Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark Feldman

dblp:15/2671 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 57% Network security · 33% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 10%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security
0.011999
Hardening COTS Software with Generic Software Wrappers · S&P 1999
Network security
email security
0.011995
MIME Object Security Services: Issues in a Multi-User Environment · USENIX Security Symposium 1995
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
multi-user security
0.011995
MIME Object Security Services: Issues in a Multi-User Environment · USENIX Security Symposium 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wrapper definition language · 0.0framework design · 0.0S/MIME · 0.0MIME · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Hardening COTS Software with Generic Software Wrappers
abstract
Numerous techniques exist to augment the security functionality of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) applications and operating systems, making them more suitable for use in mission-critical systems. Although individually useful, as a group these techniques present difficulties to system developers because they are not based on a common framework which might simplify integration and promote portability and reuse. The paper presents techniques for developing Generic Software Wrappers-protected, non-bypassable kernel-resident software extensions for augmenting security without modification of COTS source. We describe the key elements of our work: our high-level Wrapper Definition Language (WDL), and our framework for configuring, activating, and managing wrappers. We also discuss code reuse, automatic management of extensions, a framework for system-building through composition, platform-independence, and our experiences with our Solaris and FreeBSD prototypes.
Timothy Fraser, Lee Badger, Mark Feldman
S&P3
1995 MIME Object Security Services: Issues in a Multi-User Environment
James M. Galvin, Mark Feldman
USENIX Security Symposium2