Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

C. Brandan S. Traw

dblp:15/1418 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › protocol implementation
protocol processing
0.011993
Hardware/Software Organization of a High-Performance ATM Host Interface · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1993
Internet architecture and protocols › network i/o › network interface architecture
high-speed network interface
0.011991
A High-Performance Host Interface for ATM Networks · SIGCOMM 1991
Internet architecture and protocols
ATM networks
0.011991
A High-Performance Host Interface for ATM Networks · SIGCOMM 1991
Internet architecture and protocols › packet processing
segmentation and reassembly
0.011991
A High-Performance Host Interface for ATM Networks · SIGCOMM 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardware-software co-design · 0.0experimental evaluation · 0.0parallel architecture · 0.0hardware protocol processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Hardware/Software Organization of a High-Performance ATM Host Interface
abstract
A successful hardware/software architecture that resolves performance bottlenecks at the workstation-to-network host interface and offers high end-to-end performance is described. The solution reported carefully splits protocol processing functions into hardware and software implementations. The interface hardware is highly parallel and performs all per-cell functions with dedicated logic to maximize performance. Software provides support for the transfer of data between the interface and application memory, as well as the state management necessary for virtual circuit setup and maintenance. In addition, all higher-level protocol processing is implemented with host software. The prototype connects a RISC System/6000 to a SONET-based asynchronous transfer model (ATM) network carrying data at the OC-3c rate of 155 Mb/s. An experimental evaluation of the interface hardware and software has been performed. Several conclusions are drawn about this host interface architecture and the workstations to which it is connected.>
C. Brandan S. Traw, Jonathan M. Smith
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1
1991 A High-Performance Host Interface for ATM Networks
abstract
The advent of high speed networks has increased demands on processor architectures.These architectural demands are due to the increase in network bandwidth relative to the speeds of processor components.One impottant component for a balanced system is the workstation-to-network ho,u inlerjface.Our solution migrates a carefully selected set of protocol processing functions into hardware.It connects an IBM RS/6000 workstation to a Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) STS-3c~line carrying fmedsize Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) cells.The host interface described in this paper is highly parallel and a pure hardware solution to maximize performance.The~is a clean separation between the interface functions, such as segmentation and reassembly, and the interfacelhost communication.This separation eases porting the interface to other workstation plafforms.We intend to use this interface (and its successors) as a component of the AURORA gigabit per second (Gbps) testbed.
C. Brandan S. Traw, Jonathan M. Smith
SIGCOMM1