Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oren Melamud
dblp:15/2488
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 first-authorTheory of computation · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 37% Information extraction and text analysis · 34% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 59% Computational geometry · 41% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › low-resource text classification
few-shot text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text Classification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text Classification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
unsupervised pre-training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text Classification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Simple Language Model based on PMI Matrix Approximations · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
word2vec |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Simple Language Model based on PMI Matrix Approximations · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Simple Language Model based on PMI Matrix Approximations · EMNLP 2017 |
Computational geometry › intersection graphs
interval graphs |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Dotted interval graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012 Dotted interval graphs and high throughput genotyping · SODA 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
inference rules |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Two Level Model for Context Sensitive Inference Rules · ACL (1) 2013 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph classes |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Dotted interval graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph coloring |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Dotted interval graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
annotator rationales |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text Classification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
rationale-based training |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text Classification · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genotyping |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Dotted interval graphs and high throughput genotyping · SODA 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised pre-training · 0.4annotator rationales · 0.4noise contrastive estimation · 0.3negative sampling · 0.3fixed-parameter tractability · 0.1approximation algorithm · 0.1graph algorithms · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Combining Unsupervised Pre-training and Annotator Rationales to Improve Low-shot Text ClassificationabstractOren Melamud, Mihaela Bornea, Ken Barker. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Oren Melamud, Mihaela A. Bornea, Ken Barker 0002 |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Self-Normalization Properties of Language ModelingabstractSelf-normalizing discriminative models approximate the normalized probability of a class without having to compute the partition function. In the context of language modeling, this property is particularly appealing as it may significantly reduce run-times due to large word vocabularies. In this study, we provide a comprehensive investigation of language modeling self-normalization. First, we theoretically analyze the inherent self-normalization properties of Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) language models. Then, we compare them empirically to softmax-based approaches, which are self-normalized using explicit regularization, and suggest a hybrid model with compelling properties. Finally, we uncover a surprising negative correlation between self-normalization and perplexity across the board, as well as some regularity in the observed errors, which may potentially be used for improving self-normalization algorithms in the future. Jacob Goldberger, Oren Melamud |
COLING | 2 |
| 2017 | A Simple Language Model based on PMI Matrix ApproximationsabstractIn this study, we introduce a new approach for learning language models by training them to estimate word-context pointwise mutual information (PMI), and then deriving the desired conditional probabilities from PMI at test time.Specifically, we show that with minor modifications to word2vec's algorithm, we get principled language models that are closely related to the well-established Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) based language models.A compelling aspect of our approach is that our models are trained with the same simple negative sampling objective function that is commonly used in word2vec to learn word embeddings. Oren Melamud, Ido Dagan, Jacob Goldberger |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2016 | context2vec: Learning Generic Context Embedding with Bidirectional LSTMabstractContext representations are central to various NLP tasks, such as word sense disambiguation, named entity recognition, coreference resolution, and many more.In this work we present a neural model for efficiently learning a generic context embedding function from large corpora, using bidirectional LSTM.With a very simple application of our context representations, we manage to surpass or nearly reach state-of-the-art results on sentence completion, lexical substitution and word sense disambiguation tasks, while substantially outperforming the popular context representation of averaged word embeddings.We release our code and pretrained models, suggesting they could be useful in a wide variety of NLP tasks. Oren Melamud, Jacob Goldberger, Ido Dagan |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2016 | The Negochat Corpus of Human-agent Negotiation Dialogues
Vasily Konovalov, Ron Artstein, Oren Melamud, Ido Dagan |
LREC | 3 |
| 2016 | The Role of Context Types and Dimensionality in Learning Word EmbeddingsabstractOren Melamud, David McClosky, Siddharth Patwardhan, Mohit Bansal. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. Oren Melamud, David McClosky, Siddharth Patwardhan, Mohit Bansal |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2015 | Modeling Word Meaning in Context with Substitute VectorsabstractContext representations are a key element in distributional models of word meaning. In contrast to typical representations based on neighboring words, a recently proposed ap-proach suggests to represent a context of a tar-get word by a substitute vector, comprising the potential fillers for the target word slot in that context. In this work we first propose a vari-ant of substitute vectors, which we find partic-ularly suitable for measuring context similar-ity. Then, we propose a novel model for rep-resenting word meaning in context based on this context representation. Our model outper-forms state-of-the-art results on lexical substi-tution tasks in an unsupervised setting. 1 Oren Melamud, Ido Dagan, Jacob Goldberger |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2014 | Probabilistic Modeling of Joint-context in Distributional SimilarityabstractMost traditional distributional similarity models fail to capture syntagmatic patterns that group together multiple word features within the same joint context.In this work we introduce a novel generic distributional similarity scheme under which the power of probabilistic models can be leveraged to effectively model joint contexts.Based on this scheme, we implement a concrete model which utilizes probabilistic n-gram language models.Our evaluations suggest that this model is particularly wellsuited for measuring similarity for verbs, which are known to exhibit richer syntagmatic patterns, while maintaining comparable or better performance with respect to competitive baselines for nouns.Following this, we propose our scheme as a framework for future semantic similarity models leveraging the substantial body of work that exists in probabilistic language modeling. Oren Melamud, Ido Dagan, Jacob Goldberger, Idan Szpektor, Deniz Yuret |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2013 | A Two Level Model for Context Sensitive Inference Rules
Oren Melamud, Jonathan Berant, Ido Dagan, Jacob Goldberger, Idan Szpektor |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2012 | Dotted interval graphsabstractWe introduce a generalization of interval graphs, which we call Dotted Interval Graphs (DIG). A dotted interval graph is an intersection graph of arithmetic progressions (dotted intervals). Coloring of dotted interval graphs naturally arises in the context of high throughput genotyping. We study the properties of dotted interval graphs, with a focus on coloring. We show that any graph is a DIG, but that DIG d graphs, that is, DIGs in which the arithmetic progressions have a jump of at most d , form a strict hierarchy. We show that coloring DIG d graphs is NP-complete even for d = 2. For any fixed d , we provide a 5/6 d + o ( d ) approximation for the coloring of DIG d graphs. Finally, we show that finding the maximal clique in DIG d graphs is fixed parameter tractable in d . Yonatan Aumann, Moshe Lewenstein, Oren Melamud, Ron Y. Pinter, Zohar Yakhini |
ACM Trans. Algorithms | 3 |
| 2005 | Dotted interval graphs and high throughput genotyping
Yonatan Aumann, Moshe Lewenstein, Oren Melamud, Ron Y. Pinter, Zohar Yakhini |
SODA | 3 |