Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander J. Weir
dblp:149/9751 · also Alexander Weir
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2800-9053ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
privacy attacks on machine learning models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The role of noise in denoising models for anomaly detection in medical images
Antanas Kascenas, Pedro Sanchez, Patrick Schrempf, William Clackett, Shadia Mikhael, Jeremy Voisey, Keith A. Goatman, Alexander J. Weir, Nicolas Pugeault, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Alison O'Neil |
Medical Image Anal. | 9 |
| 2023 | Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference TimeabstractLeakage of data from publicly available Machine Learning (ML) models is an area of growing significance since commercial and government applications of ML can draw on multiple sources of data, potentially including users' and clients' sensitive data. We provide a comprehensive survey of contemporary advances on several fronts, covering involuntary data leakage which is natural to ML models, potential malicious leakage which is caused by privacy attacks, and currently available defence mechanisms. We focus on inference-time leakage, as the most likely scenario for publicly available models. We first discuss what leakage is in the context of different data, tasks, and model architectures. We then propose a taxonomy across involuntary and malicious leakage, followed by description of currently available defences, assessment metrics, and applications. We conclude with outstanding challenges and open questions, outlining some promising directions for future research. Marija Jegorova, Chaitanya Kaul, Charlie Mayor, Alison O'Neil, Alexander J. Weir, Roderick Murray-Smith, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 5 |