrobial resistance
0.312018
Machine learning for classifying tuberculosis drug-resistance from DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data analysis
DNA sequencing analysis
0.312018
Machine learning for classifying tuberculosis drug-resistance from DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.312018
Machine learning for classifying tuberculosis drug-resistance from DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2018
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics
clinical data management
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics › clinical monitoring › patient monitoring
intensive care monitoring
0.212016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine
0.112016
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care · Proc. IEEE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.6classification · 0.3data preprocessing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Machine learning for classifying tuberculosis drug-resistance from DNA sequencing data
abstract
Motivation: Correct and rapid determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) resistance against available tuberculosis (TB) drugs is essential for the control and management of TB. Conventional molecular diagnostic test assumes that the presence of any well-studied single nucleotide polymorphisms is sufficient to cause resistance, which yields low sensitivity for resistance classification. Summary: Given the availability of DNA sequencing data from MTB, we developed machine learning models for a cohort of 1839 UK bacterial isolates to classify MTB resistance against eight anti-TB drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, streptomycin) and to classify multi-drug resistance. Results: Compared to previous rules-based approach, the sensitivities from the best-performing models increased by 2-4% for isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol to 97% (P < 0.01), respectively; for ciprofloxacin and multi-drug resistant TB, they increased to 96%. For moxifloxacin and ofloxacin, sensitivities increased by 12 and 15% from 83 and 81% based on existing known resistance alleles to 95% and 96% (P < 0.01), respectively. Particularly, our models improved sensitivities compared to the previous rules-based approach by 15 and 24% to 84 and 87% for pyrazinamide and streptomycin (P < 0.01), respectively. The best-performing models increase the area-under-the-ROC curve by 10% for pyrazinamide and streptomycin (P < 0.01), and 4-8% for other drugs (P < 0.01). Availability and implementation: The details of source code are provided at http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~davidc/code.php. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Yang Yang 0125, Katherine E. Niehaus, Timothy M. Walker, Zamin Iqbal, A. Sarah Walker, Daniel J. Wilson 0001, Tim E. A. Peto, Derrick W. Crook, E. Grace Smith, Tingting Zhu 0001, David A. Clifton
Bioinform.2
2016 Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care
abstract
Clinical data management systems typically provide caregiver teams with useful information, derived from large, sometimes highly heterogeneous, data sources that are often changing dynamically. Over the last decade there has been a significant surge in interest in using these data sources, from simply re-using the standard clinical databases for event prediction or decision support, to including dynamic and patient-specific information into clinical monitoring and prediction problems. However, in most cases, commercial clinical databases have been designed to document clinical activity for reporting, liability and billing reasons, rather than for developing new algorithms. With increasing excitement surrounding "secondary use of medical records" and "Big Data" analytics, it is important to understand the limitations of current databases and what needs to change in order to enter an era of "precision medicine." This review article covers many of the issues involved in the collection and preprocessing of critical care data. The three challenges in critical care are considered: compartmentalization, corruption, and complexity. A range of applications addressing these issues are covered, including the modernization of static acuity scoring; on-line patient tracking; personalized prediction and risk assessment; artifact detection; state estimation; and incorporation of multimodal data sources such as genomic and free text data.
Alistair E. W. Johnson, Mohammad M. Ghassemi, Shamim Nemati, Katherine E. Niehaus, David A. Clifton, Gari D. Clifford
Proc. IEEE4