EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ananda Basu
dblp:15/1256
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 5 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 77% Automated reasoning and model checking · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms › distributed coordination
distributed scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking · CAV 2009 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking · CAV 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model checking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Statistical abstraction and model-checking of large heterogeneous systems
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Marius Bozga, Benoît Delahaye, Axel Legay |
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. | 1 |
| 2011 | Rigorous system level modeling and analysis of mixed HW/SW systemsabstractA grand challenge in complex embedded systems design is developing methods and tools for modeling and analyzing the behavior of an application software running on multicore or distributed platforms. We propose a rigorous method and a tool chain that allows to obtain a faithful model representing the behavior of a mixed hardware/software system from a model of its application software and a model of its underlying hardware architecture. The system model can be simulated and analyzed for validation of both functional and extra-functional properties. The tool chain uses DOL (Distributed Operation Layer [1]) as the frontend for specifying the application software and hardware architecture, and BIP (Behavior Interaction Priority [2]) as the modeling and analysis framework. It is illustrated through the construction of system models of MJPEG and MPEG2 decoder applications running on MPARM, a multicore architecture. Paraskevas Bourgos, Ananda Basu, Marius Bozga, Saddek Bensalem, Joseph Sifakis |
MEMOCODE | 2 |
| 2011 | Priority scheduling of distributed systems based on model checking
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Doron A. Peled, Joseph Sifakis |
Formal Methods Syst. Des. | 1 |
| 2010 | Verification of an AFDX Infrastructure Using Simulations and Probabilities
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Marius Bozga, Benoît Delahaye, Axel Legay, Emmanuel Sifakis |
RV | 1 |
| 2010 | Systematic Correct Construction of Self-stabilizing Systems: A Case Study
Ananda Basu, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis |
SSS | 1 |
| 2009 | Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Doron A. Peled, Joseph Sifakis |
CAV | 1 |
| 2009 | Brief Announcement: Incremental Component-Based Modeling, Verification, and Performance Evaluation of Distributed Reset
Ananda Basu, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis |
DISC | 1 |
| 2008 | Incremental Component-Based Construction and Verification of a Robotic SystemabstractAutonomous robots are complex systems that require the interaction/cooperation of numerous heterogeneous software components. Nowadays, robots are critical systems and must meet safety properties including in particular temporal and real-time constraints. We present a methodology for modeling and analyzing a robotic system using the BIP component framework integrated with an existing framework and architecture, the LAAS Architecture for Autonomous System, based on Geno Ananda Basu, Matthieu Gallien, Charles Lesire, Thanh-Hung Nguyen, Saddek Bensalem, Félix Ingrand, Joseph Sifakis |
ECAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Distributed Semantics and Implementation for Systems with Interaction and Priority
Ananda Basu, Philippe Bidinger, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis |
FORTE | 1 |
| 2007 | Using BIP for Modeling and Verification of Networked Systems -- A Case Study on TinyOS-based NetworksabstractWe apply a model construction methodology to TinyOS- based networks, using the behavior-interaction-priority (BIP) component framework. The methodology consists in building the model of a node as the composition of a model extracted from a nesC program describing the application, and models of TinyOS components. Models for networks are obtained by composition of models for nodes by using BIP connectors implementing different types of radio chan- nels. This opens the way for enhanced analysis and early error detection by using verification techniques. Ananda Basu, Laurent Mounier, Marc Poulhiès, Jacques Pulou, Joseph Sifakis |
NCA | 1 |
| 2006 | Modeling Heterogeneous Real-time Components in BIPabstractWe present a methodology for modeling heterogeneous real-time components. Components are obtained as the superposition of three layers: behavior, specified as a set of transitions; Interactions between transitions of the behavior; Priorities, used to choose amongst possible interactions. A parameterized binary composition operator is used to compose components layer by layer. We present the BIP language for the description and composition of layered components as well as associated tools for executing and analyzing components on a dedicated platform. The language provides a powerful mechanism for structuring interactions involving rendezvous and broadcast. We show that synchronous and timed systems are particular classes of components. Finally, we provide examples and compare the BIP framework to existing ones for heterogeneous component-based modeling Ananda Basu, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis |
SEFM | 1 |