Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hung-Leng Chen

dblp:15/2231 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 82% Machine learning and data management · 18%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › clustering
categorical data clustering
0.232009
Catching the Trend: A Framework for Clustering Concept-Drifting Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
On Data Labeling for Clustering Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008
Labeling Unclustered Categorical Data into Clusters Based on the Important Attribute Values · ICDM 2005
Data mining
clustering
0.232009
Catching the Trend: A Framework for Clustering Concept-Drifting Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
On Data Labeling for Clustering Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008
Labeling Unclustered Categorical Data into Clusters Based on the Important Attribute Values · ICDM 2005
Machine learning and data management
data annotation
0.122009
On Data Labeling for Clustering Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008
Catching the Trend: A Framework for Clustering Concept-Drifting Categorical Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
Data mining › clustering › interpretable clustering
cluster labeling
0.112005
Labeling Unclustered Categorical Data into Clusters Based on the Important Attribute Values · ICDM 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximal resemblance data labeling · 0.2sampling · 0.2node importance representative · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Feature-preserved sampling over streaming data
abstract
In this article, we explore a novel sampling model, calledfeature preserved sampling(FPS) that sequentially generates a high-quality sample over sliding windows. The sampling quality we consider refers to the degree of consistency between the sample proportion and the population proportion of each attribute value in a window. Due to the time-variant nature of real-world datasets, users are more likely to be interested in the most recent data. However, previous works have not been able to generate a high-quality sample over sliding windows that precisely preserves up-to-date population characteristics. Motivated by this shortcoming, we have developed theFPSalgorithm, which has several advantages: (1) it sequentially generates a sample from a time-variant data source over sliding windows; (2) the execution time ofFPSis linear with respect to the database size; (3) therelativeproportional differences between the sample proportions and population proportions of most distinct attribute values are guaranteed to be below a specified error threshold, ε, while therelativeproportion differences of the remaining attribute values are as close to ε as possible, which ensures that the generated sample is of high quality; (4) the sample rate is close to the user specified rate so that a high quality sampling result can be obtained without increasing the sample size; (5) by a thorough analytical and empirical study, we prove thatFPShas acceptable space overheads, especially when the attribute values have Zipfian distributions, andFPScan also excellently preserve the population proportion of multivariate features in the sample; and (6)FPScan be applied to infinite streams and finite datasets equally, and the generated samples can be used for various applications. Our experiments on both real and synthetic data validate thatFPScan effectively obtain a high quality sample of the desired size. In addition, while using the sample generated byFPSin various mining applications, a significant improvement in efficiency can be achieved without compromising the model's precision.
Kun-Ta Chuang, Hung-Leng Chen, Ming-Syan Chen
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data2
2009 Catching the Trend: A Framework for Clustering Concept-Drifting Categorical Data
abstract
Sampling has been recognized as an important technique to improve the efficiency of clustering. However, with sampling applied, those points that are not sampled will not have their labels after the normal process. Although there is a straightforward approach in the numerical domain, the problem of how to allocate those unlabeled data points into proper clusters remains as a challenging issue in the categorical domain. In this paper, a mechanism named MAximal Resemblance Data Labeling (abbreviated as MARDL) is proposed to allocate each unlabeled data point into the corresponding appropriate cluster based on the novel categorical clustering representative, namely, N-Nodeset Importance Representative (abbreviated as NNIR), which represents clusters by the importance of the combinations of attribute values. MARDL has two advantages: (1) MARDL exhibits high execution efficiency, and (2) MARDL can achieve high intracluster similarity and low intercluster similarity, which are regarded as the most important properties of clusters, thus benefiting the analysis of cluster behaviors. MARDL is empirically validated on real and synthetic data sets and is shown to be significantly more efficient than prior works while attaining results of high quality.
Hung-Leng Chen, Ming-Syan Chen, Su-Chen Lin
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2008 On Data Labeling for Clustering Categorical Data
abstract
Sampling has been recognized as an important technique to improve the efficiency of clustering. However, with sampling applied, those points which are not sampled will not have their labels after the normal process. Although there is a straightforward approach in the numerical domain, the problem of how to allocate those unlabeled data points into proper clusters remains as a challenging issue in the categorical domain. In this paper, a mechanism named MAximal Resemblance Data Labeling (abbreviated as MARDL) is proposed to allocate each unlabeled data point into the corresponding appropriate cluster based on the novel categorical clustering representative, namely, N-Nodeset Importance Representative(abbreviated as NNIR), which represents clusters by the importance of the combinations of attribute values. MARDL has two advantages: (1) MARDL exhibits high execution efficiency; (2) MARDL can achieve high intra-cluster similarity and low inter-cluster similarity, which are regarded as the most important properties of clusters, thus benefiting the analysis of cluster behaviors. MARDL is empirically validated on real and synthetic data sets, and is shown to be not only more efficient than prior methods but also attaining results of better quality.
Hung-Leng Chen, Kun-Ta Chuang, Ming-Syan Chen
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2005 Labeling Unclustered Categorical Data into Clusters Based on the Important Attribute Values
abstract
Sampling has been recognized as an important technique to improve the efficiency of clustering. However, with sampling applied, those points which are not sampled will not have their labels. Although there is a straightforward approach in the numerical domain, the problem of how to allocate those unlabeled data points into proper clusters remains as a challenging issue in the categorical domain. In this paper, a mechanism named MAximal Resemblance Data Labeling (abbreviated as MARDL) is proposed to allocate each unlabeled data point into the corresponding appropriate cluster based on the novel categorical clustering representative, namely, Node Importance Representative (abbreviated as NIR), which represents clusters by the importance of attribute values. MARDL has two advantages: (1) MARDL exhibits high execution efficiency; (2) after each unlabeled data is allocated into the proper cluster, MARDL preserves clustering characteristics, i.e., high intra-cluster similarity and low inter-cluster similarity. MARDL is empirically validated via real and synthetic data sets, and is shown to be not only more efficient than prior methods but also attaining results of better quality.
Hung-Leng Chen, Kun-Ta Chuang, Ming-Syan Chen
ICDM1