Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clifford W. Mercer
dblp:15/228
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time operating systems |
0.0 | 3 | 1992 | Preemptibility in Real-Time Operating Systems · RTSS 1992 The ARTS Real-Time Object Model · RTSS 1990 Priority Inversions in Real-Time Communication · RTSS 1989 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
priority inversion |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Preemptibility in Real-Time Operating Systems · RTSS 1992 Priority Inversions in Real-Time Communication · RTSS 1989 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › resource sharing protocols
priority inheritance |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | The ARTS Real-Time Object Model · RTSS 1990 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time communication |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Priority Inversions in Real-Time Communication · RTSS 1989 |
Embedded and real-time systems
soft real-time systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Preemptibility in Real-Time Operating Systems · RTSS 1992 |
Embedded and real-time systems
distributed real-time systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Priority Inversions in Real-Time Communication · RTSS 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
analytical modeling · 0.0critical region implementation · 0.0schedulability analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Preemptibility in Real-Time Operating SystemsabstractReal-time operating systems generally depend on some form of priority information for making scheduling decisions. Priorities may take the form of small integers or deadline times, for example, and the priorities indicate the preferred order for execution of the jobs. Unfortunately, most systems suffer from some degree of priority inversion where a high priority job must wait for a lower priority job to execute. The authors consider the nature of the nonpreemptible code sections, called critical sections or critical regions, which give rise to this priority inversion in the context of a soft real-time operating system where average response time for different priority classes is the primary performance metric. An analytical model is described which is used to illustrate how critical regions may affect the time-constrained jobs in a multimedia (soft real-time) task set.> Clifford W. Mercer, Hideyuki Tokuda |
RTSS | 1 |
| 1991 | An evaluation of priority consistency in protocol architecturesabstractWorkstations for digital audio and video applications must support predictable processing, presentation, and transmission of continuous media data while making efficient use of limited hardware resources. The authors present techniques for managing network resources and processing messages in a predictable fashion. Their solutions use a novel structure for the protocol processing software, and they examine several alternatives and discuss the engineering tradeoffs associated with each. Using simulation, they evaluate their protocol processing structures and show that the more sophisticated structures can improve the response time and predictability of time-constrained messages. The ideas presented in this paper can be applied to resource management in the operating system and to the structuring of application-level servers. The designers of gateway machines (for internetwork routing) which handle both time-constrained traffic and non-time-constrained traffic may also benefit from this study.> Clifford W. Mercer, Hideyuki Tokuda |
LCN | 1 |
| 1991 | Priority Consistency in Protocol Architecture
Clifford W. Mercer, Hideyuki Tokuda |
NOSSDAV | 1 |
| 1990 | Distributed Hartstone: A Distributed Real-Time Benchmark SuiteabstractAn extension of the uniprocessor Hartstone benchmark for the distributed real-time environment, called the Distributed Hartstone benchmark, is described. The Distributed Hartstone measures system performance in the critical areas of communication latency and bandwidth, protocol preemptability, and priority queueing at the protocol and media access levels. Areas of the system which are particularly important for distributed, real-time computing are described. On the basis of the requirements that specify various areas of the system that a distributed real-time benchmark must stress, a series of task sets in the style of the Hartstone benchmarks are given. The benchmark results from a distributed real-time operating system (ARTS testbed) are given.> Clifford W. Mercer, Yutaka Ishikawa, Hideyuki Tokuda |
ICDCS | 1 |
| 1990 | The ARTS Real-Time Object ModelabstractThe authors present the motivation for using an object model for real-time operating systems, and describe the object model used in the ARTS kernel. A discussion is presented of the novel object classification and the priority inheritance properties which arise from this taxonomy. Various methods for implementing critical regions are described, and some guidelines as to the use of each are given.> Clifford W. Mercer, Hideyuki Tokuda |
RTSS | 1 |
| 1989 | Priority Inversions in Real-Time CommunicationabstractThe priority-inversion problems in real-time communication are addressed, and solutions developed for the ARTS distributed real-time operating system are presented. The performance results of the multi-thread-based protocol implementation are compared with those of other implementation schemes, and the schedulability is analyzed. Experimental results indicate that the multi-thread-based protocol implementation could eliminate potential priority-inversion problems and also demonstrate the same schedulability as the softint implementation scheme in spite of about 10% additional implementation overhead.> Hideyuki Tokuda, Clifford W. Mercer, Yutaka Ishikawa, Thomas E. Marchok |
RTSS | 2 |