Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ananda Basu

dblp:15/1256 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 5 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 77% Automated reasoning and model checking · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms › distributed coordination
distributed scheduling
0.112009
Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking · CAV 2009
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.012009
Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking · CAV 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model checking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Statistical abstraction and model-checking of large heterogeneous systems
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Marius Bozga, Benoît Delahaye, Axel Legay
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.1
2011 Rigorous system level modeling and analysis of mixed HW/SW systems
abstract
A grand challenge in complex embedded systems design is developing methods and tools for modeling and analyzing the behavior of an application software running on multicore or distributed platforms. We propose a rigorous method and a tool chain that allows to obtain a faithful model representing the behavior of a mixed hardware/software system from a model of its application software and a model of its underlying hardware architecture. The system model can be simulated and analyzed for validation of both functional and extra-functional properties. The tool chain uses DOL (Distributed Operation Layer [1]) as the frontend for specifying the application software and hardware architecture, and BIP (Behavior Interaction Priority [2]) as the modeling and analysis framework. It is illustrated through the construction of system models of MJPEG and MPEG2 decoder applications running on MPARM, a multicore architecture.
Paraskevas Bourgos, Ananda Basu, Marius Bozga, Saddek Bensalem, Joseph Sifakis
MEMOCODE2
2011 Priority scheduling of distributed systems based on model checking
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Doron A. Peled, Joseph Sifakis
Formal Methods Syst. Des.1
2010 Verification of an AFDX Infrastructure Using Simulations and Probabilities
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Marius Bozga, Benoît Delahaye, Axel Legay, Emmanuel Sifakis
RV1
2010 Systematic Correct Construction of Self-stabilizing Systems: A Case Study
Ananda Basu, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
SSS1
2009 Priority Scheduling of Distributed Systems Based on Model Checking
Ananda Basu, Saddek Bensalem, Doron A. Peled, Joseph Sifakis
CAV1
2009 Brief Announcement: Incremental Component-Based Modeling, Verification, and Performance Evaluation of Distributed Reset
Ananda Basu, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
DISC1
2008 Incremental Component-Based Construction and Verification of a Robotic System
abstract
Autonomous robots are complex systems that require the interaction/cooperation of numerous heterogeneous software components. Nowadays, robots are critical systems and must meet safety properties including in particular temporal and real-time constraints. We present a methodology for modeling and analyzing a robotic system using the BIP component framework integrated with an existing framework and architecture, the LAAS Architecture for Autonomous System, based on Geno
Ananda Basu, Matthieu Gallien, Charles Lesire, Thanh-Hung Nguyen, Saddek Bensalem, Félix Ingrand, Joseph Sifakis
ECAI1
2008 Distributed Semantics and Implementation for Systems with Interaction and Priority
Ananda Basu, Philippe Bidinger, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
FORTE1
2007 Using BIP for Modeling and Verification of Networked Systems -- A Case Study on TinyOS-based Networks
abstract
We apply a model construction methodology to TinyOS- based networks, using the behavior-interaction-priority (BIP) component framework. The methodology consists in building the model of a node as the composition of a model extracted from a nesC program describing the application, and models of TinyOS components. Models for networks are obtained by composition of models for nodes by using BIP connectors implementing different types of radio chan- nels. This opens the way for enhanced analysis and early error detection by using verification techniques.
Ananda Basu, Laurent Mounier, Marc Poulhiès, Jacques Pulou, Joseph Sifakis
NCA1
2006 Modeling Heterogeneous Real-time Components in BIP
abstract
We present a methodology for modeling heterogeneous real-time components. Components are obtained as the superposition of three layers: behavior, specified as a set of transitions; Interactions between transitions of the behavior; Priorities, used to choose amongst possible interactions. A parameterized binary composition operator is used to compose components layer by layer. We present the BIP language for the description and composition of layered components as well as associated tools for executing and analyzing components on a dedicated platform. The language provides a powerful mechanism for structuring interactions involving rendezvous and broadcast. We show that synchronous and timed systems are particular classes of components. Finally, we provide examples and compare the BIP framework to existing ones for heterogeneous component-based modeling
Ananda Basu, Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
SEFM1