Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander J. Weir

dblp:149/9751 · also Alexander Weir · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2800-9053ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
privacy attacks on machine learning models
0.712023
Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The role of noise in denoising models for anomaly detection in medical images
Antanas Kascenas, Pedro Sanchez, Patrick Schrempf, William Clackett, Shadia Mikhael, Jeremy Voisey, Keith A. Goatman, Alexander J. Weir, Nicolas Pugeault, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Alison O'Neil
Medical Image Anal.9
2023 Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time
abstract
Leakage of data from publicly available Machine Learning (ML) models is an area of growing significance since commercial and government applications of ML can draw on multiple sources of data, potentially including users' and clients' sensitive data. We provide a comprehensive survey of contemporary advances on several fronts, covering involuntary data leakage which is natural to ML models, potential malicious leakage which is caused by privacy attacks, and currently available defence mechanisms. We focus on inference-time leakage, as the most likely scenario for publicly available models. We first discuss what leakage is in the context of different data, tasks, and model architectures. We then propose a taxonomy across involuntary and malicious leakage, followed by description of currently available defences, assessment metrics, and applications. We conclude with outstanding challenges and open questions, outlining some promising directions for future research.
Marija Jegorova, Chaitanya Kaul, Charlie Mayor, Alison O'Neil, Alexander J. Weir, Roderick Murray-Smith, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.5