Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yudong Chen 0003

dblp:15/1975-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6591-0019ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning paradigms · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 40% Reinforcement learning · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 92% Data mining · 8%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.612022
A Survey on Curriculum Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › curriculum learning
self-paced learning
0.612022
A Survey on Curriculum Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
curriculum meta-learning
0.512021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.512021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021
Recommender systems › user interest modeling
disentangled recommendation
0.512021
Curriculum Disentangled Recommendation with Noisy Multi-feedback · NeurIPS 2021
Recommender systems › point-of-interest recommendation
next POI recommendation
0.512021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021
Recommender systems
point-of-interest recommendation
0.512021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.112021
Curriculum Disentangled Recommendation with Noisy Multi-feedback · NeurIPS 2021
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation
0.112021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021
Data mining › spatiotemporal data mining
cross-city transfer
0.112021
Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

curriculum learning · 2.0meta-learning · 1.0hard sample mining · 1.0dynamic routing · 1.0co-filtering · 1.0training scheduler · 0.6difficulty measurer · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Survey on Curriculum Learning
abstract
Curriculum learning (CL) is a training strategy that trains a machine learning model from easier data to harder data, which imitates the meaningful learning order in human curricula. As an easy-to-use plug-in, the CL strategy has demonstrated its power in improving the generalization capacity and convergence rate of various models in a wide range of scenarios such as computer vision and natural language processing etc. In this survey article, we comprehensively review CL from various aspects including motivations, definitions, theories, and applications. We discuss works on curriculum learning within a general CL framework, elaborating on how to design a manually predefined curriculum or an automatic curriculum. In particular, we summarize existing CL designs based on the general framework of Difficulty Measurer + Training Scheduler and further categorize the methodologies for automatic CL into four groups, i.e., Self-paced Learning, Transfer Teacher, RL Teacher, and Other Automatic CL. We also analyze principles to select different CL designs that may benefit practical applications. Finally, we present our insights on the relationships connecting CL and other machine learning concepts including transfer learning, meta-learning, continual learning and active learning, etc., then point out challenges in CL as well as potential future research directions deserving further investigations.
Xin Wang 0019, Yudong Chen 0003, Wenwu Zhu 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2021 Curriculum Meta-Learning for Next POI Recommendation
abstract
Next point-of-interest (POI) recommendation is a hot research field where a recent emerging scenario, next POI to search recommendation, has been deployed in many online map services such as Baidu Maps. One of the key issues in this scenario is providing satisfactory recommendation services for cold-start cities with a limited number of user-POI interactions, which requires transferring the knowledge hidden in rich data from many other cities to these cold-start cities. Existing literature either does not consider the city-transfer issue or cannot simultaneously tackle the data sparsity and pattern diversity issues among various users in multiple cities. To address these issues, we explore city-transfer next POI to search recommendation that transfers the knowledge from multiple cities with rich data to cold-start cities with scarce data. We propose a novel Curriculum Hardness Aware Meta-Learning (CHAML) framework, which incorporates hard sample mining and curriculum learning into a meta-learning paradigm. Concretely, the CHAML framework considers both city-level and user-level hardness to enhance the conditional sampling during meta training, and uses an easy-to-hard curriculum for the city-sampling pool to help the meta-learner converge to a better state. Extensive experiments on two real-world map search datasets from Baidu Maps demonstrate the superiority of CHAML framework.
Yudong Chen 0003, Xin Wang 0019, Jizhou Huang, Shengwen Yang, Wenwu Zhu 0001
KDD1
2021 Curriculum Disentangled Recommendation with Noisy Multi-feedback
abstract
Learning disentangled representations for user intentions from multi-feedback (i.e., positive and negative feedback) can enhance the accuracy and explainability of recommendation algorithms. However, learning such disentangled representations from multi-feedback data is challenging because i) multi-feedback is complex: there exist complex relations among different types of feedback (e.g., click, unclick, and dislike, etc) as well as various user intentions, and ii) multi-feedback is noisy: there exists noisy (useless) information both in features and labels, which may deteriorate the recommendation performance. Existing works on disentangled representation learning only focus on positive feedback, failing to handle the complex relations and noise hidden in multi-feedback data. To solve this problem, in this work we propose a Curriculum Disentangled Recommendation (CDR) model that is capable of efficiently learning disentangled representations from complex and noisy multi-feedback for better recommendation. Concretely, we design a co-filtering dynamic routing mechanism that simultaneously captures the complex relations among different behavioral feedback and user intentions as well as denoise the representations in the feature level. We then present an adjustable self-evaluating curriculum that is able to evaluate sample difficulties for better model training and conduct denoising in the label level via disregarding useless information. Our extensive experiments on several real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed CDR model can significantly outperform several state-of-the-art methods in terms of recommendation accuracy.
Hong Chen 0011, Yudong Chen 0003, Xin Wang 0019, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang 0068, Feng Xia 0006, Wenwu Zhu 0001
NeurIPS2