Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur J. Friend
dblp:15/11343
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 50% Wireless networking · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › network deployment
node placement |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Distributed node placement algorithms for constructing well-connected sensor networks · INFOCOM 2012 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Distributed node placement algorithms for constructing well-connected sensor networks · INFOCOM 2012 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Distributed node placement algorithms for constructing well-connected sensor networks · INFOCOM 2012 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Distributed node placement algorithms for constructing well-connected sensor networks · INFOCOM 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral graph theory · 0.3proximal minorant methods · 0.3alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Distributed node placement algorithms for constructing well-connected sensor networksabstractWe study the problem of node placement in a sensor network. We consider proximity-based communication models where each sensor can only communicate with the ones within a given distance from it and the quality of communication between two sensors decreases with their distance. Each sensor can move locally and our goal is to improve the network connectivity by locally relocating the sensors. We use tools from spectral graph theory to determine the criticality of each edge to the global network connectivity. Based on the criticality measure, we develop algorithms that iteratively move the sensors in directions that improve the communication along more critical edges. Our algorithms are fully decentralized and only use local information exchange which are essential features for the sensor network application due to lack of centralized control and access to information in such networks. We formulate our problem as a convex optimization and use techniques from proximal minorant methods to prove the convergence of our iterative algorithms. Further, to make the algorithms fully local we use ideas such as the alternating direction method of multipliers from the distributed optimization literature. We also quantitatively illustrate the effectiveness of our schemes using simulation on a few sample networks. Arthur J. Friend, Vahideh H. Manshadi, Amin Saberi |
INFOCOM | 1 |